The mature skeletons of hard corals, termed stony or scleractinian corals, are made of aragonite (CaCO 3 ). During their formation, particles attaching to the skeleton's growing surface are calcium carbonate, transiently amorphous. Here we show that amorphous particles are observed frequently and reproducibly just outside the skeleton, where a calicoblastic cell layer envelops and deposits the forming skeleton. The observation of particles in these locations, therefore, is consistent with nucleation and growth of particles in intracellular vesicles. The observed extraskeletal particles range in size between 0.2 and 1.0 μm and contain more of the amorphous precursor phases than the skeleton surface or bulk, where they gradually crystallize to aragonite. This observation was repeated in three diverse genera of corals, Acropora sp., Stylophora pistillatadifferently sensitive to ocean acidification (OA)and Turbinaria peltata, demonstrating that intracellular particles are a major source of material during the additive manufacturing of coral skeletons. Thus, particles are formed away from seawater, in a presumed intracellular calcifying fluid (ICF) in closed vesicles and not, as previously assumed, in the extracellular calcifying fluid (ECF), which, unlike ICF, is partly open to seawater. After particle attachment, the growing skeleton surface remains exposed to ECF, and, remarkably, its crystallization rate varies significantly across genera. The skeleton surface layers containing amorphous pixels vary in thickness across genera: ∼2.1 μm in Acropora, 1.1 μm in Stylophora, and 0.9 μm in Turbinaria. Thus, the slowcrystallizing Acropora skeleton surface remains amorphous and soluble longer, including overnight, when the pH in the ECF drops. Increased skeleton surface solubility is consistent with Acropora's vulnerability to OA, whereas the Stylophora skeleton surface layer crystallizes faster, consistent with Stylophora's resilience to OA. Turbinaria, whose response to OA has not yet been tested, is expected to be even more resilient than Stylophora, based on the present data.

The hardest and toughest tissues formed by living organisms are organic-mineral composites termed biominerals 1,2. When they are crystalline, their mesostructure includes the nano- and micro-scale crystallite size, shape, arrangement, and orientation. Mesostructures vary enormously across marine CaCO3 biominerals (aragonite, vaterite, calcite) because they result from divergent evolution: biominerals were formed long after organisms diverged from one another 3,4. Despite such diversity, CaCO3 marine biominerals share a convergent character: adjacent crystals are similarly oriented 5-32. The reason for such convergence is unclear. Here, we show with quantitative, precise measurements at the nanoscale that the slight misorientation is consistently between 1°-40° in diverse biominerals. Can this slight misorientation confer a desirable materials property and therefore an evolutionary advantage to the forming organisms? We test and confirm this hypothesis with nanoindentation in diverse biominerals, geologic aragonite, and in abiotic, slightly misoriented, synthetic spherulites. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of bicrystals reveal that aragonite, vaterite, calcite, exhibit toughness peaks when they are misoriented by 10°, 20°, 30°, respectively, demonstrating that slight misorientation alone increases crack deflection and therefore fracture toughness. Slight misorientation, along with other previously known and co-existing toughening mechanisms, was selected repeatedly and convergently, during the course of evolution, to postpone fracture and thus provide organisms with competitive advantage. We anticipate slight misorientation-toughening to be a starting point for more sophisticated materials synthesis and additive manufacturing in many fields. Compared to previously known toughening mechanisms, in fact, the advantages of slight misorientation are that it can and does occur in synthetic materials, it requires one material only and no specific top-down architecture, it is easily achieved by self-assembly of organic molecules (e.g. aspirin, chocolate), polymers, metals, and ceramics 29 well beyond biominerals.

While cancer is mostly viewed as a genetic disease and characterized by genetic markers and expression of mutant proteins, there is considerable evidence that there is more to cancer than somatic mutations. For example, the first signature looked for by a pathologist is a grossly aberrant cell nucleus. Chromatin compaction and structure play a major role in the overall nuclear structure. We compared chromatin compaction, structure and gene expression for two esophageal cell lines, EPC2 (non-cancerous) and CP-D (cancerous) by using a combination of salt fractionation, DNA quantification by spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and sequencing.Salt fractionation is believed to be an efficient method for quantitative extraction of intact chromatin fragments from cell nuclei. We found that this method is not quantitative unless the supernatant fraction is included. For EPC2 and CP-D cells, about half of the genomic content is solved in the supernatant fraction. Further, we found significant differences for DNA amounts, and chromatin morphology for the cancerous and non-cancerous cell lines, as well as variations in the nucleosome partitioning. We anticipate that our results will help to get insights into the mechanisms of cell phenotype changes from normal to cancerous.