Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are new targets in cancer immunotherapy in recent years. The aim of this study is to evaluate the PD-1/PD-L1 expressions in sarcomas and to determine association between PD-1/PD-L1 expressions and clinical/pathological properties in some sarcoma subtypes. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 65 cases with sarcomas were analyzed. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to detect the PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions in tumor tissue and microenvironment, separately. PD-1 expression in tumor tissue and microenvironment was detected in 11 (17 %) and 8 (12 %) cases, respectively. PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue and microenvironment was detected in 19 (29 %) and 20 cases (30 %), respectively. None of the 5 Ewing sarcomas involving bone showed PD-1/PD-L1 expression, while 2 of 3 cases with Ewing sarcomas involving soft tissue showed PD-1 and PD-L1 expression. Among 5 cases with Kaposi sarcoma, four showed PD-1 and/or PD-L1 expression in tumor or microenvironment. PD-1/PD-L1 expressions were detected 3 of 6 cases with pleomorphic sarcoma, 2 of 4 cases with peripheral nerve sheath tumors and 1 of 4 cases with synovial sarcoma. Interestingly, strongest PD-1/PD-L1 expressions in our study group were detected in 2 sarcoma cases with the history of giant cell tumor. PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions are up to 30 % of the cases with sarcomas. It may be rational to target programmed death pathway in Kaposi sarcoma, pleomorphic sarcoma and peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Strong expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in cases with previous giant cell bone tumor has been found to be interesting and must be studied in giant cell tumor samples.
Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are new targets in cancer immunotherapy. PD-1 protein is an immune checkpoint expressed in many tumors. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is present in malignant Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells in approximately 40-50 % of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and prognostic importance of PD-1 and/or PD-L1 in HL and also to determine the association between EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) and PD-1/PD-L1. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 87 cases with HL were analyzed in this study. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to detect the PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions. Chromogenic in situ hybridization for EBER was performed using fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotide probes. PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions were found in 20 % of the cases. The EBER positivity was found in 40 cases (45 %). It has been found that co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was associated with shorter survival although PD-1 or PD-L1 expressions were not found to be related with survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in cases without PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions were 135 and 107 months, respectively. OS and DFS in cases with co-expression for PD-1 and PD-L1 were 24 and 20 months, respectively, and these differences were found to be statistically significant for both OS and DFS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was found to be an independent risk factor for prognosis (OR 6.9, 95 % CI 1.9-24.3). Targeting PD-1 and/or PD-L1 is meaningful due to the 20 % expression of each in HL, and we did not find an important association between PD-1 and PD-L1 and EBER expression in HL. Very poor outcome in cases with co-expression of PD-1/PD-L1 suggests new avenues to detect the new prognostic markers and also therapeutic approaches in HL.
Objectives: Although Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is one of the most curable cancers in adult patients, new targets have to be defined in cases resistant to traditional chemotherapy. The preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer testis antigen and its expression is very scarce or absent in normal tissues. For this reason PRAME is a promising candidate for tumor immunotherapy. The aim of this study is to understand the correlation of PRAME expression with prognostic factors in HL, to determine the utility of PRAME as a targeted molecule for immunotherapy and to compare real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the detection of PRAME. Methods: In 82 patients, PRAME was studied using real-time PCR and IHC. Data analyses were performed using statistical methods such as t test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. Results: PRAME was detected in 15 (18.3%) patients using IHC and in 8 (9.8%) patients using real-time PCR. A correlation was found between PRAME positivity and higher International Prognostic Score (p = 0.039). PRAME positivity detected using real-time PCR was found to be correlated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.0005). Discussion: The demonstration of PRAME especially in histiocytes and Reed-Sternberg cells may provide guidance for immunotherapy. Although PRAME positivity increases the risk for death (3.56), independent risk factors that affected DFS and OS occurred in advanced age and high-risk groups. Conclusion: Although real-time PCR is sensitive in the detection of PRAME, IHC can be another useful method. Despite the need for studies conducted on larger patient samples, PRAME expression is considered as a poor prognostic parameter in HL.
A 42-year-old female patient with no previous known diseases who had complaints of postprandial epigastric pain and weight loss and who could not be diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy, although gastric cancer was suspected radiologically and endoscopically, was diagnosed with primary gastric tuberculosis by laparotomy and frozen section. Following anti-tuberculosis treatment, a complete clinical, radiological, and endoscopic response was achieved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.