The molecular mechanisms by which mammalian receptor tyrosine kinases are negatively regulated remain largely unexplored. Previous genetic and biochemical studies indicate that Kekkon-1, a transmembrane protein containing leucine-rich repeats and an immunoglobulin-like domain in its extracellular region, acts as a feedback negative regulator of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor signaling in Drosophila melanogaster development. Here we tested whether the related human LRIG1 (also called Lig-1) protein can act as a negative regulator of EGF receptor and its relatives, ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4. We observed that in co-transfected 293T cells, LRIG1 forms a complex with each of the ErbB receptors independent of growth factor binding. We further observed that co-expression of LRIG1 with EGF receptor suppresses cellular receptor levels, shortens receptor half-life, and enhances ligand-stimulated receptor ubiquitination. Finally, we observed that co-expression of LRIG1 suppresses EGF-stimulated transformation of NIH3T3 fibroblasts and that the inducible expression of LRIG1 in PC3 prostate tumor cells suppresses EGF-and neuregulin-1-stimulated cell cycle progression. Our observations indicate that LRIG1 is a negative regulator of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases and suggest that LRIG1-mediated receptor ubiquitination and degradation may contribute to the suppression of ErbB receptor function.The four members of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases (epidermal growth factor (EGF) 1 receptor, ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4) play key roles in mediating the development of a variety of tissues, and the aberrant activation of these receptors contributes to the growth and progression of numerous tumor types (1, 2). Binding of EGF-like family ligands to ErbB receptors stimulates receptor dimerization, kinase activation, autophosphorylation, and the engagement of multiple intracellular growth signaling pathways. Although considerable effort over the past two decades has gone into understanding mechanisms by which ErbB receptors are activated and signals are propagated, our understanding of the variety of molecular mechanisms underlying the suppression of growth factor receptor activity remains in its infancy.Growth factor-stimulated receptor down-regulation, involving receptor internalization and the cbl-mediated ubiquitination and trafficking of receptors to lysosomes (3, 4), represents one mechanism for preventing hypersignaling by the ErbB receptors. However, whereas EGF receptor (ErbB1 or EGFR) efficiently couples to cbl following stimulation with its ligand EGF, the ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4 receptors do not efficiently couple to cbl following stimulation with neuregulin-1 (NRG1) (5) and do not undergo efficient NRG1-stimulated down-regulation (6, 7). Hence, other negative regulatory mechanisms may play major roles in suppressing ErbB receptor activity.Studies from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster point to the existence of several classes of proteins that negatively regulate EGF receptor activity in flies (...

The ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase is overexpressed in f25% of breast tumors and contributes to poor patient prognosis and therapeutic resistance. Here, we examine the role of the recently discovered ErbB negative regulator LRIG1 in ErbB2 + breast cancer. We observe that LRIG1 protein levels are significantly suppressed in ErbB2-induced mammary tumors in transgenic mice as well as in the majority of ErbB2 + human breast tumors. These observations raise the possibility that LRIG1 loss could contribute to the initiation or growth of ErbB2 + breast tumors. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of endogenous LRIG1 in the ErbB2-overexpressing breast tumor cell lines MDA-MB-453 and BT474 further elevates ErbB2 in these cells and augments cellular proliferation. In contrast, ectopic expression of LRIG1 reverses these trends. Interestingly, we observe that LRIG1 protein levels are suppressed in response to ErbB receptor activation in breast tumor cells but are unaffected by ErbB activation in immortalized nontransformed breast epithelial cells. Our observations indicate that the suppression of LRIG1 protein levels is a common feature of breast tumors. Moreover, our observations point to the existence of a feed-forward regulatory loop in breast tumor cells where aberrant ErbB2 signaling suppresses LRIG1 protein levels, which in turn contributes to ErbB2 overexpression. [Cancer Res 2008;68(20):8286-94]

IntroductionPrevious studies indicate that overexpression of the membrane-associated mucin MUC4 is potently anti-adhesive to cultured tumor cells, and suppresses cellular apoptotic response to a variety of insults. Such observations raise the possibility that MUC4 expression could contribute to tumor progression or metastasis, but the potential involvement of MUC4 in breast cancer has not been rigorously assessed. The present study aimed to investigate the expression of the membrane mucin MUC4 in normal breast tissue, primary breast tumors and lymph node metastases, and to evaluate the role of MUC4 in promoting the malignant properties of breast tumor cells.MethodsMUC4 expression levels in patient-matched normal and tumor breast tissue was initially examined by immunoblotting lysates of fresh frozen tissue samples with a highly specific preparation of anti-MUC4 monoclonal antibody 1G8. Immunohistochemical analysis was then carried out using tissue microarrays encompassing patient-matched normal breast tissue and primary tumors, and patient-matched lymph node metastases and primary tumors. Finally, shRNA-mediated knockdown was employed to assess the contribution of MUC4 to the cellular growth and malignancy properties of JIMT-1 breast cancer cells.ResultsImmunoblotting and immunohistochemistry revealed that MUC4 levels are suppressed in the majority (58%, p < 0.001) of primary tumors relative to patient-matched normal tissue. On the other hand, lymph node metastatic lesions from 37% (p < 0.05) of patients expressed higher MUC4 protein levels than patient-matched primary tumors. MUC4-positive tumor emboli were often found in lymphovascular spaces of lymph node metastatic lesions. shRNA-mediated MUC4 knockdown compromised the migration, proliferation and anoikis resistance of JIMT-1 cells, strongly suggesting that MUC4 expression actively contributes to cellular properties associated with breast tumor metastasis.ConclusionsOur observations suggest that after an initial loss of MUC4 levels during the transition of normal breast tissue to primary tumor, the re-establishment of elevated MUC4 levels confers an advantage to metastasizing breast tumor cells by promoting the acquisition of cellular properties associated with malignancy.

The ErbB2 and ErbB3 receptor tyrosine kinases act synergistically to promote cellular properties associated with tumor development. Previous studies indicate that endogenous ErbB3 protein is markedly elevated in mouse mammary tumors induced by transgenic ErbB2 overexpression. However, this occurs in the absence of elevated ErbB3 transcript, indicating that post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms play crucial roles in suppressing ErbB3 protein in normal tissue. Our previous studies also demonstrate that protein levels of Nrdp1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets ErbB3 for degradation, are markedly suppressed in tumors from ErbB2 transgenic animals relative to normal tissue. Here we demonstrate that transgenic expression of Nrdp1 cDNA in the mouse mammary gland is not sufficient to suppress elevated ErbB3 levels or tumor initiation and growth in ErbB2 transgenic mice. Unexpectedly, Nrdp1 protein is absent in tumors from Nrdp1/ErbB2 bigenic mice, and real time PCR analysis indicates that Nrdp1 protein levels are suppressed post-transcriptionally. Nrdp1 protein is more resistant to proteasome-dependent degradation when exogenously expressed in cultured MCF10A nontransformed human breast epithelial cells than in breast tumor cells. These observations indicate that mammary tumors use potent post-transcriptional mechanisms to suppress Nrdp1 protein levels and that protein destabilization may play a central role in Nrdp1 loss in tumors.Overexpression and aberrant activation of members of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases are thought to contribute to the development and progression of a variety of tumor types (1). Notably, amplification of the erbB2 gene is observed in 25-30% of breast cancer patients, and overexpression of the ErbB2 protein correlates with earlier relapse and poor prognosis (2, 3). Numerous studies with cultured cells suggest that overexpression of the ErbB2 protein is sufficient to activate its protein-tyrosine kinase activity, which is necessary for ErbB2-induced cellular transformation. ErbB2 overexpression in the mouse mammary gland is sufficient to induce the formation of metastatic tumors (4), underscoring the functional importance of ErbB2 in tumor development. These observations have pointed to a central role for ErbB2 in breast tumor initiation and progression, and ErbB2-directed antibody and small molecule inhibitors are currently employed clinically in the treatment of breast cancer (5, 6).Members of the ErbB family take part in a complex array of combinatorial interactions through the formation homoand heterodimers between the different family members, which in turn activate distinct signaling pathways (7-10). It has been suggested that signaling by the ErbB2-ErbB3 heterodimer is the most potent of the 10 ErbB receptor dimeric complexes (11), and the ErbB2-ErbB3 complex is a proposed oncogenic unit (12). Recent evidence supports a central role for ErbB3 in ErbB2-amplified breast cancer (13), and several reports point to roles for ErbB3 activation in mediating resistance to can...

No abstract