PURPOSE: The prognosis of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is worse than that of young patients. An attenuated dose of chemotherapy—cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab (R-miniCHOP)—is a good compromise between efficacy and safety in very elderly patients. In combination with R-CHOP (R2-CHOP), lenalidomide has an acceptable level of toxicity and may mitigate the negative prognosis of the non–germinal center B-cell–like phenotype. The Lymphoma Study association conducted a multicentric, phase III, open-label, randomized trial to compare R-miniCHOP and R2-miniCHOP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients of age 80 years or older with untreated DLBCL were randomly assigned into the R-miniCHOP21 group or the R2-miniCHOP21 group for six cycles and stratified according to CD10 expression and age. The first cycle of rituximab was delivered by IV on D1 after a prephase and then delivered subcutaneously on D1 of cycles 2-6. Lenalidomide was delivered at a dose of 10 mg once daily on D1-D14 of each cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 249 patients with new DLBCL were randomly assigned (127 R-miniCHOP and 122 R2-miniCHOP). The median age was 83 years (range, 80-96), and 55% of the patients were classified as non-GCB. The delivered dose for each R-miniCHOP compound was similar in both arms. Over a median follow-up of 25.1 months, the intention-to-treat analysis revealed that R2-miniCHOP did not improve OS (2-year OS 66% in R-miniCHOP and 65.7% in R2-miniCHOP arm, P = .98) in the overall population or in the non-GCB population. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 53% of patients with R-miniCHOP and in 81% of patients with R2-miniCHOP. CONCLUSION: The addition of lenalidomide to R-miniCHOP does not improve OS. Rituximab delivered subcutaneously was safe in this population.

Introduction The French health agency granted access to KTE-X19 in its early access program (French ATUs) for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) who failed after at least one line of chemoimmunotherapy and Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. DESCAR-T is the French national registry for all patients treated with CAR-T cells (commercial or early access program). DESCAR-T designed and sponsored by LYSA/LYSARC aims to collect "real-life" data about CAR-T cell eligible patients in all hematological malignancies. We report the first results of "real-life" use of KTE-X19 in R/R MCL. Methods. All patients with MCL and registered in DESCAR-T were eligible for the present study. The data collection started at time of the medical decision to treat with KTE-X19. All patients gave informed consent before DESCAR-T registration. Response was determined by investigators per the Lugano criteria. CAR-T cells were monitored in peripheral blood samples of 14 patients by multiparametric flow cytometry routine procedures, using the biotinylated CD19 CAR detection reagent (Miltenyi Biotec©). Results Our study started at the beginning of the French early access program on January 7 th 2020 until data extraction on June 18 th 2021. A total of 57 patients were registered, including 6 commercial use registrations of KTE-X19 (after the end of early access program). KTE-X19 product has been ordered for 55 patients of whom 47 have been infused with CAR-T cells. KTE-X19 was not ordered in 2 cases because of patient decision. It was not infused in 8 patients because of disease progression (n=3), manufacturing failure (n=3), cardiac disease (n=1) and uncontrolled infection (n=1). At the time of registration in DESCAR-T, median age of infused patients was 67 years (range 45-79), 93.6% of patients were male. Median number of prior lines of treatment was 3 (range 2-8) with 34% of autologous stem cell transplant. Initial Ki67 was high (>30%) in 78.6% of patients, 52.4% of patients had elevated LDH and 21.1% had a poor performance status (PS≥2) at inclusion.Median time between CAR-T order and infusion was 56 days (range 35-134) and 87.2% of patients had a bridging therapy. Median follow-up since CAR-T administration was 3.3 months (range 0-12.6). The best overall response rate for the 42 patients with at least one efficacy evaluation was 88%, including CR in 61.9%. PFS calculated from KTE-X19 infusion at 6 months was 57.9% (Figure A) and median duration of 5.3 months. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 78.7% of patients and a neurotoxicity in 48.9%. Transfer in ICU was needed in 27.7% of patients, with a median duration of hospitalization of 5 days. CRS or neurotoxicity of ≥ grade 3 were seen in 4 patients (8.5%), one patient presented both AEs. Among the 47 infused patients, 5 died, 4 of progressive disease and 1 of grade 5 CRS. Cellular kinetics parameters including area under the curve (AUC) representing the exposure from day 0 to day 28 (Figure B), maximal expansion post infusion (C MAX, Figure C) and time to maximal expansion (T MAX, Figure D) are shown. We observed a statistical trend to a shorter T MAX in responders. Conclusion This first analysis of "real-life" use of KTE-X19 supports results of clinical trials using CAR-T cells in R/R MCL. The safety profile and the overall response rate are also in line with previously published data. Taken together, the present "real-life" study experience supports the use of KTE-X19 in R/R MCL who failed after BTKi. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Herbaux: Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Di Blasi: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bachy: Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Daiishi: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Cartron: Roche, Celgene-BMS: Consultancy; Danofi, Gilead, Novartis, Jansen, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Abbvie, Takeda: Honoraria. Ysebaert: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Bouabdallah: Abbvie: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses. Casasnovas: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dulery: Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Gilead: Other: Travel support and registration fees for scientific meetings . Morschhauser: AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZenenca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Houot: MSD: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Jsnssen: Honoraria; CHU Rennes: Current Employment; Celgene: Honoraria.

and to guide post-CAR-T management in lymphoma. While patients achieving early DS 1-2 remission show excellent long-term outcomes, patients with DS 3-4 might benefit from combination approaches within clinical trials to increase the chance of ongoing remission.Patients with DS 5 response had dismal outcome in our cohort and should be regarded primary treatment failure for which early therapeutic intervention might be warranted.

Working conditions and risk exposure of employees whose occupations require driving on public roads-Factorial analysis and classification