Background: Insertional Achilles tendinosis is a clinical entity that commonly occurs with other posterior heel disorders such as retrocalcaneal bursitis, Haglund deformity, intratendinous ossification and pretendinous bursitis. Complete detachment and reconstruction of the Achilles tendon was evaluated as a method of treatment for this condition. Methods: Seventyfive patients (81 heels) were treated over a 5-year period for chronic insertional Achilles tendinosis. These were divided in two groups: a nondetached group (26 patients, 31 heels, average age 55 years) included all patients with debridement of the Achilles tendon with no or partial detachment of the tendon, and a detached group (49 patients, 50 heels, average age 56.1 years) that included all patients with complete detachment, debridement, and reattachment with suture anchors of the Achilles tendon associated with proximal V-Y lengthening of the proximal aponeurosis. Sixty-one patients (65 heels) were contacted for an interview questionnaire, 22 patients from the nondetached group (26 heels) and 39 patients from the detached group (39 heels). The average followup for the nondetached group was 47 months and for the detached group 33 months. Items evaluated included pain, activity limitation, gait change, walking distance, return to sport or work, and level of satisfaction. Results: No statistically significant differences were noted in relation to any of the items evaluated. In the nondetached group, the satisfaction rate was 92%, and 8% were dissatisfied. In the detached group, 74% were completely satisfied and 18% were satisfied with reservations. Eight percent were dissatisfied. Complications included minor wound dehiscence (one in the nondetached, five in the detached group), wound infection (one in the nondetached group, two in the detached group)

The excellent functional and satisfaction results, ease of the procedure, and avoidance of sural nerve damage make the mini-open technique a very attractive alternative for acute, spontaneous Achilles tendon ruptures.

Outcome measures evaluate various aspects of patient health, and when appropriately utilized can provide valuable information in both clinical practice and research settings. The orthopedic community has placed increasing emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures, recognizing their value for understanding patients' perspectives of treatment outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes are information directly reported by patients regarding their perceptions of health, quality of life, or functional status without interpretation by healthcare providers. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) supports the use of validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to assess patient general health, functional status, and outcomes of treatment. It is not possible to recommend a single instrument to collect quality orthopedic data as the selection is dependent on the population being examined and the question being asked. We support the use of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test (PF CAT) or Lower Extremity Computerized Adaptive Test (LE CAT), which can be assessed with other domains such as Pain Interference. In addition, a disease-specific measure can be used when available.

No abstract