A marked pH-dependent interaction with F-actin is an important property of typical members of the actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family of abundant actin-binding proteins. ADF/cofilins tend to bind to F-actin with a ratio of 1 : 1 at pH values around 6.5, and to G-actin at pH 8.0. We have investigated the mechanism for the pH-sensitivity. We found no evidence for pH-dependent changes in the structure of cofilin itself, nor for the interaction of cofilin with G-actin. None of the actin-derived, cofilin-binding peptides that we had previously identified [Renoult, C., Ternent, D., Maciver, S.K., Fattoum, A., Astier, C., Benyamin, Y. & Roustan, C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28893-28899] bound cofilin in a pH-sensitive manner. However, we have detected a conformational change in region 75-105 in the actin subdomain 1 by the use of a peptide-directed antibody. A pH-dependent conformational change has also been detected spectroscopically in a similar peptide (84-103) on binding to cofilin. These results are consistent with a model in which pH-dependent motion of subdomain 1 relative to subdomain 2 (through region 75-105) of actin reveals a second cofilin binding site on actin (centered around region 112-125) that allows ADF/cofilin association with the actin filament. This motion requires salt in addition to low pH.

Gelsolin is an abundant calcium dependent actin filament severing and capping protein. In the absence of calcium the molecule is compact but in the presence of calcium, as its six similar domains alter their relative position, a generally more open configuration is adopted to reveal the three actin binding sites. It is generally held that a Ôhelical-latchÕ at the C-terminus of gelsolin's domain 6 (G6), binds domain 2 (G2) to keep gelsolin in the calcium-free compact state, and that the crutial calcium binding site(s) reside in the C-terminal half of gelsolin perhaps involving the C-terminal helix itself has to be bound to release this latch. Here we provide evidence for a calcium dependent conformational change within G2 (K d ¼ 15 lM). We also report a calcium dependent binding site for the C-terminus (G4-6) within G2 and delimit this further to a specific region formed by residues 203-225 and 159-193. It is known that the activation of gelsolin involves multiple calcium binding events (around 6) the first of which (in G6) may release the latch. We propose that the calcium-dependent conformational change in G2 may be a subsequent step that is necessary for the dissociation of G2 from G4-6, and that this movement occurs in sympathy with calcium induced conformational changes within G6 by the physical coupling of the two calcium binding sites within G2 and G6. Additional calcium binding in other domains then result in the complete opening and activation of the gelsolin molecule.

Gelsolin is a multidomain and multifunction protein that nucleates the assembly of filaments and severs them. The activation of gelsolin by calcium is a multistep process involving many calcium binding sites that act to unfold the molecule from a tight structure to a more loose form in which three actin‐binding sites become exposed. Low pH is also known to activate gelsolin, in the absence of calcium and this too results in an unfolding of the molecule. Less is known how pH‐activation occurs but we show that there are significant differences in the mechanisms that lead to activation. Crucially, while it is known that the bonds between G2 and G6 are broken by co‐operative occupancy of calcium binding sites in both domains [Lagarrique, E., Maciver, S. K., Fattoum, A., Benyamin, Y. & Roustan, C. (2003) Eur. J. Biochem. 270, 2236–2243.], pH values that activate gelsolin do not result in a weakening of the G2‐G6 bonds. We report the existence of pH‐dependent conformational changes within G2 and in G4–6 that differ from those induced by calcium, and that low pH overrides the requirement for calcium for actin‐binding within G4–6 to a modest extent so that a Kd of 1 µm is measured, compared to 30–40 nm in the presence of calcium. Whereas the pH‐dependent conformational change in G2 is possibly different from the change induced by calcium, the changes measured in G4–6 appear to be similar in both calcium and low pH.