ObjectiveTo investigate how women experience the initial period of a new pregnancy after suffering recurrent miscarriage (RM).DesignA qualitative study, nested within a randomised controlled feasibility study of a coping intervention for RM, used semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic network approach.SettingParticipants were recruited from the Recurrent Miscarriage Clinic and Early Pregnancy Unit in two tertiary referral hospitals in the UK.Participants14 women with RMs and who had previously participated in the randomised controlled trial (RCT) feasibility component of the study were recruited.ResultsSeven organising themes emerged from the data: (1) turmoil of emotions, (2) preparing for the worst, (3) setting of personal milestones, (4) hypervigilance, (5) social isolation, (6) adoption of pragmatic approaches, (7) need for professional affirmation.ConclusionsThe study established that for women with a history of RM, the waiting period of a new pregnancy is a traumatic time of great uncertainty and emotional turmoil and one in which they express a need for emotional support. Consideration should be given to the manner in which supportive care is best delivered within the constraints of current health service provision.Trial registration numberISRCTN43571276
BackgroundWomen have consistently reported lower satisfaction with postnatal care compared with antenatal and labour care. The aim of this research was to examine whether women’s experience of inpatient postnatal care in England is associated with variation in midwifery staffing levels.MethodsAnalysis of data from the National Maternity Survey in 2018 including 17,611 women from 129 organisations. This was linked to hospital midwifery staffing numbers from the National Health Service (NHS) Workforce Statistics and the number of births from Hospital Episode Statistics. A two-level logistic regression model was created to examine the association of midwifery staffing levels and experiences in post-natal care.ResultsThe median full time equivalent midwives per 100 births was 3.55 (interquartile range 3.26 to 3.78). Higher staffing levels were associated with less likelihood of women reporting delay in discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.849, 95% CI 0.753 to 0.959, p=0.008), increased chances of women reporting that staff always helped in a reasonable time aOR1.200 (95% CI 1.052, 1.369, p=0.007) and that they always had the information or explanations they needed aOR 1.150 (95% CI 1.040, 1.271, p=0.006). Women were more likely to report being treated with kindness and understanding with higher staffing, but the difference was small and not statistically significant aOR 1.059 (0.949, 1.181, p=0.306).ConclusionsNegative experiences for women on postnatal wards were more likely to occur in trusts with fewer midwives. Low staffing could be contributing to discharge delays and lack of support and information, which may in turn have implications for longer term outcomes for maternal and infant wellbeing.ExplanationWhile we recognise that not all gestational parents identify as women; this term was chosen as it has been used in the data source which was accessed for this study and represents most people having maternities.Statement of significance (problem)Women report negative experiences of postnatal care compared with antenatal care and birth. There is a recognised shortage of midwives in maternity services, and this may be impacting on the quality of postnatal care.What is already known?There is evidence that midwifery staffing levels are associated with birth outcomes but little empirical evidence on the impact of midwifery staffing levels in postnatal careWhat this paper adds?This analysis of survey data supports previous findings that increased midwifery staffing is associated with benefits. This is the first study to examine the effects of staffing on women’s experience of postnatal care.
Decision making is one of the most important skills that midwifery students should acquire through their education. Various methods of teaching the theoretical perspective can be easily adopted in the classroom. However, the speed that decisions sometimes have to be made in the clinical situation may not always allow time for the student to practise these skills for real or give the opportunity to realize the consequence of them. This article identifies how a filmed scenario-based activity can provide a ‘real time’ skills rehearsal for third year student midwives within the confines of a safe environment. Interactive decision making increases the development of procedural knowledge within the student and may also reduce the period of time required to acquire skills of effective clinical decision making. It is anticipated that this format for providing education can be used effectively for bridging the transition period from student to newly qualified midwife.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.