Background
Although integrase inhibitor (INI)-based regimens are now the first-line choice for all people living with HIV, experience among children and adolescents is still scarce. We describe the characteristics and outcomes of a paediatric/adolescent cohort on INI-based ART.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of HIV-infected patients below 18 years of age who started an INI-based regimen from 2007 to 2019, enrolled in the Spanish National Adult (CoRIS) and Paediatric (CoRISpe) cohorts. Resistance mutations were identified by the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database.
Results
Overall, 318 INI-based regimens were implemented in 288 patients [53.8% female; median age at start of 14.3 years (IQR 12.0–16.3)]. Most were born in Spain (69.1%), vertically infected (87.7%) and treatment-experienced (92.7%). The most frequently prescribed INI was dolutegravir (134; 42.1%), followed by raltegravir (110; 34.6%) and elvitegravir (73; 23.0%). The median exposure was 2.0 years (IQR 1.1–3.0). The main reasons to start an INI-based therapy were treatment simplification (54.4%) and virological failure (34.3%). In total, 103 (32.4%) patients interrupted their regimen: 14.5% for simplification and 8.5% due to virological failure. Most subjects who received dolutegravir (85.8%) and elvitegravir (83.6%) did not interrupt their regimen and maintained undetectable viral load. There were only five virological failures with dolutegravir and three with elvitegravir. There were no interruptions related to adverse events. Seven patients with virological failure presented major resistance mutations to INIs; none of them were on dolutegravir.
Conclusions
INI-based regimens were effective and safe for HIV treatment in children and adolescents. Dolutegravir and elvitegravir presented an excellent profile, and most patients achieved and maintained viral suppression.
To the Editor, The management of parapneumonic pleural effusion and pleural empyema (PPE/PE) is controversial. [1][2][3] Although fibrinolytics are considered to have similar efficacy to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, 4,5 it is unknown when a drainage procedure for PPE/PE is beneficial, and many patients recover satisfactorily with antibiotic treatment alone. [6][7][8] Because of the potential severity and possible need for interventional procedures, pediatric patients with PPE/PE are often transferred to tertiary referral centers for treatment. The two hospitals
Objective: Late presenters (LP) for HIV care are associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. Our aim was to describe the characteristics associated with LP among adolescents in Spain. Identification of particular features may help in the design of strategies for improvement.Methods: Late-presenting adolescents diagnosed at 12-19 years of age and enrolled in the Spanish paediatric and adult HIV/AIDS cohorts (CoRIS-CoR-ISpe) from 2004 to 2019 were selected. LP were defined as those presenting
Pleural drainage was differently performed in two similar neighboring
hospitals (32.0 % vs. 58.2 %, p < 0.001), but the length of
stay was shorter in the hospital using a more conservative approach
(median 12 days vs. 18 days, p < 0.001). This result seemed
unrelated to severity but associated with the shorter duration of
intravenous treatment. This study adds to previous reports suggesting
that pleural drainage is unnecessary in many cases; controlled studies
are needed to determine which patients may actually benefit from its
use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.