No abstract

No abstract

VirtualTouch is able to identify the presence of cirrhosis with good accuracy, shows good interobserver reproducibility and the correlation of its values with those obtained by transient elastography with Fibroscan is good.

Background: Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma can be achieved by imaging in cirrhotic patients. Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma is a primary liver tumor and its imaging patterns have been poorly investigated. Misdiagnosis for either hepatocellular carcinoma or benign lesions can occur. We aimed to evaluate the enhancement pattern of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis with imaging techniques and to estimate the risk of misdiagnosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: All histology-confirmed combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis seen in two Italian centers between 2003 and 2016, in which at least one imaging technique had been performed, was retrospectively collected. The enhancement pattern was analyzed for all available imaging modalities. Results: A total of 37 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma nodules were identified. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging had been performed in 27, 34, and 17 nodules, respectively. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was at higher risk of misdiagnosis for pure hepatocellular carcinoma than computed tomography (p ¼ 0.005) or magnetic resonance imaging (p ¼ 0.040). Only six of 24 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma lesions submitted to both contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography showed coincident patterns; contrast-enhanced ultrasound correctly suggested a condition of malignancy in a higher number of cases than computed tomography (p < 0.001) and magnetic resonance imaging (p ¼ 0.002). Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound misdiagnosed a higher number of combined hepatocellularcholangiocarcinoma as hepatocellular carcinoma than computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. However, the latter techniques were able to identify features of malignancy less often.

(Table is included in full-text article.)PBC in the advanced stage, corresponding to PBC stage IV, was shown in the past to be associated with an increased incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There is currently a debate, about the increase in incidence of extrahepatic malignancies, as some, but not all studies reported these neoplasms to be more common, especially breast cancer, irrespective of the PBC disease stage. In this issue of the journal a case series is reported on the incidence of various malignancies in a cohort of 212 patients with PBC from Greece. Considering as reference the cancer registries of another Mediterranean Country, like Italy, we could suggest that the incidence of extrahepatic malignancy, breast included, is not increased in PBC patients. Indeed, a more accurate analysis of the literature, shows that higher incidence of breast cancer were reported only for PBC patients evaluated in the 1970s and early 1980s, for whom a contribution of immunosuppressive agents, largely under investigation at that time, could be speculated. PBC patients do not need, therefore, to be submitted to stricter surveillance programs for extrahepatic cancer than the general population. As far as the development of HCC is concerned, instead, PBC patients should undergo the usual surveillance reserved to other categories of cirrhotic patients, according to published guidelines for the management of HCC. Such surveillance should start only when PBC patients have reached disease stage IV (frank cirrhosis).