Effective antimicrobial stewardship practices are increasingly essential to best utilize the current arsenal of antimicrobials for the shortest necessary duration to minimize the development of antimicrobial resistance, secondary infections, and health care costs. Monitoring of serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels represents an effective antimicrobial stewardship strategy to differentiate bacterial infections from viral infections and noninfectious inflammatory conditions. Current literature illustrates the merits of PCT monitoring in reducing duration of antibiotic therapy without detrimental effects on mortality or infection relapses. However, the interpretation of PCT levels can be challenging, especially in light of comorbid disease states that can elevate PCT levels. This review sheds light on the utility of PCT monitoring, as well as providing insight into the practical interpretation of PCT levels. Much of the current literature surrounding PCT monitoring consists of use among patients with lower respiratory tract infections or in the critically ill. Overall, studies have demonstrated shorter antibiotic therapy durations when PCT monitoring is utilized. No studies to date have found increased rates of mortality or infection relapses, suggesting that PCT monitoring is not only effective, but also safe when used as a guide for antimicrobial therapy. Nonetheless, many conditions were shown to elevate PCT serum concentrations, even in the absence of bacterial infections, which can make interpretation of PCT concentrations challenging. Two common conditions that affect the accurate interpretation of PCT levels are renal dysfunction and congestive heart failure. Limited studies have been performed in these populations, but current available data propose the need for higher PCT thresholds in those with renal dysfunction or congestive heart failure and support utilizing PCT trends to monitor clinical improvement from bacterial infections. Evidence also suggests that PCT monitoring is cost-effective, as long as the test is ordered judiciously. In summary, PCT monitoring represents a promising antimicrobial stewardship strategy to limit exposure to unnecessary antimicrobial therapy.

Patients with reported penicillin allergies have been proven to experience negative health consequences, such as increased cost, suboptimal antimicrobial therapy, and adverse reactions. Though skin testing has been proposed as a method to clarify penicillin allergies, many institutions may lack the resources to perform skin testing on a wide scale. This literature review describes the current literature surrounding the use of penicillin allergy interviews when skin testing is not an option. Specifically, the review highlights the steps in carrying out a successful antibiotic allergy patient interview, summarizes the clinical evidence surrounding antibiotic allergy clarifications, and addresses key advantages and disadvantages of clarifying antibiotic allergies without the availability of skin testing.

Background: Patients with reported β-lactam allergies often receive broad-spectrum antimicrobials and have been shown to experience a variety of negative health consequences, such as increased mortality, costs, readmission, and adverse reactions. Current literature focuses on β-lactam allergy skin testing but lacks evidence on β-lactam allergy interviews (BLAI) when skin testing is unavailable. Objective: This study aimed to test the impact of a pharmacy-led BLAI on duration of fluoroquinolones at a community hospital. Methods: A quasi-experimental design with a prospective cohort design and historical control group was used to assess patients with reported penicillin (PCN) allergies in a community hospital. The primary outcome was duration of fluoroquinolones before and after implementation of BLAI. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), percentage of patients switched to a β-lactam antibiotic, percentage of antimicrobial stewardship recommendations made/accepted, and discrepancies between allergy in medical record and interview-reported allergy. Nonparametric continuous data and medians were evaluated by Mann-Whitney U. Results: A total of 80 patients were included in the study (43 in the control group and 37 in the prospective group). Fluoroquinolone duration was reduced after the implementation of BLAI (3.7 vs 2.7 days, P = 0.027). In all, 49% of patients in the prospective group were switched to a β-lactam antibiotic after BLAI, with no allergic reactions, adverse effects, or impact on LOS. Conclusion and Relevance: BLAI resulted in a significant reduction in fluoroquinolone duration in patients with PCN allergies and may represent a safe and effective option for institutions lacking skin-testing capabilities.

Introduction Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, most pharmacy residency programs changed to an all‐virtual format for recruitment and interviews for the 2020‐2021 application cycle. There are no data evaluating the experiences and perceptions of these changes from the perspective of pharmacy residency programs and applicants. Methods An electronic cross‐sectional survey was distributed via email to post‐graduate year 1 (PGY1) and post‐graduate year 2 (PGY2) pharmacy residency programs and applicants across the Southeastern United States. Results have been reported according to the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) guidelines (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research [EQUATOR] Network). Results 142 residency applicants and 104 residency programs responded to the survey. Most respondents participated in virtual recruitment and interviews. In 2020‐2021, less residency programs participated in local/regional showcases and personal placement services, but social media engagement increased. Of the applicants who responded, over half felt the need to apply to more programs during this application cycle, and a corresponding increase in applications were seen by residency programs. Residency interviews appeared shorter than previous years, and less programs offered an informal time to get to know the applicants. Overall, applicants and residency programs preferred on‐site interviews, but both parties reported feeling confident creating rank lists after virtual interviews. Conclusion These results highlight the impact of COVID‐19 on residency recruitment and the interview process. Residency programs should implement feedback for improving the virtual experience, as able. The ongoing pandemic may affect the 2022‐2023 application cycle, and pharmacy leadership organizations should consider developing guidance for applicants and residency programs on navigating another year of virtual events. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Background: Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) is a common antibiotic combination used in hospitals, and there has been increasing data indicating that the combination is associated with increased rates of acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unclear if the dosing method of vancomycin would mitigate the risk of AKI seen with VPT. Objective: To observe and compare incidence of AKI in patients on VPT when using the trough-based dosing method versus the area-under-the-curve (AUC)-based dosing method. Methods: This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational study at 3 community hospitals. Adults receiving at least 48 hours of VPT were included. Patients with severe renal dysfunction, pregnant patients, prisoners, and patients with central nervous system infections, or malignancy were excluded. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI as defined by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) criteria. Results: A total of 300 patients were included in the study; 150 patients in both the trough and AUC groups. A total of 23 patients (15%) in the trough group and 17 patients (11%) in the AUC group met the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR]: 0.7058, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.3603, 1.3826], P = .3098). Conclusion and Relevance: The incidence of AKI was lower in the AUC group compared with the trough group; however, this was not significant. The results of our study suggest that there is no difference between incidence of AKI when using trough- or AUC-based dosing in those receiving VPT. Because of the small sample size and retrospective nature of the study, more data are needed.