The structure of the two-domain response regulator PrrA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis shows a compact structure in the crystal with a well defined interdomain interface. The interface, which does not include the interdomain linker, makes the recognition helix and the trans-activation loop of the effector domain inaccessible for interaction with DNA. Part of the interface involves hydrogen-bonding interactions of a tyrosine residue in the receiver domain that is believed to be involved in signal transduction, which, if disrupted, would destabilize the interdomain interface, allowing a more extended conformation of the molecule, which would in turn allow access to the recognition helix. In solution, there is evidence for an equilibrium between compact and extended forms of the protein that is far toward the compact form when the protein is inactivated but moves toward a more extended form when activated by the cognate sensor kinase PrrB.The use of regulatory systems to sense and respond to changing environmental conditions is an intrinsic feature that enables bacteria to survive and adapt to a variety of external challenges. Two-component signaling (TCS) 2 systems are the principle mechanism used by bacteria to perform this task (1). A typical TCS consists of a sensor histidine kinase and a response regulator (RR). Histidine kinases are usually membrane-anchored proteins with a characteristic core consisting of a histidine-containing dimerization domain and a catalytic domain. In response to extracellular, and in a few cases, intracellular, conditions, the histidine kinase autophosphorylates at a histidine residue, usually in the dimerization domain, by phosphotransfer from the catalytic (ATPase) domain of the adjacent protomer. It then acts as a phosphodonor to a universally conserved aspartic acid residue in the response regulator. RRs typically consist of two domains with the N-terminal (receiver) domain being the phosphoacceptor domain and the C-terminal domain being the effector. The effector domain is, in most cases, DNA binding and is involved in transcriptional regulation of the genes necessary to respond to the sensed environment. Phosphorylation of the aspartic acid residue located in the receiver domain activates the effector domain in a manner that is still incompletely understood, not least because there is little structural information on full-length response regulators and no structural information on activated full-length (i.e. multidomain) response regulators.TCSs have been identified as potential antibacterial targets because they play a key role in controlling cellular processes (2). The lack of these systems in higher eukaryotes makes them potentially selective and unique antibacterial drug targets, There is, however, little biochemical information available on the TCSs of pathogenic bacteria such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MtB). The H37Rv strain of MtB has 12 putative TCSs including the recently discovered Rv3220-Rv1626 pair (3) as well as five putative orphan response regulator and se...

The 5′ cap consists of 7-methyl­guanosine (m7G) linked by a 5′–5′-triphosphate bridge to messenger RNA (mRNA) and acts as the master regulator of mRNA turnover and translation initiation in eukaryotes. Cap analogues that influence mRNA translation and turnover (either as small molecules or as part of an RNA transcript) are valuable tools for studying gene expression, which is often also of therapeutic relevance. Here, we synthesized a series of 15 dinucleotide cap (m7GpppG) analogues containing a 5′-phosphoro­thiolate (5′-PSL) moiety (i.e., an O-to-S substitution within the 5′-phospho­ester) and studied their biological properties in the context of three major cap-binding proteins: translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and two decapping enzymes, DcpS and Dcp2. While the 5′-PSL moiety was neutral or slightly stabilizing for cap interactions with eIF4E, it significantly influenced susceptibility to decapping. Replacing the γ-phospho­ester with the 5′-PSL moiety (γ-PSL) prevented β-γ-pyrophosphate bond cleavage by DcpS and conferred strong inhibitory properties. Combining the γ-PSL moiety with α-PSL and β-phosphoro­thioate (PS) moiety afforded first cap-derived hDcpS inhibitor with low nanomolar potency. Susceptibility to Dcp2 and translational properties were studied after incorporation of the new analogues into mRNA transcripts by RNA polymerase. Transcripts containing the γ-PSL moiety were resistant to cleavage by Dcp2. Surprisingly, superior translational properties were observed for mRNAs containing the α-PSL moiety, which were Dcp2-susceptible. The overall protein expression measured in HeLa cells for this mRNA was comparable to mRNA capped with the translation augmenting β-PS analogue reported previously. Overall, our study highlights 5′-PSL as a synthetically accessible cap modification, which, depending on the substitution site, can either reduce susceptibility to decapping or confer superior translational properties on the mRNA. The 5′-PSL-analogues may find application as reagents for the preparation of efficiently expressed mRNA or for investigation of the role of decapping enzymes in mRNA processing or neuromuscular disorders associated with decapping.

Staphylococcus simulans lysostaphin cleaves pentaglycine cross-bridges between stem peptides in the peptidoglycan of susceptible staphylococci, including S. aureus . This enzyme consists of an N-terminal catalytic domain and a cell wall binding domain (SH3b), which anchors the protein to peptidoglycan. Although structures of SH3bs from lysostaphin are available, the binding modes of peptidoglycan to these domains are still unclear. We have solved the crystal structure of the lysostaphin SH3b domain in complex with a pentaglycine peptide representing the peptidoglycan cross-bridge. The structure identifies a groove between β1 and β2 strands as the pentaglycine binding site. The structure suggests that pentaglycine specificity of the SH3b arises partially directly by steric exclusion of Cβ atoms in the ligand and partially indirectly due to the selection of main chain conformations that are easily accessible for glycine, but not other amino acid residues. We have revealed further interactions of SH3b with the stem peptides with the support of bioinformatics tools. Based on the structural data we have attempted engineering of the domain specificity and have investigated the relevance of the introduced substitutions on the domain binding and specificity, also in the contexts of the mature lysostaphin and of its bacteriolytic activity.

A key step in proliferation of retroviruses is the conversion of their RNA genome to double-stranded DNA, a process catalysed by multifunctional reverse transcriptases (RTs). Dimeric and monomeric RTs have been described, the latter exemplified by the enzyme of Moloney murine leukaemia virus. However, structural information is lacking that describes the substrate binding mechanism for a monomeric RT. We report here the first crystal structure of a complex between an RNA/DNA hybrid substrate and polymerase-connection fragment of the single-subunit RT from xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus, a close relative of Moloney murine leukaemia virus. A comparison with p66/p51 human immunodeficiency virus-1 RT shows that substrate binding around the polymerase active site is conserved but differs in the thumb and connection subdomains. Small-angle X-ray scattering was used to model full-length xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus RT, demonstrating that its mobile RNase H domain becomes ordered in the presence of a substrate—a key difference between monomeric and dimeric RTs.