The creation of acceptable standard definitions for terms used in the care and assessment of haemophilia patients has become increasingly important, as a growing number of international clinical studies have been initiated. The Delphi approach has been used in health research to reach consensus in large groups and can be used to develop definitions by using several iterations of surveys eliciting opinions from specialists in the field. Three consecutive surveys were designed based on the Delphi approach and distributed to specialist physicians, nurses and physiotherapists in order to develop definitions for seven haemophilia terms: 'primary prophylaxis', 'secondary prophylaxis', 'target joint', 'joint bleed', 'significant soft-tissue bleed', 'superficial soft-tissue bleed' and 'mucosal bleed'. Suggestions were solicited, compiled into a subsequent survey and fed back to the group to rank-order the importance of each suggested component of the definition. Final definitions were created using the top-ranked suggestions and sent back to the experts for approval. Five of the seven terms were highly endorsed with greater than 90% agreement. Some differences in agreement were found when analysed by profession. Haemophilia terms were successfully defined using the Delphi approach. Further refinement from members of the international haemophilia community will ensure that comprehensive standard definitions can be used in multicentre studies in the future.

Background Standard of care for persons with severe hemophilia A includes regular replacement of factor VIII (FVIII). Prophylaxis regimens using standard half‐life (SHL) FVIII concentrates, while effective, are costly and require frequent intravenous infusions. Aim This study evaluated the adherence of 56 boys with severe hemophilia A to tailored, frequency‐escalated prophylaxis with an SHL recombinant FVIII concentrate. Methods We reviewed the factor infusion and bleeding logs of study subjects. Adherence to the prescribed regimen was calculated on a weekly basis, and bleeding rates were determined from self/proxy‐reported bleeding logs. The primary outcome was adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen. Results The median (range of values [ROV]) weekly adherence to prophylaxis was 85.7% (37.4%‐99.8%). The median (ROV) adherent weeks on steps 1 (weekly), 2 (twice weekly), and 3 (alternate‐day) were 92.9% (50%‐100%), 80.3 (32%‐96%), and 72.6% (14%‐98%); relative to step 1, subjects were less likely to be adherent on steps 2 and 3 (P < 0.00). On step 1, our cohort had higher adherence than previously reported rates. The median (ROV) adherence to the breakthrough bleeding protocol was 47.1% (0%‐100%). At any given time, bleeding risk was reduced by 15% for each 10% increase in adherence during the preceding 12 weeks (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.81‐0.90). Conclusion This cohort had high rates of adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen. Initiating prophylaxis with once‐weekly infusions facilitated adherence to the prophylaxis regimen in this cohort of boys with severe hemophilia A started on primary prophylaxis at a very young age.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the inhibitor development (ID) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A (FVIII ≤ 0.01 IU mL(-1) ). All Canadian Haemophilia Treatment Centres completed a questionnaire on patients born between September 2005 and August 2010 and followed for up to 7 years. Eligible patients had at least 20 exposure days (ED) or had developed an inhibitor. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for risk factors to develop an inhibitor were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. A total of 99 haemophilia A PUPs were studied. Thirty-four (34%) developed an inhibitor (24/34 of high titre). Inhibitors developed in 25/63 (40%) patients with a high-risk mutation. ID was most frequent in Aboriginals (86%). Dose intensity (IU kg(-1)  day(-1) X number of ED) at first exposure to factor VIII (FVIII) was associated with a crude OR increase of 1.10 (95% CI: 0.99-1.23) with each increase of 100 dose-intensity units. Haemarthrosis and intracranial bleeding as the indication for first exposure to FVIII concentrate were associated with a crude OR for ID of 7.63 (95% CI: 2.14-27.17) and 5.08 (95% CI: 1.11-23.31) respectively. ID according to FVIII concentrate used was: Advate (®) 18/50 (36%), Kogenate FS(®) or Helixate FS(®) 15/36 (42%), Wilate(®) 0/11 and Xyntha(®) 1/2. In multivariate analysis, Aboriginal ethnicity (OR = 11.69; 95% CI: 1.11-122.86) and haemarthrosis (OR = 4.49; 95% CI: 1.08-18.61) were statistically significant. The cumulative incidence of ID in severe haemophilia A PUPs was 34% and varied according to ethnicity, type of bleeding at first ED, type of FVIII product and dose intensity at first exposure.

No abstract

Objective The primary objective of this study was to assess whether there are different patterns (classes) of joint health in young boys with severe haemophilia A (SHA) prescribed primary tailored prophylaxis. We also assessed whether age at first index joint bleed, blood group, FVIII gene abnormality variant, factor VIII trough level, first‐year bleeding rate and adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen significantly predicted joint damage trajectory, and thus class membership. Methods Using data collected prospectively as part of the Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study (CHPS), we implemented a latent class growth mixture model technique to determine how many joint damage classes existed within the cohort. We used a multinomial logistic regression to predict the odds of class membership based on the above predictors. We fitted a survival model to assess whether there were differences in the rate of dose escalation across the groups. Results We identified three distinct classes of trajectory: persistently low, moderately increasing and rapidly increasing joint scores. By multinomial regression, we found that only age at first index joint bleed predicted rapidly increasing joint scores. The rapidly increasing joint score class group moved through dose escalation significantly faster than the other two groups. Conclusions Using tailored prophylaxis, boys with SHA follow one of three joint health trajectories. By using knowledge of disease trajectories, clinicians may be able to adjust treatment according to a subject's predicted long‐term joint health and institute cost‐effective programmes of prophylaxis targeted at the individual subject level.