Functional outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage has traditionally been assessed using scales developed for other neurological conditions. The modified Rankin score and Glasgow Outcome Scale are most commonly used. Employment of these scales in subarachnoid haemorrhage is hampered by well recognized limitations. We set out to develop and validate a new condition-specific subarachnoid haemorrhage outcome tool (SAHOT). Items addressing diverse aspects of the impact of subarachnoid haemorrhage were collected during focus groups involving patients, next-of-kin and multidisciplinary professionals involved in subarachnoid haemorrhage management. After a series of iterative revisions, the resultant questionnaire was applied to patients and their next-of-kin at 1, 3 and 6 months post-subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rasch methodology was used to finalize the structure of the questionnaire and explore the extent to which SAHOT scores met Rasch-based criteria of successful measurement. The SAHOT was further assessed using traditional scale evaluation techniques, and validated in a second separate subarachnoid haemorrhage patient cohort. The final SAHOT included 56 items dealing with cognitive, physical, and behavioural/psychological consequences of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rasch analysis indicated the scale successfully measured functional outcome post-subarachnoid haemorrhage. Three item scoring categories produced the best scale performance. There was no evidence of differential item functioning between patients and next-of-kin. The SAHOT was found to be acceptable, have good convergent and divergent validity, good discrimination and excellent responsiveness. It was successfully validated in a second subarachnoid haemorrhage patient cohort. The SAHOT offers the first subarachnoid haemorrhage-specific scientifically robust outcome measure with potential utility in neurovascular clinical services and research studies.

Glioblastoma is the most common form of primary malignant brain tumour. These tumours are highly proliferative and infiltrative resulting in a median patient survival of only 14 months from diagnosis. The current treatment regimens are ineffective against the small population of cancer stem cells residing in the tumourigenic niche; however, a new therapeutic approach could involve the removal of these cells from the microenvironment that maintains the cancer stem cell phenotype. We have isolated multipotent sphere-forming cells from human high grade glioma (glioma sphere-forming cells (GSCs)) to investigate the adhesive and migratory properties of these cells in vitro. We have focused on the role of two closely related metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17 due to their high expression in glioblastoma and GSCs and their ability to activate cytokines and growth factors. Here, we report that ADAM10 and ADAM17 inhibition selectively increases GSC, but not neural stem cell, migration and that the migrated GSCs exhibit a differentiated phenotype. We also observed a correlation between nestin, a stem/progenitor marker, and fibronectin, an extracellular matrix protein, expression in high grade glioma tissues. GSCs adherence on fibronectin is mediated by α5β1 integrin, where fibronectin further promotes GSC migration and is an effective candidate for in vivo cancer stem cell migration out of the tumourigenic niche. Our results suggest that therapies against ADAM10 and ADAM17 may promote cancer stem cell migration away from the tumourigenic niche resulting in a differentiated phenotype that is more susceptible to treatment.

No abstract

PurposeUse of 18-FDG PET–CT is increasing in patients with head and neck cancer, enabling the identification of metastases or synchronous malignancies, but also ‘incidental’ disease. We aimed to establish the rate of ‘incidental’ findings resulting from 18-FDG PET-specific imaging, that would not have been otherwise identified on other imaging, in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing staging or surveillance of disease.Methods18-FDG PET–CT was performed for investigation or surveillance. Case notes were reviewed retrospectively. Unexpected findings identifiable on CT imaging alone, or by FDG-PET were recorded. For those only identifiable with FDG-PET, findings were divided into either ‘incidental’ or ‘intentional’, and benign or malignant.Results93 patients underwent 18- FDG PET–CT. 86.0% had new pathology identified. 3.2% had a new malignancy identified. 37.6% had new findings on FDG-PET that would not have been identified on CT alone: 5.4% had ‘intentional findings’ (metastasis), and 32.3% had ‘incidental findings’ (synchronous malignancy or benign). 1.1% had a new malignancy on FDG-PET alone.ConclusionsIntentional and incidental findings are likely on 18-FDG PET–CT. Whilst important for patient management, there is an associated emotional and financial cost, which needs acknowledgement and further investigation.