R e s e a R c h a R t i c l e3 4 9 2 jci.org Volume 125 Number 9 September 2015Other factors are likely involved, since over 80 genes were differentially expressed (at least 2-fold) in the TIE2-L914F endothelial cells compared with WT (30). We hypothesized that mutant TIE2 in endothelial cells is sufficient to cause VM. Here, we show that HUVECs engineered to Previous studies on mutant TIE2 showed that expression of TIE2-L914F or TIE2-R849W in HUVECs increased activation of AKT and of . Elevated AKT signaling in these cells has been linked to increased survival (29, 30) and to reduced production of PDGF-B (30), a major player in mural cell recruitment.

BackgroundExtensive and complex vascular malformations often cause chronic pain and severe functional restraint. Conventional treatments, such as surgery and/or sclerotherapy, are rarely curative, underscoring the great need for new therapeutic modalities. Recent preclinical and clinical data demonstrated that sirolimus could offset the progression of vascular malformations and significantly improve quality of life of patients through inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment in patients with extensive or complex slow-flow vascular malformations.MethodsSirolimus was administered orally on a continuous dosing schedule with pharmacokinetic-guided target serum concentration level of 10 to 15 ng/ml. Patients were seen every month for the first three months and subsequently every three months. The primary endpoints were safety and efficacy, based on clinical, biological and radiological evaluations, as well as a quality of life questionnaire.ResultsNineteen patients, from 3 to 64 years old, with lymphatic (LM), venous (VM) or complex slow-flow malformations, refractory to standard care, were enrolled and received sirolimus continuously. After 12 months of follow-up, 16 patients were available for assessment of efficacy and safety: all had a significant and rapid improvement of their symptoms and quality of life. In two patients, sirolimus treatment permitted sclerotherapy and surgery, initially evaluated unfeasible. Sirolimus was well tolerated, with mucositis as the most common (10% of patients) grade 3 adverse event.ConclusionsSirolimus was efficient in extensive LM, VM and/or complex malformations that were refractory to conventional treatments and was well tolerated.

Vascular and lymphatic malformations represent a challenge for clinicians. The identification of inherited and somatic mutations in important signaling pathways, including the PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase)/AKT (protein kinase B)/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), RAS (rat sarcoma)/RAF (rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma)/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase)/ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinases), HGF (hepatocyte growth factor)/c-Met (hepatocyte growth factor receptor), and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) A/VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor) 2 cascades has led to the evaluation of tailored strategies with preexisting cancer drugs that interfere with these signaling pathways. The era of theranostics has started for the treatment of vascular anomalies. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu ; Unique identifier: 2015-001703-32.

Everolimus showed clinical activity in advanced TCC. The profile of the plasma angiogenesis-related proteins suggested a role of the everolimus antiangiogenic properties in disease control. PTEN loss might be associated with everolimus resistance.