No abstract

No abstract

Despite the established success of surfactant application in neonates, the use of surfactant in older children is still a matter of discussion. We hypothesized that surfactant application in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to a pulmonary or systemic disease or after cardiac surgery improves pulmonary function. We also asked whether repeated treatment could further improve pulmonary function. To answer these questions, we measured oxygenation index (OI) and hypoxemia score after the first and after a second application of surfactant (50-100 mg/kg body wt) at least 24 h later. We enrolled 19 children (older than 4 weeks) for a retrospective chart review study, and six of them underwent cardiac surgery. Demographic data were extracted. OI and hypoxemia score were estimated before and 2 and 24 h after surfactant application. Lung injury score was calculated before and 24 h after surfactant application. Outcome measures included survival, duration of mechanical ventilation, and pediatric ICU and hospital stay. The median patient age was 9.0 (quarter percentile 3.7/25) months. The median weight was 8.4 (4.1/11.5) kg. The median lung injury score before the first surfactant application was 2.3 (2.3/2.6). Hospital duration and pediatric ICU stay for all patients was 31.0 (20.0/49.5) days and 27.0 (15.5/32.5) days, respectively. The duration of mechanical ventilation was 24.0 (18.5/31.0) days. The overall mortality was 53%. Twenty-four hours after the first surfactant application, pulmonary function significantly improved. The median OI was 14 (5.5/26) before and 7 (4.5/14.5) 24 h after surfactant application (P= 0.027). The hypoxemia score was 91.7 (69.9/154.2) before and 148.4 (99.2/167.6) 24 h after surfactant application (P = 0.0026). Seven children received a second application, which did not further improve pulmonary function. The lung injury score was not influenced by either surfactant application. We conclude that a single surfactant application improves pulmonary function in children with ARDS. A second application of surfactant showed no further benefit. Outcome was not affected in our study population.

Purpose:To describe the epidemiology of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in a Brazilian ICU.Methods: This prospective observational, non-interventional study, included all consecutive patients with ARDS criteria [1] admitted in the ICU of a Brazilian tertiary hospital, between January 1997 and September 2001. Were collected in a prospective fashion the following variables: age, gender, APACHE II score at ICU admission and at ARDS diagnosis, cause of ARDS, presence of AIDS, cancer and immunosuppression, occurrence of barotrauma, performance of traqueostomy, mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of stay (LOS) in ICU and in hospital. The lung injury score (LIS) [2] was used to quantify the degree of pulmonary injury in the first week of ARDS. Results:There was 2182 patients (P) admitted in ICU during the study period, of whom 141 (6.46%) had ARDS criteria. Seventy-six (54%) were men, the mean age was 46 ± 18 years, APACHE II 18 ± 7 and 19 ± 7 at admission and at ARDS diagnosis, respectively. Septic shock accounted for 42% (60 P) of the ARDS causes, sepsis 22% (31 P), diffuse pulmonary infection 16% (23 P), aspiration pneumonia 11% (15 P), non-septic shock 5% (7 P) and others 4% (5 P). Ten percent (14 P) had AIDS, 30% (43 P) cancer and 25% (36 P) immunosuppression. All patients were mechanically ventilated with Tidal Volume between 4 and 8 ml/kg. Only 3.5% (5 P) had barotrauma and 10% (14 P) performed traqueostomy. Mortality rate was 79% in the ICU. The patients required 12 ± 10 days on MV, ranging from 1 to 55 days. The LOS in ICU and hospital was 14 ± 13 (1-69) days and 28 ± 32 (1-325) days, respectively. There was a time delay of 3.7 ± 4.5 days between admission in ICU and the onset of ARDS. The Murray score (mean ± SD) was 3.2 ± 0.4, 3 ± 0.5, 3 ± 0.5, 2.9 ± 0.6, 2.8 ± 0.7, 2.7 ± 0.7 and 2.6 ± 0.8 in the first 7 days, respectively.Conclusions: ARDS in our hospital has a similar incidence of reports in the USA and Europe. There was a higher mortality, which could be explained by a high incidence of infection causes of ARDS, mainly septic shock, and elevated combined occurrence of AIDS, cancer and immunosuppression, along the degree of LIS. The incidence of barotrauma was low, as a consequence of the current mechanical ventilation strategies. References:1. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, et al.: Am Respir Crit Care Med 1994 P2Role of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in ARDS mortality FS Dias, N Almeida, IC Wawrzeniack, PB Nery Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga 6690, RS, Brazil Purpose: To correlate the occurrence and level of organ dysfunction in ARDS with mortality. Methods:This cohort study includes all consecutive patients with ARDS criteria [1] admitted in the ICU between January 1997 and September 2001. Were collected in a prospective fashion the following variables: age, gender, APACHE II score at the ARDS diagnosis, the occurrence of organ dysfunction determined by the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [2] in the first week, and mortality in ...