No abstract

Variations of complexity can be measured with a greater statistical power over short series using LSampEn especially when nonlinear features are present.

The arm of the baroreflex (BR) controlling peripheral resistances (PR), labeled as BR of PR (prBR), was characterized through an extension of the cardiac BR (cBR) sequence analysis. The method exploits recordings of skin blood flow (SBF) from the palm of the non-dominant hand via a laser Doppler flowmeter and of arterial pressure (AP) from the middle finger of the same hand via a plethysmographic device. PR was estimated beat-by-beat as the ratio of mean AP to mean SBF computed over the same heart period (HP). Peripheral resistances-diastolic arterial pressure (PR-DAP) sequences featuring simultaneous increases of PR and decreases of diastolic AP (DAP) or vice versa were identified and the slope of the regression line in the (DAP, PR) plane was taken as an estimate of prBR sensitivity (BRSprBR). The percentage of prBR sequences (SEQ%prBR) was taken as a measure of prBR involvement and the prBR effectiveness index (EIprBR) was computed as the fraction of DAP sequences capable to drive antiparallel PR variations. Analogous markers were computed over cBR from HP and systolic AP (SAP) variability [i.e., cBR sensitivity (BRScBR), percentage of cBR sequences (SEQ%cBR), and effectiveness index of the cBR (EIcBR)]. prBR and cBR were typified during incremental light-to-moderate bicycle ergometer exercise at 10, 20, and 30% of the maximum effort in 16 healthy subjects (aged from 22 to 58 years, six males). We found that: (i) BRScBR decreased gradually with the challenge, while BRSprBR declined only at the heaviest workload; (ii) SEQ%cBR decreased solely at the lightest workload, while the decline of SEQ%prBR was significant regardless of the intensity of the challenge; (iii) EIprBR and EIcBR were not affected by exercise; (iv) after pooling together all the data regardless of the experimental conditions, BRSprBR and BRScBR were uncorrelated, while SEQ%cBR and SEQ%prBR as well as EIcBR and EIprBR, were significantly and positively correlated; (v) when the correlation between SEQ%cBR and SEQ%prBR and between EIcBR and EIprBR was assessed separately in each experimental condition, it was not systematically detected. This study suggests that prBR characterization provides information complementary to cBR that might be fruitfully exploited to improve patients’ risk stratification.

Hysteresis of the baroreflex (BR) is the result of the different BR sensitivity (BRS) when arterial pressure (AP) rises or falls. This phenomenon has been poorly studied and almost exclusively examined by applying pharmacological challenges and static approaches disregarding causal relations. This study inspects the asymmetry of the cardiac BR (cBR) and vascular sympathetic BR (sBR) in physiological closed loop conditions from spontaneous fluctuations of physiological variables, namely heart period (HP) and systolic AP (SAP) leading to the estimation of cardiac BRS (cBRS) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and diastolic AP (DAP) leading to the estimation of vascular sympathetic BRS (sBRS). The assessment was carried out in 12 young healthy subjects undergoing incremental head-up tilt with table inclination gradually increased from 0 to 60°. Two analytical methods were exploited and compared, namely the sequence (SEQ) and phase-rectified signal averaging (PRSA) methods. SEQ analysis is based on the detection of joint causal schemes representing the HP and MSNA burst rate delayed responses to spontaneous SAP and DAP modifications, respectively. PRSA analysis averages HP and MSNA burst rate patterns after aligning them according to the direction of SAP and DAP changes, respectively. Since cBRSs were similar when SAP went up or down, hysteresis of cBR was not detected. Conversely, hysteresis of sBR was evident with sBRS more negative when DAP was falling than rising. sBR hysteresis was no longer visible during sympathetic activation induced by the orthostatic challenge. These results were obtained via the SEQ method, while the PRSA technique appeared to be less powerful in describing the BR asymmetry due to the strong association between BRS estimates computed over positive and negative AP variations. This study suggests that cBR and sBR provide different information about the BR control, sBR exhibits more relevant non-linear features that are evident even during physiological changes of AP, and the SEQ method can be fruitfully exploited to characterize the BR hysteresis with promising applications to BR branches different from cBR and sBR.

In heart period (HP) variability (HPV) recordings the percentage of negative HP variations tends to be greater than that of positive ones and this pattern is referred to as HPV asymmetry (HPVA). HPVA has been studied in several experimental conditions in healthy and pathological populations, but its origin is unclear. The baroreflex (BR) exhibits an asymmetric behavior as well given that it reacts more importantly to positive than negative arterial pressure (AP) variations. We tested the hypothesis that the BR asymmetry (BRA) is a HPVA determinant over spontaneous fluctuations of HP and systolic AP (SAP). We studied 100 healthy subjects (age from 21 to 70 yr, 54 men) comprising 20 subjects in each age decade. Electrocardiogram and noninvasive AP were recorded for 15 min at rest in supine position (REST) and during active standing (STAND). The HPVA was evaluated via Porta’s index and Guzik’s index, while the BRA was assessed as the difference, and normalized difference, between BR sensitivities computed over positive and negative SAP variations via the sequence method applied to HP and SAP variability. HPVA significantly increased during STAND and decreased progressively with age. BRA was not significantly detected both at REST and during STAND. However, we found a significant positive association between BRA and HPVA markers during STAND persisting even within the age groups. This study supports the use of HPVA indexes as descriptors of BRA and identified a challenge soliciting the BR response like STAND to maximize the association between HPVA and BRA markers.