SUMMARYThe echolocation sounds of Japanese CF-FM bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) were measured while the bats pursued a moth (Goniocraspidum pryeri) in a flight chamber. Using a 31-channel microphone array system, we investigated how CF-FM bats adjust pulse direction and beam width according to prey position. During the search and approach phases, the horizontal and vertical beam widths were ±22±5 and ±13±5deg, respectively. When bats entered the terminal phase approximately 1m from a moth, distinctive evasive flight by G. pryeri was sometimes observed. Simultaneously, the bats broadened the beam widths of some emissions in both the horizontal (44% of emitted echolocation pulses) and vertical planes (71%). The expanded beam widths were ±36±7deg (horizontal) and ±30±9deg (vertical). When moths began evasive flight, the tracking accuracy decreased compared with that during the approach phase. However, in 97% of emissions during the terminal phase, the beam width was wider than the misalignment (the angular difference between the pulse and target directions). These findings indicate that bats actively adjust their beam width to retain the moving target within a spatial echolocation window during the final capture stages.
When seeing or listening to an object, we aim our attention toward it. While capturing prey, many animal species focus their visual or acoustic attention toward the prey. However, for multiple prey items, the direction and timing of attention for effective foraging remain unknown. In this study, we adopted both experimental and mathematical methodology with microphone-array measurements and mathematical modeling analysis to quantify the attention of echolocating bats that were repeatedly capturing airborne insects in the field. Here we show that bats select rational flight paths to consecutively capture multiple prey items. Microphone-array measurements showed that bats direct their sonar attention not only to the immediate prey but also to the next prey. In addition, we found that a bat's attention in terms of its flight also aims toward the next prey even when approaching the immediate prey. Numerical simulations revealed a possibility that bats shift their flight attention to control suitable flight paths for consecutive capture. When a bat only aims its flight attention toward its immediate prey, it rarely succeeds in capturing the next prey. These findings indicate that bats gain increased benefit by distributing their attention among multiple targets and planning the future flight path based on additional information of the next prey. These experimental and mathematical studies allowed us to observe the process of decision making by bats during their natural flight dynamics.bat sonar | aerial capture | microphone array | mathematical modeling | flight dynamics S electively focusing attention on a particular target allows us to effectively extract information (1-4). Animals spatially focus their attention toward prey for suitable foraging (5, 6). During prey pursuit, most animals direct their visual attention toward it [e.g., tiger beetle (7), dragonfly (8), and falcon (9)]. Specifically, for example, dragonflies maintain a prey item at a constant retinal position during approaching it so that they steer an interception flight path (interception strategy) (10). However, for multiple prey items, the direction and timing of attention for effective foraging remain unknown.Echolocating bats actively emit sonar signals to obtain surrounding information and adaptively change the characteristics of the emissions depending on the situation (11). Therefore, their attention in terms of the sonar (sonar attention) is characterized as the direction to which bats emit their sonar beams (12-14). When echolocating bats approach an airborne insect, the sonar attention directs toward the prey (12, 13). During natural foraging, the sonar attention of bats alternately shifts from their flying direction to the side (15). Additionally the wild bats are capable of capturing two prey items within the short interval of 1 s (16).We predicted that bats localize multiple prey items by distributing their attention between them and then select an efficient flight path to successively capture the multiple prey. To test this prediction, ...
Flight paths of echolocating Japanese house bats, Pipistrellus abramus, were tracked during insect hunting in a natural setting using a 32-microphone array. The array surrounded the foraging area, locating each bat, and determined the directional aim of the sonar beam. Successive interceptions, indicated by feeding "buzzes" and post-buzz pauses, occurred singly at intervals from over 20 s down to multiple interceptions at 2-3 s intervals. Bats flew on looping, curved paths. Turning radius tightened as rate of interceptions increased, keeping the bat in a smaller area of higher capture density. Broadcast beams shifted direction during search, often alternating between the direction of flight and another direction where, moments later, the next interception would occur. Broadcasts also shifted direction between the current target and the next target. Bats time-share biosonar attention between objects by alternating acoustic gaze. During search, most interpulse intervals (IPIs) were 70-120 ms, but bats interspersed long IPIs up to 200 ms when the rate of interception was low and flight paths followed broad curves. Mathematical modeling of search paths demonstrated that circular flight-paths with occasional long IPIs would be more effective for target search than either random, correlated random, or linear flights.
Using only a microphone array system, echolocation pulses and three-dimensional flight paths in the frequency-modulated bat, Pipistrellus abramus, during natural foraging, were simultaneously examined. During the search phase, the inter-pulse interval, pulse duration, and moving distance of the bat between successive emissions were relatively constant at around 89.5 ± 18.7 ms, 6.90 ± 1.31 ms, and 0.50 ± 0.20 m, respectively. The bats started to decrease these acoustical parameters within 2-3 m of the prey capture point. For every emission along a flight path, the distance between a bat and its prey capture point was calculated as both direct distance to capture (DDC), which corresponded to the target distance, and flight distance to capture (FDC) along the flight path. The DDC matched the FDC after the start of the approach phase, indicating that foraging bats followed a straight-ahead path to the target. In addition, the duration of the quasi-constant frequency component of emitted pulses was slightly extended just before the convergence of the DDC with the FDC. These findings suggest that the bats confirm the presence of target prey by extending the duration of the pulse and then select a straight-ahead approach by forecasting the movement of the prey.
Echolocation pulses emitted by wild Pipistrellus abramus were investigated while foraging for insects in the field. Similar to other European pipistrelles, the frequency structure during foraging varied. During the search phase, the bats emitted long shallow frequency-modulated pulses 9-11 ms in duration, whereas the maximum pulse duration of the bats approaching a large target wall in the laboratory was 3 ms. No significant difference was observed between decreases in the interpulse interval during these two approach flights. It is concluded that the bats use a long quasi-constant frequency pulse to find a weak echo from a small prey target.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.