Wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains producing a new killer toxin (Klus) were isolated. They killed all the previously known S. cerevisiae killer strains, in addition to other yeast species, including Kluyveromyces lactis and Candida albicans. The Klus phenotype is conferred by a medium-size double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae virus Mlus (ScV-Mlus), whose genome size ranged from 2.1 to 2.3 kb. ScV-Mlus depends on ScV-L-A for stable maintenance and replication. We cloned and sequenced Mlus. Its genome structure is similar to that of M1, M2, or M28 dsRNA, with a 5-terminal coding region followed by two internal A-rich sequences and a 3-terminal region without coding capacity. Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer strains produce and secrete protein toxins that are lethal to sensitive strains of the same or related yeast species. These toxins have been grouped into three types, K1, K2, or K28, based on their killing profiles and lack of cross-immunity. Members of each group can kill nonkiller yeasts as well as killer yeasts belonging to the other types. They are immune, however, to their own toxin or to toxins produced by strains of the same killer type (for reviews, see references 21, 32, 33, and 47).K1, K2, and K28 killer toxins are genetically encoded by medium-size double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viruses grouped into three types, M1, M2, and M28, of 1.6, 1.5, and 1.8 kb, respectively. Only one strand (the positive strand) has coding capacity. In each case, the 5Ј-end region contains an open reading frame (ORF) that codes for the toxin precursor, or preprotoxin (pptox), which also provides immunity. The three toxin-coding M dsRNAs show no sequence homology to each other (35). M viruses depend on a second large (4.6-kb) dsRNA helper virus, L-A, for maintenance and replication. L-A provides the capsids in which both L-A and M dsRNAs are separately encapsidated (reviewed by Schmitt and Breinig [33]). L-BC virus is an L-A-related virus, with a similar 4.6-kb genome size, which coexists with L-A in most killer and nonkiller S. cerevisiae strains (1, 37). L-BC shows no sequence homology with L-A, and it has no known helper activity. L-A and L-BC, however, share the same genomic organization. They code for two proteins, the major coat protein Gag and a minor Gag-Pol fusion protein translated by a Ϫ1 ribosomal frameshifting mechanism (7,10,17,26). These viruses, called Saccharomyces cerevisiae viruses (ScVs), belong to the Totiviridae family and are cytoplasmically inherited, spreading horizontally by cell-cell mating or by heterokaryon formation (47). In addition to the M dsRNA-encoded killer toxins, other S. cerevisiae killer toxins, named KHR and KHS, showing weak killer activity, are encoded on chromosomal DNA (13,14).The positive strands of both L-A and M viruses contain cis signals in their 3Ј-terminal regions essential for packaging and replication (46). The signal for transcription initiation has been proposed to be present in the first 25 nucleotides (nt) of L-A, probably in the 5Ј-terminal sequ...

Torulaspora delbrueckii is becoming widely recommended for improving some specific characteristics of wines. However, its impact on wine quality is still far from satisfactory at the winery level, mostly because it is easily replaced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae-like yeasts during must fermentation. New T. delbrueckii killer strains were here isolated and selected for winemaking. They killed S. cerevisiae yeasts and were able to dominate and complete the fermentation of sterile grape must. Sequential yeast inoculation of non-sterile white must with T. delbrueckii followed by S. cerevisiae did not ensure T. delbrueckii dominance or wine quality improvement. Only a single initial must inoculation at high cell concentrations allowed the T. delbrueckii killer strains to dominate and complete the must fermentation to reach above 11% ethanol, but not the non-killer strains. None of the wines underwent malolactic fermentation as long as the must had low turbidity and pH. Although no statistically significant differences were found in the wine quality score, the S. cerevisiae-dominated wines were preferred over the T. delbrueckii-dominated ones because the former had high-intensity fresh fruit aromas while the latter had lower intensity, but nevertheless nice and unusual dried fruit/pastry aromas. Except for ethyl propanoate and 3-ethoxy-1-propanol, which were more abundant in the T. delbrueckii–dominated wines, most of the compounds with fresh fruit odor descriptors, including those with the greatest odor activity values (isoamyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, and ethyl octanoate), were more abundant in the S. cerevisiae–dominated wines. The low relative concentrations of these fruity compounds made it possible to detect in the T. delbrueckii–dominated wines the low-relative-concentration compounds with dried fruit and pastry odors. An example was γ-ethoxy-butyrolactone which was significantly more abundant in these wines than in those dominated by S. cerevisiae.

No abstract

No abstract

Killer yeasts secrete protein toxins that are lethal to sensitive strains of the same or related yeast species. Among the four types of Saccharomyces killer yeasts already described (K1, K2, K28, and Klus), we found K2 and Klus killer yeasts in spontaneous wine fermentations from southwestern Spain. Both phenotypes were encoded by medium-size double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viruses, Saccharomyces cerevisiae virus (ScV)-M2 and ScV-Mlus, whose genome sizes ranged from 1.3 to 1.75 kb and from 2.1 to 2.3 kb, respectively. The K2 yeasts were found in all the wine-producing subareas for all the vintages analyzed, while the Klus yeasts were found in the warmer subareas and mostly in the warmer ripening/harvest seasons. The middle-size isotypes of the M2 dsRNA were the most frequent among K2 yeasts, probably because they encoded the most intense K2 killer phenotype. However, the smallest isotype of the Mlus dsRNA was the most frequent for Klus yeasts, although it encoded the least intense Klus killer phenotype. The killer yeasts were present in most (59.5%) spontaneous fermentations. Most were K2, with Klus being the minority. The proportion of killer yeasts increased during fermentation, while the proportion of sensitive yeasts decreased. The fermentation speed, malic acid, and wine organoleptic quality decreased in those fermentations where the killer yeasts replaced at least 15% of a dominant population of sensitive yeasts, while volatile acidity and lactic acid increased, and the amount of bacteria in the tumultuous and the end fermentation stages also increased in an unusual way. Wild killer Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts are widespread in most of the wine regions of the world that have been studied (6,7,11,13,16,17,30,31,33,36,38,39,42,43,48). As deduced from the few in-depth studies done to date, the frequency of killer yeasts in a given wine production area or single spontaneous must fermentation seems to be very variable, and the proportion of spontaneous fermentations that contain killer yeasts can be as high as 88%, although this proportion can be much influenced by the fermentation stage, vintage period, or production area (13, 39).The influence of killer toxins on wine fermentation has been studied for more than 20 years (36,47), and the relative importance of this influence in commercial winemaking is still a topic of discussion (13). The presence of killer yeasts may become particularly important in wine fermentations conducted by inoculation with selected killer-sensitive strains of Saccharomyces, which may be suppressed by wild killer yeasts during the fermentation (15,25,40). Also, in spontaneous must fermentation, replacement of a given dominant population by low-frequency killer strains may result in nutrient limitation, leading to fermentation problems. Any of these chance occurrences may decrease wine quality or even cause stuck or sluggish wine fermentation (22,25). On the other hand, must inoculation with killer yeast may suppress undesirable wild yeast strains, thus preserving wine quality.The magn...