Background Digital health solutions have been shown to enhance outcomes for individuals with chronic medical illnesses, but few have been validated for surgical patients. The digital health platform ManageMySurgery (MMS) has been validated for spine surgery as a feasible method for patients along their surgical journey through in-app education and completion of patient-reported outcomes surveys. Objective The aim of this study is to determine the rates of 90-day emergency room (ER) visits, readmissions, and complications in patients undergoing spine surgery using MMS compared to patients using traditional perioperative care alone. Methods Patients undergoing spine surgery at a US-based academic hospital were invited to use MMS perioperatively between December 2017 and September 2021. All patients received standard perioperative care and were classified as MMS users if they logged into the app. Demographic information and 90-day outcomes were acquired via electronic health record review. The odds ratios of having 90-day ER visits, readmissions, mild complications, and severe complications between the MMS and non-MMS groups were estimated using logistic regression models. Results A total of 1015 patients were invited, with 679 using MMS. MMS users and nonusers had similar demographics: the average ages were 57.9 (SD 12.5) years and 61.5 (SD 12.7) years, 54.1% (367/679) and 47.3% (159/336) were male, and 90.1% (612/679) and 88.7% (298/336) had commercial or Medicare insurance, respectively. Cervical fusions (559/1015, 55.07%) and single-approach lumbar fusions (231/1015, 22.76%) were the most common procedures for all patients. MMS users had a lower 90-day readmission rate (55/679, 8.1%) than did nonusers (30/336, 8.9%). Mild complications (MMS: 56/679, 8.3%; non-MMS: 32/336, 9.5%) and severe complications (MMS: 66/679, 9.7%; non-MMS: 43/336, 12.8%) were also lower in MMS users. MMS users had a lower 90-day ER visit rate (MMS: 62/679, 9.1%; non-MMS: 45/336, 13.4%). After adjustments were made for age and sex, the odds of having 90-day ER visits for MMS users were 32% lower than those for nonusers, but this difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.45-1.02; P=.06). Conclusions This is one of the first studies to show differences in acute outcomes for people undergoing spine surgery who use a digital health app. This study found a correlation between MMS use and fewer postsurgical ER visits in a large group of spine surgery patients. A planned randomized controlled trial will provide additional evidence of whether this digital health tool can be used as an intervention to improve patient outcomes.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study Objective: This study identifies potential disparities in telemedicine utilization in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath in patients receiving spine surgery. Summary of Background Data: COVID-19 led to the rapid uptake of telemedicine in the spine surgery patient population. While previous studies in other medical subspecialties have identified sociodemographic disparities in telemedicine uptake, this is the first study to identify disparities in patients undergoing spine surgery. Materials and Methods: This study included patients who underwent spine surgery between June 12, 2018 and July 19, 2021. Patients were required to have at least one scheduled patient visit, either virtual (video or telephone visit) or in-person. Binary socioeconomic variables used for modeling included: urbanicity, age at the time of the procedure, sex, race, ethnicity, language, primary insurer, and patient portal utilization. Analyses were conducted for the entire cohort and separately for cohorts of patients who had visits scheduled within specific timeframes: Pre–COVID-19 surge, initial COVID-19 surge, and post–COVID-19 surge. Results: After adjusting for all variables in our multivariable analysis, patients who utilized the patient portal had higher odds of completing a video visit compared with those who did not (OR: 5.21; 95% CI: 1.28, 21.23). Hispanic patients (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.98) or those living in rural areas (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.93) had lower odds of completing a telephone visit. Patients with no insurance or on public insurance had higher odds of completing a virtual visit of either type (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.10, 3.23). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the disparity in telemedicine utilization across different populations within the surgical spine patient population. Surgeons may use this information to guide interventions aimed at reducing existing disparities and work with certain patient populations to find a solution.