High-performance non-aqueous drilling fluids (NADFs) are required to meet the challenging technical requirements of many offshore wells. Significant advances have led to the development of advanced NADFs, such as paraffins, olefins and esters, that are less toxic and more biodegradable than early generation diesel and mineral oil base fluids. Advanced NADFs provide the necessary drilling performance while ensuring environmentally-sound operations. Three options exist to manage waste from NADF-coated drill cuttings: marine discharge, downhole injection, and hauling to shore for land disposal. All options have advantages and disadvantages with regard to total life cycle environmental impact, safety, cost, and operational performance. Marine discharge of cuttings associated with advanced NADFs, however, is the option with the highest safety and operational flexibility. Further, the improved environmental performance of advanced NADFs broadens the acceptability of marine discharge. Field monitoring studies at multiple offshore drilling sites reveal a relatively consistent picture of the fate and effects of discharging drill cuttings associated with NADFs. The degree of impact is a function of local environmental conditions (water depth, currents, temperature), the amount of material discharged, and the type of drilling fluid used. More significant temporal and spatial effects were observed at sites that used early generation drilling fluids. Wells drilled with advanced NADFs resulted in smaller zones of seafloor impact and more rapid recovery of the benthic communities. This paper, based on the work performed by a task force of the International association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP)1, summarizes our knowledge base of the environmental-effects related to the discharge of NADF-coated drill cuttings. In addition, it describes tools and techniques for assessing environmental effects including laboratory methods to determine drilling fluid toxicity, biodegradability, and bioaccumulation potential and numerical models to predict the seafloor distribution of cuttings. The paper is intended to aid regulatory development and project environmental assessments by providing information to help balance environmental, operational, and cost considerations when choosing waste-management options for NADF drilling. Introduction Exploration and development drilling activities have expanded globally into such regions as the Caspian Sea, the UK Atlantic margin, offshore Brazil and West Africa, and the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico as technology has improved the economics of finding and extracting oil and gas. New drilling concepts, including extended reach, horizontal and multi-lateral wells, enable development to proceed with fewer platforms allowing these resources to be developed more economically. These techniques also have an environmental benefit of reducing the zone of seafloor disturbance. New drilling concepts are technically challenging and require high-performance drilling fluids with capabilities exceeding those available from water based fluids (WBFs). As a result, non-aqueous drilling fluids (NADFs), for which the continuous phase is primarily a non-water soluble base fluid i.e. non-aqueous base fluid (NABF), have been used extensively by the petroleum industry. Access to a full range of drilling fluid technology is necessary to achieve drilling performance objectives and to support cost-effective development, especially in deep water or where horizontal or extended reach drilling is employed.
OSPAR, the regulatory body for the prevention of the pollution of the North East Atlantic (which includes the producing area of the North Sea has decided to move from a prescriptive approach on the quantity of oil in produced water discharged to the sea to a risk based approach to identify where to put impetus and money to reduce the environmental footprint of these discharges, if any. The proposal combines a Whole Effluent Assessment (WEA), and a Predicted Environmental Concentration / Predicted No Effect Concentration (PEC/PNEC) approach on all and every substances identified in the produced water. As such it is a preservative measure, which has at first glance the advantage of being clear and consistent. But it has also weaknesses and pitfalls. Not only because the use of safety factors in the calculation of PNEC of substances in produced water is very conservative and may lead to erroneous conclusions and unnecessary changes in the process of some installations, but also because the overall benefit for the environment is not demonstrated. OSPAR has already implemented strict measures on produced water, and on the chemicals used and discharged offshore. The effect of this latest measure taken on chemicals "which are candidate for substitution" (i.e. the hazardous ones), which will be fully implemented by 2017, will undoubtedly dramatically reduce the discharge of hazardous chemicals used offshore, and the need for another measure, superimposed to the ones already taken by OSPAR, is questionable.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractIn 1994, the
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.