The case of an energy production community in Colorado is used to illustrate a) the great need for reliable subnational population forecasts, especially in communities expecting rapid population growth, and b) why such projections, as currently performed, cannot be reliable. Explanations for failure in forecasting are found in the methods themselves, the unavailability and unreliability of key data, politics, and the intrusion of the designers' and users' values into the forecasting models. As one solution it is proposed that forecasting be reconceptualized from a technical to an ethical issue and that it be based upon an active rather than a passive planning/forecasting philosophy. As such, the community and industry would set a desired, realistic goal, and forecasting models would be run backwards to determine the economic-demographic paths by which this goal could be achieved.
A certainty for the future of the United States is the increased development of domestic energy sources and, consequently, an increase in the number of energy boom towns. Although the negative social consequences for these small, rapidly growing communities have been amply documented, little is known about how energy development specifically affects women. Data from an exploratory study of women in an energy boom town and a preboom town suggest that women do not benefit equally with men and are even disadvantaged by energy development. Categories of families and employed women are discussed, and the findings are related to the broader topic of women and development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.