SummaryA postal questionnaire survey was sent to Royal College of Anaesthetists' tutors in Great Britain and Northern Ireland to gain insight into current practice with regard to information and consent for anaesthesia. Details of consent practice in three specific areas were requested: anaesthesia in general, teaching medical students during anaesthesia and obstetric anaesthesia. Replies were received from 218 tutors (77%). Of these, 72% of departments had a policy on consent for anaesthesia that was in accordance with The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines oǹ Information and Consent for Anaesthesia'. We identified three areas of concern. Firstly, almost a third of departments (27%) had no policy on consent for anaesthesia. Second, only 18% of relevant departments obtain specific consent for the teaching of medical students on anaesthetised patients. Third, 1 year after publication of the guidelines, 17% of obstetric anaesthetic units, despite stating an intention to alter their departmental policy based on the Association's recommendations, had not yet implemented any changes.

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented for young people within the UK. The pandemic has presented particular challenges for vulnerable children and young people. For example, a recent study in the UK indicated that 83% of young people with existing mental health conditions said the pandemic had made their condition worse (Young Minds, 2020). To date, the impact upon populations such as young people in Secure Children’s Homes (SCHs) is unknown. This study aims to elucidate this area. Design/methodology/approach SCHs provide a safe, supportive environment for vulnerable young people who frequently present with multiple and complex needs. Young people residing within a SCH may be residing at the setting because of a Secure Accommodation Order under a Section 25 Order of the Children’s Act (1989) or for criminal justice reasons, i.e. serving a Remand period or custodial sentence. Preliminary research compared a baseline period to a follow-up period after the commencement of COVID-19 national lockdown measures within a SCH in the North of England to develop understanding of the impact for young people. Findings A significant decrease in overall incidents (t (5) = −6.88, p < 0.001), restraints (t (5) = −9.07, p < 0.001) and other incidents including assaults occurred during follow-up. The SECURE STAIRS framework supports trauma-informed care and enhances support within the setting. Consistent with the framework, provision of formulation meetings was significantly increased within the follow-up period (Welsh’s t (74) = −2.74, p < 0.001). Reflections and future recommendations are outlined. Originality/value The unanticipated results highlight the value of examining incident data within secure environments and could lead to effective practice changes for practitioners working within this domain. This research also demonstrates how frameworks such as SECURE STAIRS can be beneficial for vulnerable young people during periods of change and stress in mitigating some of the potential negative effects. The implementation of such frameworks within SCHs is still novel and thus evaluative research is valuable.