Young children are often dependent upon learning from others and to this effect develop heuristics to help distinguish reliable from unreliable sources. Where younger children rely heavily on social cues such as familiarity with a source to make this distinction, older ones tend to rely more on an informant’s competence (Tong et al., 2020). Little is known about the cognitive mechanisms that help children select the best informant, however some evidence points towards mechanisms such as metacognition (thinking about thinking) and theory of mind (thinking about other’s thoughts) being involved. The goals of the present study were to 1) explore how the monitoring and control components of metacognition may predict selective social learning in preschoolers and 2) to attempt to replicate a reported link between selective social learning and theory of mind. In Experiment 1, no relationship was observed across the measures. In Experiment 2, only selective social learning and belief reasoning were found to be related, as well as when both experiment’s samples were combined. No links between selective social learning and metacognition were observed in the two experiments. These results suggest that theory of mind is a stronger correlate of selective learning than metacognition in young children.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.