Background The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in uropathogens has generated interest in the use of nitrofurantoin in controversial populations, such as in males and in those with renal dysfunction. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of nitrofurantoin for the treatment of cystitis in males and females with variable degrees of renal dysfunction. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted in adult patients who received nitrofurantoin for acute cystitis in the outpatient setting. The primary outcome was clinical cure compared between males and females and across various renal function groups (CrCl > 60 mL/min, 30-60 mL/min, and < 30 mL/min) following nitrofurantoin treatment. The secondary outcome was adverse events. Results A total of 446 patients were included with 278 females and 168 males. Overall clinical cure rate was 86.5% [95% CI 83.0, 89.4%] (n=386). Clinical cure rate did not vary between genders (OR 0.6 [95% CI 0.35, 1.04], p=0.085) or between patients who have a CrCl > 60 mL/min compared to those with CrCl 30-60 mL/min (OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.40, 2.44], p=1). The one patient with a CrCl < 30 mL/min was not included in the analysis. A history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (OR 0.5 [95% CI 0.26, 0.99], p=0.045) or cirrhosis (OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.06, 0.82], p=0.025) was associated with decreased odds of clinical cure. Adverse events occurred in 2% (n=9) of patients. Conclusions There was no statistically significant difference in clinical cure with nitrofurantoin between genders and various renal functions.
No abstract
Background Patient and treatment-related factors have been used to stratify COVID-19 outcomes; however, studies in the general population and specifically veterans have yielded variable results. This study was designed to assess how baseline characteristics and interventions correlate with clinical outcomes in patients admitted with COVID-19 at a large academic Veterans Affairs hospital. Methods Retrospective chart review was conducted on veterans admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 between March 1 to December 31, 2020. Veterans without respiratory symptoms attributed to COVID-19 or enrolled in a COVID-19 clinical trial were excluded. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality up to 28 days. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, discharge to higher level of care or remained in the hospital within 28 days, and discharge with new oxygen requirement within 28 days. Patient characteristics and therapeutic interventions were assessed for correlation with primary and secondary outcomes. Results Of 497 hospitalized patients reviewed, 293 were included for analysis; 94% were male; average age was 68 years with 64.9% of veterans greater than 65 years of age; 43.7% were Black; 17.4% were Hispanic. In-hospital mortality at 28-days and 90-day mortality were 18.1% and 21.5%, respectively. At discharge, 34.1% had a new oxygen requirement and 17.5% went to a higher level of care. Patients that died in-hospital were more likely to be greater than 65 years of age (p< 0.001), Hispanic (p=0.007), have chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p=0.005), be admitted to ICU (p< 0.001); receive dexamethasone (p< 0.001), convalescent plasma (p< 0.001), or antibiotics (p< 0.001); require mechanical ventilation (p< 0.001); or have new onset atrial fibrillation (p< 0.001). Veterans also had higher levels of inflammatory markers within 48 hours of hospital admission (see Table 2) and longer length of hospital stay (< 0.001). There was a trend for patients that died in the hospital within 28-days to be less likely to be Black (p=0.06). Table 1. Primary and Secondary Outcomes of Study Population (n=293) Table 2. Patient Characteristics Stratified by Primary Outcome Table 3. Characteristics of the Patients that Survived to Discharge Stratified by Secondary Outcome Measures Conclusion Patients were more likely to die in-hospital within 28-days if they were greater than 65 years of age, Hispanic and had CKD. Veterans that died in-hospital within 28-days had higher inflammatory marker levels and were more likely to receive COVID-19 treatments. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Background Nitrofurantoin has been used to treat cystitis in women; however, data supporting its use in men is lacking. In addition, recent retrospective studies have challenged the manufacturer’s recommendation to avoid nitrofurantoin with creatinine clearances (CrCl) less than 60 mL/min. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of nitrofurantoin for the treatment of acute cystitis in male and female veterans with variable degrees of renal dysfunction. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted in adult patients who received nitrofurantoin for acute cystitis in the outpatient setting between May 1, 2018 and May 1, 2019. The primary outcomes were rates of clinical cure as compared between males and females, and across various renal function groups (CrCl greater than 60 mL/min, 30 to 60 mL/min, and less than 30 mL/min) following treatment with nitrofurantoin. The secondary outcome was adverse event rates. Results A total of 446 patients were included with 278 females and 168 males. Overall clinical cure rate was 86.5% (n=386). Clinical cure rate did not vary between genders (p=0.0851) or CrCl ranges (p=1.0) as shown in the tables. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) was associated with decreased odds of clinical cure (OR 0.50 [95% CI 0.26-0.97], p=0.0404) in addition to cirrhosis (OR 0.22 [95% CI 0.06-0.91], p=0.0357). Adverse events occurred in 2% of patients and did not vary based on gender or renal function. RATES OF CLINICAL CURE Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference in clinical cure with nitrofurantoin between genders and various renal impairments. However, history of BPH and cirrhosis were associated with decreased efficacy. Subgroup analysis also revealed lower efficacy in males with CrCl greater than 60 mL/min versus females with similar renal function. This study adds to the growing body of literature suggesting that renal dysfunction with CrCl of 30 to 60 mL/min may not carry the risk of treatment failure and adverse effects previously associated with nitrofurantoin, but large randomized trials are needed to confirm these results. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.