Background The poliovirus receptor (CD155) is expressed ubiquitously at low levels on both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells, but its expression is upregulated in various tumor cells. An activating receptor DNAM-1 expressed on cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells binds to CD155 and mediates the cytotoxic activity of CTLs and NK cells against tumors. Unlike mouse tissues, human tissues express a soluble form of CD155 (sCD155), which is a splicing isoform of CD155 lacking the transmembrane region. We previously reported that the serum levels of sCD155 were higher in lung, gastrointestinal, breast, and gynecologic cancer patients than in healthy donors. Here, we focus on breast cancer patients. Methods To analyze the association between serum level of sCD155 and clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer, we quantified sCD155 in the sera of 153 breast cancer patients by sandwich ELISA. Results sCD155 levels in the sera of breast cancer patients were positively correlated with patient age, disease stage, and invasive tumor size. Moreover, they were higher in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative cancers than in those with ER-positive tumors, and higher in those with Ki-67-high cancers than in those with Ki-67-low cancers. Conclusions The serum level of sCD155 is correlated with high risk factors in breast cancer.
Giant cell tumors of soft tissue (GCT-ST) arising in the breast are extremely rare. Herein, we report a case of a 45-year-old woman with a 5-cm mass in her left breast. Ultrasonography revealed a mainly well-circumscribed mass that contained a cystic lesion. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a fibrous capsule-covered mass that contained a high-intensity area, suggesting hemorrhaging. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) revealed mononuclear histiocytic cells with a round shape or spindled appearance that was mixed with multinucleated giant cells. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed CD68-positive staining in the mononuclear and giant cells but negative staining for pancytokeratin. Preoperatively, the tumor was highly suspected of being GCT-ST. Histopathological results after a left mastectomy showed similar findings to CNB. The final diagnosis was GCT-ST in the breast. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of a GCT-ST arising in the breast diagnosed by ultrasound-guided CNB.
Background: Treatment-related infertility is one of many issues facing young breast cancer patients. Fertility preservation, using artificial reproductive therapy (ART), is a recommended method to maintain future reproductive function among cancer patients. However, medical costs for fertility preservation are often too expensive for young cancer patients who can be less economically secure, in addition to the costs of cancer treatment. Moreover, the ART process requires several weeks or more, and time spent in fertility preservation may potentially delay treatment. Pink Ring is a patient advocacy group for young breast cancer patients, established in Japan in 2012, which has been working on the issue of onco-fertility. We conducted a cross sectional web-based survey exploring the economic and time-related burden of young cancer patients in the reproductive age group. This study was supported by a research grant from the Foundation to Promote Cancer Research. Method: Pink Ring conducted a web-based survey, and 343 young breast cancer patients who responded were enrolled. We performed descriptive analysis of the data. Result: Among 343 young breast cancer patients, the mean age at the time of the survey was 38 years (20-49) and the mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 34 years (20-49). At diagnosis, 167 (49%) of the women were married and 171 (50%) were single. At diagnosis, 99 (29%) women had had a child or children and 236 (63%) were childless. Regarding treatment-related infertility, 193 patients (56%) had had discussions with a medical health provider. However, 58 (17%) patients underwent a fertility preservation procedure. Among patients who underwent fertility preservation, 35 patients (60%) underwent embryo preservation, 23 (40%) underwent oocyte cryopreservation, and 4 (7%) underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation. According to medical payment for a fertility preservation procedure, 26 patients (45%) paid less than $5000, 21 patients (36%) paid between $5000 and $10000 and 10 patients (17%) paid over $10000. Regarding cost-effectiveness, 51 patients (88%) considered that the medical payment was expensive. According to the duration of the fertility preservation procedure, 7 patients (12%) were treated up to 2 weeks, 8 patients (31%) were treated between 2 and 4 weeks, 21 patients (36%) were treated between 1 and 2 months, and 7 patients (12%) were treated longer than 2 months. Twenty-eight patients (48%) answered that planned cancer treatment was delayed because of a fertility preservation procedure. According to cancer treatment delay, 4 patients (14%) were delayed up to 4 weeks, 14 patients (50%) were delayed between 1 and 2 months, and 10 patients (36%) were delayed longer than 2 months. Among 285 patients who did not proceed with fertility preservation, the major reasons given for their decision were as follows: lack of awareness regarding treatment-related infertility and fertility preservation options (29%), economic-related burden (25%), and time-related burden (25%). Discussion: This survey revealed that fertility preservation was a burden not only for economic reasons but also in terms of time required for treatment for young breast cancer patients of reproductive age. Citation Format: Kitano A, Mifune M, Suzuki A, Hashizume A, Nakayama C, Motofuji Y, Suzuki H, Ichioka E. Economic and time-related burden in young breast cancer patients wishing to preserve their fertility before undergoing cancer treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-08.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.