What is the central question of this study? We developed and validated a 'stimulus index' (SI; ratio of end-tidal partial pressures of CO and O ) method to quantify cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in anterior and posterior cerebral circulations during breath holding. We aimed to determine whether the magnitude of CVR is correlated with breath-hold duration. What is the main finding and its importance? Using the SI method and transcranial Doppler ultrasound, we found that the magnitude of CVR of the anterior and posterior cerebral circulations is not positively correlated with physiological or psychological break-point during end-inspiratory breath holding. Our study expands the ability to quantify CVR during breath holding and elucidates factors that affect break-point. The central respiratory chemoreflex contributes to blood gas homeostasis, particularly in response to accumulation of brainstem CO . Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) affects chemoreceptor stimulation inversely through CO washout from brainstem tissue. Voluntary breath holding imposes alterations in blood gases, eliciting respiratory chemoreflexes, potentially contributing to breath-hold duration (i.e. break-point). However, the effects of cerebrovascular reactivity on break-point have yet to be determined. We tested the hypothesis that the magnitude of CVR contributes directly to breath-hold duration in 23 healthy human participants. We developed and validated a cerebrovascular stimulus index methodology [SI; ratio of end-tidal partial pressures of CO and O (P ET ,CO2/P ET ,O2)] to quantify CVR by correlating measured and interpolated values of P ET ,CO2 (r = 0.95, P < 0.0001), P ET ,O2 (r = 0.98, P < 0.0001) and SI (r = 0.94, P < 0.0001) during rebreathing. Using transcranial Doppler ultrasound, we then quantified the CVR of the middle (MCAv) and posterior (PCAv) cerebral arteries by plotting cerebral blood velocity against interpolated SI during a maximal end-inspiratory breath hold. The MCAv CVR magnitude was larger than PCAv (P = 0.001; +70%) during breath holding. We then correlated MCAv and PCAv CVR with the physiological (involuntary diaphragmatic contractions) and psychological (end-point) break-point, within individuals. There were significant inverse but modest relationships between both MCAv and PCAv CVR and both physiological and psychological break-points (r < -0.53, P < 0.03). However, these relationships were absent when MCAv and PCAv cerebrovascular conductance reactivity was correlated with both physiological and psychological break-points (r > -0.42; P > 0.06). Although central chemoreceptor activation is likely to be contributing to break-point, our data suggest that CVR-mediated CO washout from central chemoreceptors plays no role in determining break-point, probably because of a reduced arterial-to-tissue CO gradient during breath holding.
High-altitude (>2500m) exposure results in increased muscle sympathetic nervous activity (MSNA) in acclimatizing lowlanders. However, little is known about how altitude affects MSNA in indigenous high-altitude populations. Additionally, the relationship between MSNA and blood pressure regulation (i.e., neurovascular transduction) at high-altitude is unclear. We sought to determine 1) how high-altitude effects neuro-cardiovascular transduction and 2) whether differences exist in neuro-cardiovascular transduction between low and high-altitude populations. Measurements of MSNA (microneurography), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP; finger photoplethysmography), and heart rate (electrocardiogram) were collected in: I) lowlanders (n=14) at low (344m) and high-altitude (5050m), II) Sherpa highlanders (n=8; 5050m), and III) Andean (with and without excessive erythrocytosis) highlanders (n=15; 4300m). Cardiovascular responses to MSNA burst sequences (i.e. singlet, couplet, triplet, and quadruplets) were quantified using custom software (coded in MATLAB, v2015b). Slopes were generated for each individual based on peak responses and normalized total MSNA. High altitude reduced neuro-cardiovascular transduction in lowlanders (MAP slope: high-altitude, 0.0075±0.0060 vs low-altitude, 0.0134±0.080; p=0.03). Transduction was elevated in Sherpa (MAP slope, 0.012±0.007) compared to Andeans (0.003±0.002; p=0.001). MAP transduction was not statistically different between acclimatizing lowlanders and Sherpa (MAP slope, p=0.08) or Andeans (MAP slope, p=0.07). When accounting for resting MSNA (ANCOVA), transduction was inversely related to basal MSNA (bursts/min) independent of population (RRI, r= 0.578 p<0.001; MAP, r= -0.627 p<0.0001). Our results demonstrate transduction is blunted in individuals with higher basal MSNA, suggesting blunted neuro-cardiovascular transduction is a physiological adaptation to elevated MSNA rather than an effect or adaptation specific to chronic hypoxic exposure.
High-altitude natives employ numerous physiological strategies to survive and reproduce. However, the concomitant influence of altitude and physical activity during pregnancy has not been studied above 3,700 m. We report a case of physical activity, sleep behavior, and physiological measurements on a 28-yr-old third-trimester pregnant native highlander (Sherpa) during ascent from 3,440 m to Everest Base Camp (~5,300 m) over 8 days in the Nepal Himalaya and again ~10 mo postpartum during a similar ascent profile. The participant engaged in 250-300 min of moderate to vigorous physical activity per day during ascent to altitude while pregnant, with similar volumes of moderate to vigorous physical activity while postpartum. There were no apparent maternal, fetal, or neonatal complications related to the superimposition of the large volumes of physical activity at altitude. This report demonstrates a rare description of physical activity and ascent to high altitude during pregnancy and points to novel questions regarding the superimposition of pregnancy, altitude, and physical activity in high-altitude natives.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.