Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four TaqMan RT‐PCR assays with a commonly used nested RT‐PCR and to include the Feline calicivirus (FCV) as an internal control.
Methods and Results: RNA extracted from 87 swine faecal samples and 103 swine blood samples was subjected to different detection systems. Faecal samples naturally contaminated with Hepatitis E virus (HEV) and negative samples were artificially inoculated with 3·2 × 103 PFU of FCV. Detection results obtained on faecal and plasma samples were 35·6% and 4·9% with the nested RT‐PCR assay, 8·0% and 0%, 0% and 0%, 13·8% and 0% and 36·8% and 3·9% with TaqMan systems A, B, C and D respectively. The Ct means obtained with the multiplex TaqMan assay were 30·11 and 30·43 for the detection of FCV with HEV contaminated samples and negative samples.
Conclusions: The TaqMan system D was more suitable for the detection of swine HEV strains than the three others and FCV was integrated successfully as an internal control.
Significance and Impact of the Study: FCV was demonstrated as an efficient control to monitor the RNA extraction process and HEV amplification procedure in a multiplex HEV/FCV TaqMan assay. This control would be helpful in limiting false negative results.
To replace benzoyl peroxide as a bread dough‐bleaching agent, pure and commercial oxido‐reductases (peroxidases, catalases, glucose oxidases, lipoxygenase, and laccase) were screened based on degradation of β‐carotene in a liquid system (5 μg of β‐carotene/mL of 0.1M citrate phosphate buffer at pH 5.5 or 6.5) or dough. Peroxidases had the best bleaching activity; some catalases also showed bleaching potential in a liquid system but not in bread dough, suggesting that screening enzymes in liquid media has limited application for dough. In 100 g of flour, combinations of peroxidase (3,000 U), lipase (815–1,630 U), and linoleic acid (0–300 mg) completely bleached bread dough.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.