SO2 is enriched in oxy-fuel combustion due
to flue-gas
recycle, and a significant higher SO3 concentration can
be expected compared to air-firing. Since SO3 can cause
high and low temperature corrosion, it is important to measure the
SO3 concentration under oxy-fuel fired conditions. However,
measurement of SO3 is not straightforward, since SO3 is a highly reactive gas. This paper presents an experimental
study in the Chalmers oxy-fuel test unit, comparing different SO3 measurement techniques applied during oxy-fuel and air combustion.
Propane (60 kWth) was used as fuel and SO2 was
injected in the oxidizer to generate a controllable amount of SO3. The SO3 concentration was measured with four
techniques: the controlled condensation method, the salt method, the
isopropanol absorption bottle method, and with the Pentol SO3 monitor (previously: Severn Science analyzer). The controlled condensation
method was used as the standard for comparison. Additionally, the
acid dew-point temperature was measured with a dew-point meter. The
controlled condensation and the salt method gave comparable results,
and the repeatability with these methods was good. The SO3 concentrations measured with the Pentol SO3 monitor differed
in average less than 20% from the SO3 concentrations obtained
with the controlled condensation method. With the isopropanol absorption
bottle method, a large amount of the SO2 was absorbed in
the isopropanol solution, which gives a positive bias if the SO2 is oxidized to sulfate in the isopropanol solution. This
was minimized by reducing the measurement time, bubbling argon through
the absorption bottles after the measurement to force the SO2 out, and analyzing the solution immediately after the measurement.
No principal differences between measuring the SO3 concentration
during oxy-fuel combustion and air-firing were obtained. However,
a correction factor for the mass flow meter of the Pentol SO3 monitor has to be used because of the high CO2 concentration
during oxy-fuel operation.
In this study, an SO 3 measurement technique was evaluated and developed. In the method, a salt is used to capture gaseous SO 3 /H 2 SO 4 . Various salts were tested to evaluate the suitability to measure SO 3 /H 2 SO 4 without interference from SO 2 . Salts tested include NaCl, KCl, K 2 CO 3 , and CaCl 2 . The salts were tightly packed into a Teflon tube, and the gas was fed through the salt tube with subsequent reaction between SO 3 /H 2 SO 4 and the salt with formation of sulfates of the respective salt. After the measurement, the salt was dissolved in water, and the solution was analyzed for sulfate ions. The SO 3 /H 2 SO 4 concentration in the flue gas could then be determined because the gas volume flowing through the salt was measured together with the amount of sulfate bound in the salt. The method was tested in laboratory conditions, in a 100 kW th test unit during airfiring and oxy-fuel combustion, and in an industrial boiler. A first attempt to continuously measure SO 3 /H 2 SO 4 indirectly with an FTIR, by measuring the release of HCl in the sulfation of KCl, was also made. The conversion of SO 3 to H 2 SO 4 in flue gas conditions is discussed. It was found that at the measurement conditions almost all SO 3 is present as H 2 SO 4 . Therefore, the laboratory study was made with gaseous H 2 SO 4 instead of SO 3 . The laboratory tests showed that all salts captured all H 2 SO 4 . The best selectivity toward H 2 SO 4 was shown for NaCl and KCl; no significant amount of SO 2 was captured in these salts. An in situ implementation of the salt method using KCl as salt was used during heavy oil combustion in a Kraft recovery boiler. The salt method showed to be an accurate, inexpensive, and easy way to measure SO 3 /H 2 SO 4 in flue gases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.