No abstract

This is the first report to analyze the metastatic pattern of EOC on the appendix with respect to depth of invasion which could not reveal a significant difference.

Background:Renal biopsy is a cornerstone in the diagnosis and management of renal involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, non-lupus nephritis has been also observed in SLE patients with renal disease (1).Objectives:The aim of this study was to draw attention to the causes of non-lupus nephritis in SLE patients with kidney biopsy.Methods:This retrospective, descriptive study included 139 SLE patients who had at least one kidney biopsy between 2001 and 2020. All patients had fulfilled the SLICC or EULAR/ACR criteria for SLE. According to the pathology report results, 116 of the patients were diagnosed with lupus nephritis (LN), 18 patients had non-lupus nephritis, 2 biopsies were normal, and 3 biopsies were insufficient. Demographics, SLE disease duration, and renal biopsy diagnosis were derived from our hospital medical records.Results:Of the 23 patients (female:18/male:5), the mean age at the SLE diagnosis was 30.5 years and the median SLE disease duration was 8.5 (11.6) years. Pathologic report findings were compatible with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in 6 patients, membranous nephropathy with no cellular proliferation and inflammation in 4 patients, thrombotic microangiopathy in 3 patients, IgM nephropathy in 2 patients, tubulointerstitial nephritis in 2 patients, and proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits in one patient. There were no different for SLE manifestation in both gropus. LN vs other renal pathologies laboratory comparing as follow: ANA (+) ≥ 1:320 89 (76.7%) vs 14 (60.9%), APS antibodies 31 (33.7%) vs 8 (57.1), anti-Sm (+) 8 (11.8%) vs 1 (4.3%) were similar for LN and other renal pathologies, but anti-ds-DNA positivity 94 (84.7%) vs 10 (50%), median ds-DNA level 421 (591) vs 150 (340) and low level of C3 and C4 were more frequent in LN (p<0.001; p=0.005; p<0.001, respectively).In addition, the rate of active urinary sediment and renal SLEDAI score were significantly high in LN patients.Conclusion:Various renal lesions unrelated to lupus nephritis can be observed in SLE patients. Renal biopsy plays a critical role in identifying these lesions, which may have prognostic and therapeutic implications distinctive from those of lupus nephritis. Also, anti ds-DNA positivity/level, low C3 and C4, active urinary sediment and renal SLEDAI scores may give us some clues in terms of renal pathology for SLE patients. Moreover, almost half of the patients without LN in renal biopsy have anti ds-DNA positivity.References:[1]Howell DN. Renal biopsy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Not just lupus glomerulonephritis! Ultrastruct Pathol. 2017 Mar-Apr;41(2):135-146.Table 1.Demographic, clinical characteristics and results of patients with and without lupus nephritisVariables*Lupus nephritis(N=116)Other pathologies(N=23)PAge at the SLE diagnosis, years22.5±13.130.5±14.50.006Sex, female93 (80.2)18 (78.3)0.83SLE disease duration8 (8.7)8.5 (11.6)0.27Manifestation of SLE-Musculoscletal75 (66.4)14 (63.6)0.8-Mucocutaneous60 (52.6)9 (40.9)0.31-Hematologic47 (40.9)10 (43.5)0.49-Serosal26 (23.2)4 (17.4)0.54-Neurological6 (5.3)1 (4.3)0.85Laboratory values for kidney biopsy-Creatinine level (mg/dL)0.7 (0.5)0.9 (0.6)0.17-GFR (ml/min)110 (67)77 (65)0.06-24-hour urine protein≥ 1 gr/day72 (71.3)17 (77.3)0.63≥ 3 gr/day36 (35.6)11 (50)0.23-Active urinary sediment91 (83.5)6 (27.3)<0.001Renal SLEDAI at the biopsy12 (8)4 (4)<0.001End-stage renal disease13 (11.2)2 (8.7)0.72Renal transplantation5 (4.3)1 (4.3)0.99Exitus8 (7)1 (4.3)0.99*n (%), if otherwise specified. Med (IQR) for numerical data excluding age; mean ± SD for age.GFR: Glomerular filtration rate, LN: Lupus nephritis, SLEDAI: Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity indexDisclosure of Interests:None declared

Background:Although focusing on the proliferative form of lupus nephritis (LN), recent reports also highlight the importance of recognizing and treating non-proliferative forms of LN.Objectives:In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical features and outcomes between proliferative and non-proliferative LN and to investigate the predictor factors of end stage renal disease (ESRD).Methods:This retrospective study included 139 SLE patients who had at least one kidney biopsy between 2001 and 2020. 116 patients were diagnosed as LN. Biopsy findings had been classified according to the International Society of Nephrology and the Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification. Demographics, disease involvements, laboratory values, treatment regimens, and outcomes in LN course were compared according to the proliferative and non-proliferative LN. Complete renal response within first 24 months was defined as ACR response criteria. Factors predicting the ESRD were analysed by the logistic regression analysis.Results:A total of 116 lupus nephritis patients were categorised class 3 (n=17, 14.7%) or 4 (n=77, 66.4%) as proliferative LN and class 2 (n=9, 7.8%) or 5 (n=13, 11.2%) as non-proliferative LN. Of these patients, 80.2% was female. Mean age at the SLE diagnosis and SLE manifestations were similar for both group. ANA (+) ≥ 1:320, ds-DNA level, APS antibodies, anti-Sm (+) were similar for proliferative and non-proliferative LN, but ds DNA positivity and low level of C3 and C4 were more frequent in proliferative LN. LN duration was similar. Median renal SLEDAI scores were higher in proliferative LN group. Induction treatment regimens included pulse steroid 72.3%, CyC 51.8%, MMF 24.6%, Rtx 6.1%, CsA 4.4%, and plasma exchange 12.9%. ESRD, renal transplantation and exitus were major complications of LN. Predictors of ESRD were duration of lupus nephritis (OR 1.32 [1.09-1.61]; 95% CI), decrease in GFR at the biopsy time (OR 0.97 [0.95-0.99]; 95% CI), and being in complete renal response within 24 months (OR 21.07 [2.28-194.36]; 95% CI).Conclusion:Unfortunately, LN patients still have worse outcomes, such as high ESRD rate, regarding to current effective immunosuppressive treatment regimens. Although patients’ number were not enough for conclusion, interestingly, worse outcomes were not related with proliferative or non-proliferative LN. Complete remission within 24 months was most relevant good prognostic factor, and clinicians should be kept in mind to these windows of opportunity period.Table 1.Demographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of the patients with lupus nephritisVariables*All patients (n=116)Class 3 or 4 LN (n=94)Class 2 or 5 LN (n=22)pAge at the SLE diagnosis, years22.5±13.123±13.320.3±140.32Sex, female93 (80.2)74 (78.7)19 (86.4)0.42SLE disease duration8 (8.7)8 (9.7)8.3 (7.5)0.66Lupus nephritis at diagnosis time67 (58.8)54 (58.7)13 (59.1)0.97Manifestation of SLE-Musculoscletal75 (66.4)63 (68.5)12 (57.1)0.32-Mucocutaneous60 (52.6)50 (54.3)10 (45.5)0.45-Hematologic47 (40.9)38 (40.4)9 (42.9)0.83-Serosal26 (23.2)21 (23.1)5 (23.8)0.94-Neurological6 (5.3)5 (5.4)1 (4.8)0.91Laboratory values for kidney biopsy-Creatinine level (mg/dL)0.7 (0.5)0.8 (0.5)0.6 (0.2)0.01-GFR (ml/min)110 (67)92 (55)145 (59)0.03-≥ 60 ml/min79 (79.8)63 (77.8)16 (88.9)-30-59 ml/min8 (8.1)7 (8.6)1 (5.6)0.55-< 30 ml/min12 (12.1)11 (13.6)1 (5.6)-24-hour urine protein≥ 1 gr/day72 (71.3)62 (76.5)10 (52.6)0.04≥ 3 gr/day36 (35.6)32 (39)4 (21.1)0.14-Active urinary sediment91 (83.5)78 (89.7)13 (59.1)0.001Renal SLEDAI at the biopsy12 (8)12 (8)8 (8)0.001Lupus nephritis duration (years)5.5 (8)5.1 (8.3)6.4 (4.8)0.73Complete renal response within 24 months69 (71.1)55 (72.4)14 (66.7)0.61End-stage renal disease13 (11.2)11 (11.7)2 (9.1)0.72Renal transplantation5 (4.3)4 (4.3)1 (4.5)0.95Exitus8 (7)7 (7.5)1 (4.5)0.62*n (%), if otherwise specified. Med (IQR) for numerical data excluding age; mean ± SD for age.GFR: Glomerular filtration rate, LN: Lupus nephritis, SLEDAI: Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity indexDisclosure of Interests:None declared

Objective We aimed to compare clinical features, outcomes, treatments, and to define the predictive factors of complete renal response (CRR) in patients with proliferative and non-proliferative lupus nephritis (LN). Methods Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) followed between 2014 and 2020 at Hacettepe University Hospitals and who had a kidney biopsy were the subject of the study. One hundered and sixteen patients’ kidney biopsies reported as LN were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical characteristics and laboratory values at the time of kidney biopsy, histopathological forms of LN, and renal response (complete or partial) were recorded. We analyzed the association between CRR rates during the 2-year follow-up after induction therapy and the predictive factors for CRR. Results Of 116 (93 females, 23 males) patients, 95 (81.9%) were in the proliferative group (class III and IV) and 21 (18.1%) were in the non-proliferative group (class II and V). In the proliferative group, the percentage of the patients with elevated basal creatinine levels, median daily proteinuria, anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) positivity, low C3 and C4 levels, the presence of active urinary sediment, and median renal SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores at the time of kidney biopsy were significantly higher than the non-proliferative group. Renal response status during the 2-year follow-up after induction therapy was available for 99 patients. During this time, 70 (70.7%) patients had achieved CRR and time-to-CRR was similar between the proliferative and non-proliferative groups (p = 0.64, log-rank test). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that achievement of CRR was associated with female gender [HR: 2.15 (1.19–3.89 95% CI), p = 0.011], newly diagnosed SLE with renal biopsy [HR: 2.15 (1.26–3.67 95% CI), p = 0.005], hypertension [HR: 0.40 (0.27–0.94 95% CI), p = 0.032], eGFR increase [HR: 1.01 (1.00–1.01 95% CI), p = 0.046], and the presence of active urinary sediment [HR: 0.46 (0.22–0.96 95% CI), p = 0.039]. Conclusions Achieving CRR was similar in proliferative and non-proliferative LN patients, although certain laboratory parameters differed at the onset. Our results indicated the importance of kidney biopsy in the decision-making of treatment of SLE patients with renal involvement and that the defined factors associated with CRR achievement help to predict good renal response.