Objectives Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading cause of hospitalization for a gastrointestinal illness in the United States. We hypothesized that enhanced recovery approaches may lead to earlier time to refeeding in patients with AP. Methods We performed a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of patients admitted with mild AP from July 2016 to April 2017 at a tertiary medical center. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either enhanced recovery consisting of nonopioid analgesia, patient-directed oral intake, and early ambulation versus standard treatment with opioid analgesia and physician-directed diet. Primary study end point was time to oral refeeding on an intent-to-treat basis. Secondary end points included differences in pancreatitis activity scores, morphine equivalents, length of stay, and 30-day readmissions. Results Forty-six participants enrolled. Median age was 53.1 years, and 54.3% were female. There was significant reduction in time to successful oral refeeding in the enhanced recovery versus standard treatment group (median, 13.8 vs 124.8 hours, P < 0.001). Pancreatitis activity scores trended lower at 48 to 96 hours among patients assigned to enhanced recovery (mean, 43.6 vs. 58.9, P = 0.32). No differences found in length of stay or 30-day readmissions. Conclusion In this randomized controlled trial, enhanced recovery was safe and effective in promoting earlier time to refeeding in patients hospitalized with AP.

No abstract

Background and aims Current endoscopic methods of biliary decompression in malignant pancreatic neoplasms are often limited by anatomical and technical challenges. In this case series, we report our experience with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided placement of an electrocautery-enhanced, lumen-apposing self-expandable metallic stent (LAMS) via transmural gallbladder drainage. Methods This is a retrospective case series of nine patients (five male, mean age 63.1 years) who underwent EUS-guided LAMS placement for malignant, obstructive jaundice in the pancreatic head. All nine cases were performed by an experienced interventional endoscopist at a single, tertiary medical center. We review the technical and clinical success rates as well as the incidence of procedural adverse events across the nine patients. Results LAMS placement was technically successful in all cases and there were no procedural adverse events. Seven of nine (77.78 %) patients showed clinical and laboratory improvement immediately following the procedure. One case required re-intervention with interventional radiology guided biliary drain placement. The mean fluoroscopy time was 1.02 minutes. Conclusions EUS-guided LAMS placement for transmural gallbladder drainage in malignant obstruction appears to be a safe and effective technique, allowing patients to proceed to surgery, chemotherapy, or hospice care.