No abstract

Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, was designed to generate 5-fluorouracil preferentially at the tumour site. This randomised, phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or paclitaxel in patients with anthracyclinepretreated metastatic breast cancer. Outpatients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer whose disease was unresponsive or resistant to anthracycline therapy were randomised to 3-week cycles of intermittent oral capecitabine (1255 mg m 72 twice daily, days 1 -14, (22 patients)) or a reference arm of i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg m 72 , (20 patients)). Two additional patients were initially randomised to continuous capecitabine 666 mg m 72 twice daily, but this arm was closed following selection of the intermittent schedule for further development. Overall response rate was 36% (95% CI 17 -59%) with capecitabine (including three complete responses) and 26% (95% CI 9 -51%) with paclitaxel (no complete responses). Median time to disease progression was similar in the two treatment groups (3.0 months with capecitabine, 3.1 months with paclitaxel), as was overall survival (7.6 and 9.4 months, respectively). Paclitaxel was associated with more alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, myalgia and neutropenia, whereas typical capecitabine-related adverse events were diarrhoea, vomiting and hand -foot syndrome. Twenty-three per cent of capecitabine-treated patients and 16% of paclitaxel-treated patients achieved a 510% improvement in Karnofsky Performance Status. Oral capecitabine is active in anthracycline-pretreated advanced/ metastatic breast cancer and has a favourable safety profile. Furthermore, capecitabine provides a convenient, patientorientated therapy.

No abstract

Recently, immune edition has been recognized as a new hallmark of cancer. In this respect, some clinical trials in breast cancer have reported imppressive outcomes related to laboratory immune findings, especially in the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting. Infiltration by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and their subtypes, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSC) seem bona fide prognostic and even predictive biomarkers, that will eventually be incorporated into diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of breast cancer. In addition, the complex interaction of costimulatory and coinhibitory molecules on the immune synapse and the different signals that they may exert represent another exciting field to explore. In this review we try to summarize and elucidate these new concepts and knowledge from a translational perspective focusing on breast cancer, paying special attention to those aspects that might have more significance in clinical practice and could be useful to design successful therapeutic strategies in the future.

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease characterised by a dysregulation of multiple pathways related to cell differentiation, cell cycle control, apoptosis, angiogenesis and development of metastasis. Acting against these pathways provides therapeutic targets for new targeted biologic therapies, which, in the future, might constitute a key for fighting cancer. The development of molecular technology in recent years has allowed a further comprehension of these mutations and dysregulated pathways leading to oncogenesis. New targeted biologic therapies will block essential functions of cancer cells and tumour stroma. A growing number of therapy options, alone or in combination with background treatments (chemotherapy, hormone therapy, radiotherapy), will allow oncologists a better adaptation of treatment to patients and disease characteristics. Examples of approved targeted agents in breast cancer include agents targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), such as trastuzumab, lapatinib and the anti-VEGF bevacizumab. In addition, there are other therapy classes under evaluation, including novel antiEGFR or antiHER2 therapies; agents fighting other tyrosine kinases, including the Src and the insulinlike growth factor receptor; agents interfering critically relevant pathways, such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors; and agents promoting apoptosis, such as PARP inhibitors (for particular breast cancer subtypes, such as basal-like, or breast cancer with BRCA mutations) and others. The better selectivity against malignant cells of these therapies, when compared to conventional chemotherapy, gives, a priori, at least two advantages to biologic treatments: fewer side effects and a more individualised treatment of cancer depending on the tumour's molecular characteristics. The ability to identify patients' subgroups and response predicting factors will be crucial in obtaining the greatest benefit with minimal toxicity levels. Unsolved questions remain, such as appropriate patient selection based on the expression of the therapeutic target in the tumour, the study of the efficacy of the drug in not so extensively pretreated populations and with a greater chance of response, the use of new pharmacodynamic models to help to define new response predicting factors for a specific new biologic therapy, the combined and rational use of different biologic therapies having different molecular targets and fighting the same target through a complementary mechanism of action that might improve clinical efficacy.