BACKGROUND: Bacteremia is now an uncommon presentation to the children's emergency department (ED) but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Its evolving etiology may affect the ability of clinicians to initiate timely, appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Low glycaemic index (GI) foods consumed at breakfast can enhance memory in comparison to high-GI foods; however, the impact of evening meal GI manipulations on cognition the following morning remains unexplored. Fourteen healthy males consumed a high-GI evening meal or a low-GI evening meal in a counterbalanced order on two separate evenings. Memory and attention were assessed before and after a high-GI breakfast the following morning. The high-GI evening meal elicited significantly higher evening glycaemic responses than the low-GI evening meal. Verbal recall was better the morning following the high-GI evening meal compared to after the low-GI evening meal. In summary, the GI of the evening meal was associated with memory performance the next day, suggesting a second meal cognitive effect. The present findings imply that an overnight fast may not be sufficient to control for previous nutritional consumption.

AimTo increase the documented use of the Lifestart trolley to allow premature infants’ (<32 weeks’ gestation) resuscitation and stabilisation with an intact umbilical cord at delivery.DesignA 13-month quality improvement programme from April 2018 to April 2019 was undertaken using Plan, Do, Study and Act (PDSA) cycles. Data were reviewed from 113 consecutive preterm (<32 weeks) deliveries to identify whether Lifestart was used and whether 2 min deferred cord clamping (DCC) occurred in eligible infants as per hospital policy. Episodes of non-compliance were analysed, causes established and interventions implemented to reduce similar future non-compliance. Data collected were presented graphically and included in alternate monthly newsletters to staff, which also included lessons learnt from the reviews of non-compliance.ResultsDocumented use of the Lifestart rose from 10% at the start of the project to 79% in the final month. Not all babies are eligible for DCC. Within this project, 40 (35%) of preterm infants were not eligible to receive DCC. Of those that were eligible, the rate of DCC increased from 17% in the first 3 months to 92% in the last 3 months of the project (p<0.0001).Implications and relevanceBy undertaking regular PDSA cycles and improving education surrounding importance of DCC, we have noted a significant improvement in the use of Lifestart, which in turn facilitates DCC.The learning from this project has been used to create an instructional video to help maintain the improved compliance rates.

Acta Paediatrica. 2020;109:930-934. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/apa | INTRODUC TI ONPulmonary hypertension (PH) complicating neonatal hypoxaemic respiratory failure occurs in approximately 0.4-6.8 cases per 1000 live births and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. 1,2 The terms "pulmonary hypertension" and "persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn" (PPHN) are often used interchangeably, and this probably reflects the absence of clear case definitions.Unlike paediatric and adult pulmonary hypertension, there is no internationally accepted definition of PH in neonatal medicine. 3,4 The lack of a standardised definition precludes meaningful interpretation of clinical trials in this field, because it is difficult to compare trials with different entry criteria, perform subgroup analyses stratified by disease severity and adjust for confounding variables.Abbreviations: a/A ratio, alveolar to arterial oxygen tension ratio; BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; iNO, inhaled nitric oxide; OI, oxygenation index; PAP, pulmonary arterial pressure; PH, pulmonary hypertension; PPHN, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn; RCT, randomized controlled trial. Abstract Aim: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) frequently complicates neonatal hypoxaemic respiratory failure, but is inconsistently defined. We aimed to describe the variation among randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), in relation to the definition of PH and/or hypoxaemic respiratory failure used to select patients for trial inclusion. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for RCTs of iNO in neonates. Included studies were assessed for clinical and/or echocardiography criteria used to define PH/hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Results: Thirty-two trials were included in this review, of which 23 enrolled infants ≥34 weeks' gestation. Echocardiographic diagnosis was used in 21 studies, but there was considerable variation in the echocardiographic parameters used to diagnose PH. The most commonly used indices included markers of tricuspid regurgitation and extrapulmonary shunt. Conclusion: There is wide variation in the definition of PH used to select infants for inclusion into RCTs of iNO therapy in neonates. We recommend that an international consensus be reached on which parameters should be used and the thresholds defining severity of disease. K E Y W O R D S inhaled nitric oxide, neonatal, pulmonary hypertension, randomised controlled trial, systematic review This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. | 931 HOYLE Et aL.Despite an absence of a clear definition of PH in this population, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have frequently included neonates with hypoxaemic respiratory failure complicated by PH/ PPHN when evaluating the efficacy of pulmonary vasodilator therapies. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is a licensed treatment for newborn infants ≥34 weeks gestation with hypoxic respiratory failure...