A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted to evaluate the total environmental impact of state-of-theart Waste-to-Energy (WtE) in Belgium, with respect to recovered energy utilization and addition of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). Four energy output scenarios were modelled on Umberto LCA software using primary data of mass and energy ows surrounding the six incinerators at the considered WtE plant, and prede ned processes from the Ecoinvent 3.6 database. The normalized LCA results suggest that by utilizing all the recovered energy as steam, the WtE plant can avoid an equivalent annual environmental impact value of approximately 21200, 36800, 6700, 15800, 37000 and 6900 average European citizens in the impact categories 'climate change', 'freshwater and terrestrial acidi cation', 'freshwater eutrophication, 'photochemical ozone creation' and 'respiratory effects, inorganics', 'terrestrial eutrophication', respectively. The 'Electricity and Steam with CCS' scenario resulted in the most avoided environmental impact in the impact category 'climate change'. However, in all other impact categories, it resulted in less avoided environmental impact compared to the 'Steam' scenario. The comparative analysis showed that 19 out of 24 of the LCA results varied by more than 50% between two energy substitution models, thus quantifying the in uence of energy substitution in LCA modelling. This study exempli es the environmental bene t WtE technology can realize by substituting conventional energy production processes that are reliant on fossil resources, whilst performing its primary function that is reducing the volume of non-recyclable waste, destroying hazardous organic components it contains and recovering useful materials from it.

A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted to evaluate the total environmental impact of state-of-the-art Waste-to-Energy (WtE) in Belgium, with respect to recovered energy utilization and addition of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). Four energy output scenarios were modelled on Umberto LCA software using primary data of mass and energy flows surrounding the six incinerators at the considered WtE plant, and predefined processes from the Ecoinvent 3.6 database. The normalized LCA results suggest that by utilizing all the recovered energy as steam, the WtE plant can avoid an equivalent annual environmental impact value of approximately 21200, 36800, 6700, 15800, 37000 and 6900 average European citizens in the impact categories ‘climate change’, ‘freshwater and terrestrial acidification’, ‘freshwater eutrophication, ‘photochemical ozone creation’ and ‘respiratory effects, inorganics’, ‘terrestrial eutrophication’, respectively. The ‘Electricity and Steam with CCS’ scenario resulted in the most avoided environmental impact in the impact category ‘climate change’. However, in all other impact categories, it resulted in less avoided environmental impact compared to the ‘Steam’ scenario. The comparative analysis showed that 19 out of 24 of the LCA results varied by more than 50% between two energy substitution models, thus quantifying the influence of energy substitution in LCA modelling. This study exemplifies the environmental benefit WtE technology can realize by substituting conventional energy production processes that are reliant on fossil resources, whilst performing its primary function that is reducing the volume of non-recyclable waste, destroying hazardous organic components it contains and recovering useful materials from it.