No abstract

Background Multicenter randomized clinical trials on pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) support evidence-based care. However, many of these studies include homogenous study populations lacking diversity. Heterogeneous sampling allows for greater generalizability while increasing knowledge regarding specific subgroups. The racial/ethnic makeup of key pelvic floor disorder (PFD) trials has not been examined. Objective This study aimed to investigate racial/ethnic representation in major PFD clinical trials in comparison to racial/ethnic distribution of PFD in the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods Demographic data were extracted from completed PFD Network (PFDN) and Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network studies, which have resulted in nearly 200 publications. Prevalence of PFD by race/ethnicity was obtained from the NHANES. A representative index (Observed “n” by PFD study/Expected “n” based on the NHANES-reported prevalence) was calculated as a measure of representation. Meta-analyses were performed for each outcome and overall with respect to race/ethnicity. Results Eighteen PFDN/Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network studies were analyzed. White women comprised 70%–89% of PFD literature; Black women, 6%–16%; Hispanic women, 9%–15%; Asians, 0.5%–6%; and American Indians, 0%–2%. Representation of White women was higher in 13 of 18 PFDN studies compared with the NHANES prevalence data. Representation of Black women was either decreased or not reported in 10 of 18 index studies compared with the NHANES prevalence data. Hispanic women were absent or underrepresented in 7 of 18 PFDN studies compared with the prevalence data. Conclusions Our examination of PFDN and other landmark trials demonstrates inconsistent reporting of minority subgroups, limiting applicability with respect to minority populations. Our study suggests that PFD research would benefit from targeted sampling of minority groups.

Pregnant and postpartum women lack knowledge about UI and POP. Preconceptional counseling provides an opportunity for educational intervention.

Aims: Refractory overactive bladder (OAB) is among the most common reasons for referral to specialists in voiding dysfunction. Significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in prevalence, severity, and management of OAB, presenting care barriers for marginalized patients. We aim to explicate these disparities and explore the factors that led to their existence and persistence. We will additionally offer suggestions to mitigate such disparities and approach equitable care for our patients. Methods: This is a narrative review of pertinent articles related to health disparities in OAB. Articles on OAB prevalence stratified by race and ethnicity, and variations in treatment patterns for patients of marginalized backgrounds were identified from the PubMed database. We also included a review of evidence from governmental and historical sources to provide sociocultural context.Results: Patients from marginalized backgrounds are underrepresented in OAB literature. There appear to be differences in symptom severity and prevalence based on race. OAB severity seems closely entwined with social determinants of health. Patients from marginalized populations experience numerous care barriers impeding the treatment of OAB.Finally, White patients are more likely to receive advanced management for OAB.Conclusions: Numerous health disparities exist in the diagnosis and management of OAB. This review is grounded in societal context: health injustice in the United States ultimately stems from systemic racism.Improving our understanding of care disparities and the systems that allow them to persist will bring us closer to equity and allow our patients from marginalized backgrounds to obtain the evidence-based care they deserve.

Objective Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are severe tears involving the external and internal anal sphincters. We aimed to document the incidence of OASIs within a racially and ethnically diverse institution to elucidate which maternal, fetal, and parturition factors may be associated with OASIs in minority subgroups. Methods This was a retrospective unmatched case-control study of reproductive aged women who delivered between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017, at our institution. Data for maternal, fetal, and parturition factors were gathered through chart review. We also investigated the expertise level of the surgeon performing repairs and complications that developed in the postpartum period. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare women with third- and fourth-degree lacerations against the control group of women with first-degree, second-degree, or no lacerations. Results Of the 23,362 deliveries between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017, the incidence of OASIs was 1%. Of our patients, 38% self-identified as Hispanic, 32% as Black, 13% as White, and 3.5% as Asian. Risk for OASIs was significantly increased in nulliparity, Pitocin use, operative deliveries, episiotomy, and prolonged second stage of labor. Black race and obesity were protective for OASIs. There was no significant difference in complication rates based on type of repair nor the provider level of training. Conclusions The incidence of OASIs at our institution is similar to current published literature. Our study population is unique in its overrepresentation of minority groups, offering insight into potentially distinctive risk and protective factors associated with OASIs.