This book analyzes the minority rights legal regimes in India, China, Malaysia, and Singapore, and places the discussion in the context of a wider debate on human rights in Asia. It takes a multi-disciplinary approach, including comparative constitutional analysis, international relations, and social and cultural anthropology. The book contains detailed case studies, which are supported by critical commentary. India and China, the world's most populous states, face similar problems vis-à-vis minorities, yet tackle these using starkly different techniques. Malaysia and Singapore, vocal in their articulation of ‘Asian Values’, have taken opposing stances over minority rights. Malaysia has sought to establish Malay hegemony using minority rights tools in favour of the majority, while Singapore deliberately adopted a doctrine of meritocracy, nonetheless emphasising ethnic fault-lines within its population. Together the four states reflect not only the complex layers of culture and identity within Asian states, but also the vastly different political systems and contrasting conceptions of the role of law in the continent. Through its examination of minority rights theory and its application in specific cases, this book provides a useful comparative model for the assessment of other states within Asia, thereby taking an important first step towards understanding the situation of minorities within the entire continent.
This chapter begins by presenting a historical background on the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups in India. It seeks to outline the role played by the British, in terms of setting out the blueprint for later reforms as well as, in the eyes of some commentators, sowing the seeds of discontent among India's population. The second section identifies the minorities in India, drawing on the constitutional enunciation of these: namely, those based on religion and language, and supplementing these with an overview of the plight of the SC/ST. The third section focuses on the substantive content of Indian minority rights law. The analysis is based on constitutional provisions (including the challenges where appropriate) and specific statutes, notably in the context of Muslim personal law. The final section highlights the remedies that exist, along with their uncertain results in accommodating and seeking to build a modern young democracy with a strong national identity, while accommodating diversity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.