Topological analysis of the electron localization function (ELF) has been carried out for the AuNgX (Ng = Ar, Kr, Xe; X = F, Cl, Br, I) molecules using the wave function approximated by the CCSD, MP2, and DFT(B3LYP, M062X) methods including zero-order regular approximation (ZORA). In the Ng-F bond, the bonding disynaptic attractor V(Ng,F) is missing; therefore, there are no signs of the covalent binding. The nature of the Au-Ng bond depends on the computational method used. Analysis of the ELF carried out for the AuArF and AuXeF molecules, with the wave function approximated by the CCSD and MP2 methods, shows the V(Au,Ng) attractor possibly corresponding to a partially covalent binding between the gold and noble gas atom. However, its very small basin population (<1e) and a very large value of the variance of the basin population suggest that the Au-Ng bond has a very delocalized character. Such bond nature may be related to the charge shift concept with a resonance of the Au(-+)NgX, Au(+-)NgX hybrids. The weakest Au-Ng bond, in terms of the smallest amount of electron density for the V(Au,Ng) basin, is found for the AuKrF molecule with the CCSD method (0.13e). The MP2 method, however, does not yield any V(Au, Ng) population; hence, the covalent Au-Kr bond is not confirmed. Because the V(Au,Ng) attractor is also not observed with the DFT method, the proper characterization of the Au-Ng bond requires proper description of correlation effects. Additional studies on the Au2 and [AuXe](+) molecules, performed at the CCSD and B3LYP levels, exhibit no V(Au,Au) and V(Au,Xe) bonding basins either.

Nature of the bonding in isolated XeOF2 molecule and F2 OXe(…) NCCH3 complexes have been studied in the gas phase (0 K) using Quantum Chemical Topology methods. The wave functions have been approximated at the MP2 and DFT levels of calculations, using the APFD, B3LYP, M062X, and B2PLYP functionals with the GD3 dispersion correction. The nature of the formal XeO bond in the XeOF2 monomer depends on the basis set used (all-electron vs. the ecp-28 approximation for Xe). Within the all-electron basis set approach the bond is represented by two bonding attractors, Vi = 1,2 (Xe,O), with total population of about 1.06e and highly delocalized electron density in both bonding basins. No bonding basins are observed using the ecp-28 approximation. These results shows that the nature of xenon-oxygen is complicated and may be described with mesomeric equilibrium of the Lewis representations: Xe((+)) O((-)) and Xe((-)) O((+)) . For both the xenon-oxygen and xenon-fluorine interactions the charge-shift model can be applied. The F2 OXe(…) NCCH3 complex exists in two structures: "parallel," stabilized by non-covalent C(…) O and Xe(…) N interactions and "linear" stabilized by the Xe(…) N interaction. Topological analysis of ELF shows that the F2 OXe(…) NCCH3 molecule appears as a weakly bound intermolecular complex. Intermolecular interaction energy components have also been studied using Symmetry Adapted Perturbation Theory. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Quantum chemistry methods have been applied to study the influence of the Xe atom inserted into the hydrogen-bromine bond (HBr → HXeBr), particularly on the nature of atomic interactions in the HBr···CO2 and HXeBr···CO2 complexes. Detailed analysis of the nature of chemical bonds has been carried out using topological analysis of the electron localization function, while topological analysis of electron density was used to gain insight into the nature of weak nonbonding interactions. Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory within the orbital approach was applied for greater understanding of the physical contributions to the total interaction energy.

Nature of bonding in the NgBeS (Ng = Ar, Kr, Xe) molecules has been studied using topological analysis of ELF, ELI-D functions with the wave function approximated at the DFT (M062X, B3LYP ? ZORA), MP2, CCSD and CASSCF level of calculations. Both Xe-Be and Be=S bonds display topological features typical for the covalent-dative bonding. The V 2 (Xe) attractor characterising electron density, involved in interaction with the beryllium atom, is closer to the C(Be) core than to C(Xe). The population of the respective basin ranges between 1.59e (B3LYP ? ZORA) and 1.83e (CCSD). The beryllium-sulphur bond is described by the bonding disynaptic basin V(Be,S) with the population between 3.22e (CASSCF) and 3.48e (M062X). The approximate weights for the Be-S and Be=S resonance forms are 0.3 and 0.7, respectively, in all molecules. Both the NgBe and BeS bonds are highly polarised with the values of the p SBe and p NgBe polarity indices (CCSD) of 0.8 and 0.9-1.0 for all studied molecules.

No abstract