Summary. The receptor tyrosine kinase Flt3 is expressed on leukaemic blasts of most cases with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In order to evaluate the presence and signi®cance of constitutive activation of Flt3 for leukaemogenesis, we (1) analysed the expression and activation status of the receptor in AML blasts; and (2) evaluated the functional consequences of constitutively active Flt3 in a myeloid progenitor cell line. Immunoprecipitation studies revealed Flt3 expression in a high proportion of AML cases (27/32) with liganddependent Flt3 autophosphorylation in 18, constitutive autophosphorylation in three and no autophosphorylation in six cases. Only one out of three samples with constitutively active Flt3 but 3/18 samples with liganddependent autophosphorylated Flt3 contained the recently described internal tandem repeat (ITR) mutations. To test the signi®cance of Flt3 activation in myeloid cell function, we also characterized the biochemical and biological effects of the activating mutation D838V of Flt3 (FLt3 D838V ) on the factor-dependent myeloid progenitor cell line 32Dcl3: cells transfected with wild-type Flt3 (32D/Flt3) grew FLt3 ligand (FL) dependent, and the receptor was ligand dependently autophosphorylated. In contrast, the receptor was constitutively autophosphorylated in 32D/Flt3 D838V cells, which grew independently of FL. We conclude that, in some AML samples, Flt3 is constitutively activated and that this does not correlate with ITR mutations in the juxtamembrane domain. Furthermore, constitutively active Flt3 confers factor independence to the myeloid progenitor cell line 32D. It remains to be determined whether activation of Flt3 is leukaemogenic in vivo and whether strategies aimed at inhibition of Flt3 activation could inhibit leukaemogenesis.

Purpose: AZD2014 is a novel, oral, m-TORC 1/2 inhibitor that has shown in vitro and in vivo efficacy across a range of preclinical human cancer models.Experimental Design: A rolling six-dose escalation was performed to define an MTD (part A), and at MTD a further cohort of patients was treated to further characterize toxicities and perform pre-and posttreatment biopsies (part B). AZD2014 was administered orally twice a day continuously. Flow cytometry, ELISA, and immunohistochemistry were used to quantify pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Pharmacokinetic analysis was carried out by mass spectrometry.Results: A total of 56 patients were treated across a dose range of 25 to 100 mg. The MTD was 50 mg twice daily. The dose-limiting toxicities were fatigue and mucositis. At the MTD, the most common adverse events (AE) were fatigue (78%), nausea (51%), and mucositis (49%), but these were equal to or greater than grade 3 in only 5% of patients. Drug levels achieved at the MTD (AUC ss 6686 ngÁh/mL, C max ss 1,664 ng/mL) were consistent with activity in preclinical models. A reduction in p-S6 levels and Ki67 staining was observed in 8 of 8 and 5 of 9 evaluable paired biopsy samples. Partial responses were seen in a patient with pancreatic cancer and a patient with breast cancer, who were found to have a PDGFR and ERBB2 mutation, respectively.Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose for further evaluation of AZD2014 is 50 mg twice daily, and at this dose it has been possible to demonstrate pharmacologically relevant plasma concentrations, target inhibition in tumor, and clinical responses.

Background:This study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the first-in-class dual mammalian target of rapamycin complex (mTORC)1/mTORC2 inhibitor, AZD8055.Methods:Patients with advanced solid malignancies or lymphomas were recruited into this phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study of AZD8055 starting at 10 mg twice-daily oral dosing (BID).Results:Forty-nine patients received AZD8055. Dose-limiting toxicities were reported at 40 mg (n=1), 90 mg (n=1) and 120 mg (n=3) BID; all were grade 3 rises in transaminases, reversible in all patients, apart from one who had liver metastases. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as 90 mg BID. The most frequent adverse events assessed to be related to AZD8055 were increased alanine aminotransferase (22%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (22%) and fatigue (16%). AZD8055 was rapidly absorbed (median tmax ∼0.5 h) and exposure increased with increasing doses. Seven patients had stable disease for ⩾4 months. Partial metabolic responses, assessed by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, were observed at ⩾40 mg BID (n=8 at day 35).Conclusion:The maximum tolerated dose for AZD8055 is 90 mg BID. Apart from elevated transaminases, which occurred at most dose levels, the drug had an acceptable toxicity profile; however, no RECIST responses were seen.

Tissue specimens from 26 cases of Hodgkin's disease (HD) and six HD-derived cell lines were analysed for tumour necrosis factor (TNF), lymphotoxin (LT), and interleukin (IL)-6 RNA transcripts by in situ hybridization, in some cases subsequent to immunohistology for CD30 antigen. LT and TNF transcripts were found in tumour cells of all cases; IL-6 gene transcripts were detectable in 19/23 cases. Presence of RNA specific for these cytokines was not correlated with any of the following parameters: sex, symptoms and histotype, as well as immunophenotype and association of the tumour cells with Epstein-Barr virus. Rather, the presence of LT, TNF and IL-6 transcripts appeared to characterize Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells in general, supporting concepts which suggest that HD represents a malignancy of cytokine secreting activated cells, and that many of the features distinguishing HD from other malignant lymphomas may ultimately be due to expression of cytokines. LT and TNF RNA transcripts were also found in five HD-derived cell lines, whereas supernatants of these cell lines contained high levels of LT, but low or undetectable levels of TNF activity. This suggests that, although not detectable at the level of RNA transcripts, differences between HD cases may exist on the level of cytokine gene transcript processing, translation and polypeptide secretion.

IMPORTANCE Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a substantial benefit of adding everolimus to endocrine therapy. Everolimus inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) complex but not mTORC2, which can set off an activating feedback loop via mTORC2. Vistusertib, a dual inhibitor of mTORC1 and mTORC2, has demonstrated broad activity in preclinical breast cancer models, showing superior activity to everolimus. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vistusertib in combination with fulvestrant compared with fulvestrant alone or fulvestrant plus everolimus in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The MANTA trial is an open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial in which 333 patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer progressing after prior aromatase inhibitor treatment underwent randomization (2:3:3:2) between April 1, 2014, and October 24, 2016, at 88 sites in 9 countries: 67 patients were assigned to receive fulvestrant, 103 fulvestrant plus vistusertib daily, 98 fulvestrant plus vistusertib intermittently, and 65 fulvestrant plus everolimus. Treatment was continued until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. INTERVENTIONS Fulvestrant alone or in combination with vistusertib (continuous or intermittent dosing schedules) or everolimus. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Among the 333 women in the study (median age, 63 years [range, 56-70 years]), median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.5-9.2 months) with fulvestrant, 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-9.4 months) with fulvestrant plus daily vistusertib, 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.6-9.9 months) with fulvestrant plus intermittent vistusertib, and 12.3 months (95% CI, 7.7-15.7 months) with fulvestrant plus everolimus. There was no significant difference in PFS between those receiving fulvestrant plus daily or intermittent vistusertib and fulvestrant alone (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.63-1.24]; P = .46; and hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.55-1.12]; P = .16). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The combination of fulvestrant plus everolimus demonstrated significantly longer PFS compared with fulvestrant plus vistusertib or fulvestrant alone. The trial failed to demonstrate a benefit of adding the dual mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibitor vistusertib to fulvestrant.