Zirconia restorations have been used successfully for years in dentistry owing to their biocompatibility and good mechanical properties. Because of their lack of translucency, zirconia cores are generally veneered with porcelain, which makes restorations weaker due to failure of the adhesion between the two materials. In recent years, all-ceramic zirconia restorations have been introduced in the dental sector with the intent to solve this problem. Besides the elimination of chipping, the reduced occlusal space requirement seems to be a clear advantage of monolithic zirconia restorations. However, scientific evidence is needed to recommend this relatively new application for clinical use. This mini-review discusses the current scientific literature on monolithic zirconia restorations. The results of in vitro studies suggested that monolithic zirconia may be the best choice for posterior fixed partial dentures in the presence of high occlusal loads and minimal occlusal restoration space. The results should be supported with much more in vitro and particularly in vivo studies to obtain a final conclusion.

PURPOSE To investigate the effect of resin cement color on the post-cementation shade of thin laminate veneers milled from multilayered glass ceramic blocks for each layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thin slices (N = 180) with two thicknesses (A: 8 × 8×0.55 mm and B: 8×8×0.8 mm; n = 90/group) were obtained from multilayered glass ceramic blocks using a diamond saw. Resin die specimens were prepared (8 × 8 × 4 mm) (n = 180) and divided into two resin cement colors (D: -3. L: +3) and one control group (C: translucent). Each slice was luted to the composite specimens using a dual-curing resin cement under a constant load of 250 g and light-polymerized for 120 seconds. Specimens were placed on a white background and CIELab values for each layer of the blank slices (incisal [In], body [Bo], and cervical [Ce]) were recorded using a dental contact spectrophotometer. The values were calculated as ΔE, and the data were statistically analyzed (one-way ANOVA, Shapiro-Wilk). RESULTS Mean ΔE values for A and B were significant (p < 0.05) for In (A: 6.2 ± 1.1; B: 6.6 ± 1.2), Bo (A: 5.1 ± 2.6; B: 3.9 ± 1), and Ce (A: 5.3 ± 2.7; B: 3.8 ± 1.2). Mean ΔE values for In for D and L for A and B groups were significantly higher (6.3 ± 1.2; 6.6 ± 1.2) than Bo and Ce for D (4.4 ± 2.4; 4.6 ± 2.6) and L (4.6 ± 1.4; 4.5 ± 1.7) groups (p < 0.05), respectively. Mean differences between Bo and Ce for A and B groups were insignificant (p 0.05), while for In the differences were significant. Mean differences between Bo and Ce for A (5.1 ± 2.6; 5.3 ± 2.7) and for B (3.9 ± 1; 3.5 ± 1.2) groups were insignificant (p 0.05), while for In the differences were significant (6.2 ± 1.1 for A and 6.6 ± 1.2 for B). CONCLUSION The color changes for body and cervical regions of multilayered ceramic veneers were not affected by resin color or ceramic thickness, but the incisal area was affected. The translucency of each layer in ceramic veneer fabricated with multilayered blanks should be considered for clinical situations. for A and B groups were significantly higher (6,3±1,2;6,6±1,2) than Bo and Ce for D (4,4±2,4;4,6±2,6 ) and L (4,6±1,4;4,5±1,7) groups (p< 0.05), respectively. Mean differences between Bo and Ce for A (5,1±2,6; 5,3±2,7) and for B (3,9±1;3,5±1,2) groups were insignificant (P≥0.05) while for In the differences were significant (6,2±1,1 for A and 6,6±1,2 for B). Conclusion:The color changes for body and cervical regions of multilayered ceramic veneers were not affected from resin color or ceramic thickness while only incisal area was affected.Translucency of each layer in ceramic veneer fabricated with multilayered blanks should be considered for clinical situations.

No abstract

PURPOSE To determine wear amount of single molar crowns, made from four different restoratives, and opposing natural teeth through computerized fabrication techniques using 3D image alignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 24 single crowns (N = 24 patients, age range: 18 – 50) were made from lithium disilicate (IPS E-max CAD), lithium silicate and zirconia based (Vita Suprinity CAD), resin matrix ceramic material (Cerasmart, GC), and dual matrix (Vita Enamic CAD) blocks. After digital impressions (Cerec 3D Bluecam, DentsplySirona), the crowns were designed and manufactured (Cerec 3, DentsplySirona). A dual-curing resin cement was used for cementation (Variolink Esthetic DC, Ivoclar). Then, measurement and recording of crowns and the opposing enamel surfaces with the intraoral scanner were made as well as at the third and sixth month follow-ups. All measurements were superimposed with a software (David-Laserscanner, V3.10.4). Volume loss due to wear was calculated from baseline to follow-up periods with Siemens Unigraphics NX 10 software. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Repeated Measures for ANOVA (SPSS 21) at = .05 significance level. RESULTS After 6 months, insignificant differences of the glass matrix and resin matrix materials for restoration/enamel wear were observed ( P >.05). While there were no significant differences between the glass matrix groups ( P >.05), significant differences between the resin matrix group materials ( P <.05) were obtained. Although Cerasmart and Enamic were both resin matrix based, they exhibited different wear characteristics. CONCLUSION Glass matrix materials showed less wear both on their own and opposing enamel surfaces than resin matrix ceramic materials.

No abstract