Venous catheters are important therapeutic devices for the administration of fluid and chemotherapeutic agents; however, their use may be associated with serious complications, such as catheter rupture and embolism. Most data on port catheter embolization consist of isolated case reports; only a few studies have examined a large number of patients with port catheter embolism. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of clinical symptoms in patients with catheter dislocation and to determine the role of catheter fragment localization in combination with the presenting symptoms. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to Martin-Luther University Hospital Center from January 1994 to September 2005. In total, 41 patients with centrally dislocated catheter fragments were analyzed. Most catheter fragments were located in the pulmonary artery, superior vena cava, and right atrium. Of the patients in whom the catheter fragments were located in the right atrium, right ventricle, and the pulmonary artery, 7.3% presented cardiac symptoms. Catheter malfunction occurred in 39%. In 53.7%, catheter embolism was found incidentally. The embolized catheter fragments were retrieved by a goose-neck snare under fluoroscopy within 24 hours after the diagnosis without any complications. The mean length of these fragments was 11.6 cm. Catheter embolism may go undiagnosed for a prolonged period and be found incidentally. In these patients, predominantly local symptoms occur; however, severe systemic clinical signs may develop. The risk of serious complications in asymptomatic catheter embolism is unknown. Catheter fragments should be removed to prevent further complications.
The growing clinical and epidemiological significance of CDI compels a robust implementation of multimodal diagnostic, therapeutic, and hygienic standards. In the years to come, anti-toxin antibodies, toxoid vaccines, and focused bacterial therapy will be developed as new treatment strategies for CDI.
Local anesthesia led to temporary ipsilateral vocal cord paralysis in almost half of these patients. Because pre-existing paralysis is of a relevant frequency (up to 3%), a preoperative evaluation of vocal cord function before carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia is recommended to avoid intraoperative bilateral paralysis. In patients with preoperative contralateral vocal cord paralysis, surgery under general anesthesia should be considered.
Background
The aim of the study was to analyse the outcome of open surgical, endovascular, and hybrid interventions in the treatment of acute (AMI) and chronic (CMI) mesenteric ischemia.
Methods
Retrospective review of a cohort of mesenteric ischemia patients at a single tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. Primary end point was postoperative in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points were the number of bowel resections, duration of the procedure, length of postoperative intensive care treatment, length of hospital stay, revision surgery (number and type), and the nature and severity of postoperative complications according to Dindo-Clavien.
Results
A total of 64 patients, 20 with CMI and 44 with AMI, underwent open, hybrid or endovascular surgery. Bowel resection was performed in 45.5% of the patients with AMI (29.5% small intestine, 2.3% colon and 13.6% both). There was no in-hospital mortality in the CMI cohort as compared to 29.5% in the AMI cohort (p = 0.03), with no differences regarding endovascular and open surgery (29.6 vs 29.4%). Severe postoperative morbidity (Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3) was also significantly more frequent in the AMI group when compared to the CMI group (20 vs 77.3%, p < 0.001). ASA classification and intensive care stay were identified as factors associated with mortality in AMI patients.
Conclusions
Morbidity and in-hospital mortality are low in CMI patients, but substantial in AMI patients. Early diagnosis and open or endovascular treatment may be decisive for the outcome of these patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.