Fossils of the remarkable dromaeosaurid Microraptor gui and relatives clearly show well-developed flight feathers on the hind limbs as well as the front limbs. No modern vertebrate has hind limbs functioning as independent, fully developed wings; so, lacking a living example, little agreement exists on the functional morphology or likely flight configuration of the hindwing. Using a detailed reconstruction based on the actual skeleton of one individual, cast in the round, we developed light-weight, three-dimensional physical models and performed glide tests with anatomically reasonable hindwing configurations. Models were tested with hindwings abducted and extended laterally, as well as with a previously described biplane configuration. Although the hip joint requires the hindwing to have at least 20°of negative dihedral (anhedral), all configurations were quite stable gliders. Glide angles ranged from 3°to 21°with a mean estimated equilibrium angle of 13.7°, giving a lift to drag ratio of 4.1:1 and a lift coefficient of 0.64. The abducted hindwing model's equilibrium glide speed corresponds to a glide speed in the living animal of 10.6 m·s −1 . Although the biplane model glided almost as well as the other models, it was structurally deficient and required an unlikely weight distribution (very heavy head) for stable gliding. Our model with laterally abducted hindwings represents a biologically and aerodynamically reasonable configuration for this four-winged gliding animal. M. gui's feathered hindwings, although effective for gliding, would have seriously hampered terrestrial locomotion.E vidence now exists that should settle the long-running debate over a ground-up origin of avian flight vs. the evolution of avian flight from a trees-down glider. This evidence shows that the protoavian was arboreal (1) rather than a terrestrial cursor as many have suggested (2-4). The leading protagonist in this controversy is presently a dromaeosaur, Microraptor gui, with a fully formed hind wing that is closely similar to its completely avian forewing (5), having elongate, aerodynamically advanced "primary feathers" coming off the metatarsi (5). There seems little reason to doubt the aerodynamic function of the hindwing, but there has been controversy over exactly how it was arranged and used for flight. We decided to address this problem by creating and testing models that closely replicate the anatomical features preserved in the now numerous fossils of Microraptor and its close relatives (discussed in SI Text).Primitively, early archosaurs are sprawling, with the legs set laterally and elevated at around 75°(6), a preadapted posture for gliding. Modern birds normally have the thigh elevated and sprawled to the side in different degrees; for example, it is nearly perpendicular to the midline in loons and grebes (7). This variation shows that the degree of splaying needed to use the hindlegs in gliding is not unusual when compared with that in modern birds. The absence of an antitrochanter and a supraacetabular shelf (SAC) i...

Fluorescence using ultraviolet (UV) light has seen increased use as a tool in paleontology over the last decade. Laser-stimulated fluorescence (LSF) is a next generation technique that is emerging as a way to fluoresce paleontological specimens that remain dark under typical UV. A laser’s ability to concentrate very high flux rates both at the macroscopic and microscopic levels results in specimens fluorescing in ways a standard UV bulb cannot induce. Presented here are five paleontological case histories that illustrate the technique across a broad range of specimens and scales. Novel uses such as back-lighting opaque specimens to reveal detail and detection of specimens completely obscured by matrix are highlighted in these examples. The recent cost reductions in medium-power short wavelength lasers and use of standard photographic filters has now made this technique widely accessible to researchers. This technology has the potential to automate multiple aspects of paleontology, including preparation and sorting of microfossils. This represents a highly cost-effective way to address paleontology's preparatory bottleneck.

No abstract

The influence of fine particles on the flotation separation of minerals is becoming increasingly important as new, fine grained deposits are exploited. Fine particles float poorly and less selectively under normal flotation conditions, having detrimental effects on recovery of other minerals. The reasons of this interacting effect are complex, which may be entrainment, pH variation, dissolved ions from mineral surfaces, aggregation/dispersion and coating behavior of particles or even the competitive adsorption effect. In this study, the influence of fine magnesite and dolomite on the flotation of quartz was investigated. It was found that at pH=9.2~9.5 and with DDA dosage of 8.6×10 −4 , the recovery of coarse (-100+65µm) quartz was reduced dramatically from 96.66% to 37.15% when the content of quartz was 5% in the flotation with fine (-5µm) magnesite, and when the content of fine dolomite was increased from 2.5% to 20%, the recovery of coarse quartz was reduced from 91.20% to 75.08%. To examine the reasons, zeta potential, zero point of charge and contact angles of magnesite, dolomite and quartz were measured in the absence and presence of dodecylamine (DDA). The interaction energies between particles were then calculated. Results showed that the aggregation behavior of mineral particles was likely to be the reason. Interaction energy calculated based on Extended-DLVO (Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek) theory predicted that in DDA surfactant solution, the interaction forces between magnesite and quartz, dolomite and quartz were attractive, between dolomite and magnesite was repulsive. The experimental results are in excellent agreement with the theoretically predicted results. The aggregation caused by interacting behavior explains the depressing effect of fine hydrophilic particles on magnesite reverse flotation.

We suggest that some of the most avian dromaeosaurs, such as Sinornithosaurus, were venomous, and propose an ecological model for that taxon based on its unusual dentition and other cranial features including grooved teeth, a possible pocket for venom glands, and a groove leading from that pocket to the exposed bases of the teeth. These features are all analogous to the venomous morphology of lizards. Sinornithosaurus and related dromaeosaurs probably fed on the abundant birds of the Jehol forests during the Early Cretaceous in northeastern China.dromaeosaur | Jehol | grooved fangs | venomous delivery system O ne of the more bizarre innovations in organismic evolution is the ability to manufacture toxic substances. Venomous taxa occur in a variety of ecologic settings and include insects, lizards, snakes, and mammals (1-5). Clearly, venom has evolved numerous times in many different lineages employing various delivery apparatus. A combination of morphological and molecular research has recently shown that venomous taxa are far more widespread and primitive within tetrapod lineages than had previously been suspected (6).Sinornithosaurus is a dromaeosaurid closely related to the 4-winged glider Microraptor gui and therefore within the early avian radiation (7). It has unusually long maxillary teeth that are morphologically similar to those of "rear-fanged" snakes specialized to carry poison (Fig. 1). This type of fang discharges venom along a groove on the outer surface of the tooth that enters the wound of the bitten animal by capillary action (8, 9). Supporting this interpretation in Sinornithosaurus is an additional space on the lateral surface of the maxillary bone that we interpret on the basis of analogy with venomous squamates as having housed a venom gland. This previously undescribed fossa, herein termed the subfenestral fossa, could have housed an elongate, ascinar venom gland similar to that found in rear-fanged (i.e., opisthoglyphous) snakes (10, 11). We suggest that the venom traveled in ducts to the bases of the teeth and mixed with the saliva in a manner also similar to extant venomous squamates (6). The position of the venom collecting duct was probably along the oblique ventral surface of the maxilla, where there is a supradental groove (i.e., longitudinal depression running along the base of the tooth row). This groove bears small pits that seem to be related to tooth sites and may represent the location of small venom reservoirs. These depressions were illustrated and mentioned in the original description of Sinornithosaurus, but their purpose was not addressed. As in modern venomous taxa that employ grooved fangs, the ducts feed the venom to the base of the teeth. The mechanism for dispensing the venom may be similar to the system used by open-fanged snakes and lizards that discharge it under low pressure provided largely by force of the bite-a strategy for prey control rather than quick death (12). We believe Sinornithosaurus was a venomous predator that fed on birds by using its long fangs to...