No abstract

Optimizing skill acquisition during novel motor tasks and regaining lost motor functions have been the interest of many researchers over the past few decades. One approach shown to accelerate motor learning involves haptically coupling two individuals through robotic interfaces. Studies have shown that an individual's solo performance during upper-limb tracking tasks may improve after haptically-coupled training with a partner. In this study, our goal was to investigate whether these findings can be translated to lower-limb motor tasks, more specifically, during an ankle position tracking task. Using one-degreeof-freedom ankle movements, pairs of participants (i.e., dyads) tracked target trajectories independently. Participants alternated between tracking trials with and without haptic coupling, achieved by rendering a virtual spring between two ankle rehabilitation robots. In our analysis, we compared changes in task performance across trials while training with and without haptic coupling. The tracking performance of both individuals (i.e., dyadic task performance) improved during haptic coupling, which was likely due to averaging of random errors of the dyadic pair during tracking. However, we found that dyadic haptic coupling did not lead to faster individual learning for the tracking task. These results suggest that haptic coupling between unimpaired individuals may not be an effective method of This paragraph of the first footnote will contain the date on which you submitted your paper for review.

Background Human-human (HH) interaction mediated by machines (e.g., robots or passive sensorized devices), which we call human-machine-human (HMH) interaction, has been studied with increasing interest in the last decade. The use of machines allows the implementation of different forms of audiovisual and/or physical interaction in dyadic tasks. HMH interaction between two partners can improve the dyad’s ability to accomplish a joint motor task (task performance) beyond either partner’s ability to perform the task solo. It can also be used to more efficiently train an individual to improve their solo task performance (individual motor learning). We review recent research on the impact of HMH interaction on task performance and individual motor learning in the context of motor control and rehabilitation, and we propose future research directions in this area. Methods A systematic search was performed on the Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed databases. The search query was designed to find studies that involve HMH interaction in motor control and rehabilitation settings. Studies that do not investigate the effect of changing the interaction conditions were filtered out. Thirty-one studies met our inclusion criteria and were used in the qualitative synthesis. Results Studies are analyzed based on their results related to the effects of interaction type (e.g., audiovisual communication and/or physical interaction), interaction mode (collaborative, cooperative, co-active, and competitive), and partner characteristics. Visuo-physical interaction generally results in better dyadic task performance than visual interaction alone. In cases where the physical interaction between humans is described by a spring, there are conflicting results as to the effect of the stiffness of the spring. In terms of partner characteristics, having a more skilled partner improves dyadic task performance more than having a less skilled partner. However, conflicting results were observed in terms of individual motor learning. Conclusions Although it is difficult to draw clear conclusions as to which interaction type, mode, or partner characteristic may lead to optimal task performance or individual motor learning, these results show the possibility for improved outcomes through HMH interaction. Future work that focuses on selecting the optimal personalized interaction conditions and exploring their impact on rehabilitation settings may facilitate the transition of HMH training protocols to clinical implementations.