Objective To assess whether the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 had negative indirect health effects, as people seem to have been reluctant to seek medical care. Methods All emergency medical services (EMS) transports for chest pain or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the Dutch region Hollands-Midden (population served > 800,000) were evaluated during the initial 6 weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown and during the same time period in 2019. The primary endpoint was the number of evaluated chest pain patients in both cohorts. In addition, the number of EMS evaluations of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and OHCA were assessed. Results During the COVID-19 lockdown period, the EMS evaluated 927 chest pain patients (49% male, age 62 ± 17 years) compared with 1041 patients (51% male, 63 ± 17 years) in the same period in 2019, which corresponded with a significant relative risk (RR) reduction of 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–0.96). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in the number of STEMI patients (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32–0.85), the incidence of OHCA remained unchanged (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.83–1.83). Conclusion During the first COVID-19 lockdown, there was a significant reduction in the number of patients with chest pain or STEMI evaluated by the EMS, while the incidence of OHCA remained similar. Although the reason for the decrease in chest pain and STEMI consultations is not entirely clear, more attention should be paid to the importance of contacting the EMS in case of suspected cardiac symptoms in possible future lockdowns.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic challenged health care systems in an unprecedented way. Due to the enormous amount of hospital ward and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, regular care came to a standstill, thereby overcrowding ICUs and endangering (regular and COVID-19-related) critical care. Acute care coordination centers were set up to safely manage the influx of COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, treatments requiring ICU surveillance were postponed leading to increased waiting lists. Hypothesis: A coordination center organizing patient transfers and admissions could reduce overcrowding and optimize in-hospital capacity. Methods: The acute lack of hospital capacity urged the region West-Netherlands to form a new regional system for patient triage and transfer: the Regional Capacity and Patient Transfer Service (RCPS). By combining hospital capacity data and a new method of triage and transfer, the RCPS was able to effectively select patients for transfer to other hospitals within the region or, in close collaboration with the National Capacity and Patient Transfer Service (LCPS), transfer patients to hospitals in other regions within the Netherlands. Results: From March 2020 through December 2021 (22 months), the RCPS West-Netherlands was requested to transfer 2,434 COVID-19 patients. After adequate triage, 1,720 patients with a mean age of 62 (SD = 13) years were transferred with the help of the RCPS West-Netherlands. This concerned 1,166 ward patients (68%) and 554 ICU patients (32%). Overcrowded hospitals were relieved by transferring these patients to hospitals with higher capacity. Conclusion: The health care system in the region West-Netherlands benefitted from the RCPS for both ward and ICU occupation. Due to the coordination by the RCPS, regional ICU occupation never exceeded the maximal ICU capacity, and therefore patients in need for acute direct care could always be admitted at the ICU. The presented method can be useful in reducing the waiting lists caused by the delayed care and for coordination and transfer of patients with new variants or other infectious diseases in the future.

IntroductionEmergency department (ED) overcrowding is a major healthcare problem associated with worse patient outcomes and increased costs. Attempts to reduce ED overcrowding of patients with cardiac complaints have so far focused on in-hospital triage and rapid risk stratification of patients with chest pain at the ED. The Hollands-Midden Acute Regional Triage—Cardiology (HART-c) study aimed to assess the amount of patients left at home in usual ambulance care as compared with the new prehospital triage method. This method combines paramedic assessment and expert cardiologist consultation using live monitoring, hospital data and real-time admission capacity.Methods and analysisPatients visited by the emergency medical services (EMS) for cardiac complaints are included. EMS consultation consists of medical history, physical examination and vital signs, and ECG measurements. All data are transferred to a newly developed platform for the triage cardiologist. Prehospital data, in-hospital medical records and real-time admission capacity are evaluated. Then a shared decision is made whether admission is necessary and, if so, which hospital is most appropriate. To evaluate safety, all patients left at home and their general practitioners (GPs) are contacted for 30-day adverse events.Ethics and disseminationThe study is approved by the LUMC’s Medical Ethics Committee. Patients are asked for consent for contacting their GPs. The main results of this trial will be disseminated in one paper.DiscussionThe HART-c study evaluates the efficacy and feasibility of a prehospital triage method that combines prehospital patient assessment and direct consultation of a cardiologist who has access to live-monitored data, hospital data and real-time hospital admission capacity. We expect this triage method to substantially reduce unnecessary ED visits.

Objective: To assess whether the COVID-19 lockdown might have had negative indirect health effects, as people seem to have been reluctant to seek medical care. Methods: All emergency medical service (EMS) rides for chest pain and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the Dutch region Hollands-Midden (population served >800.000) were evaluated during the initial 6 weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown and compared to the same period in 2019 in two cohorts. The primary end-point was the incidence of evaluated chest pain patients during the COVID-19 lockdown. In addition, the incidence of EMS evaluations of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and OHCA were assessed.Results: During the COVID-19 lockdown period, the EMS evaluated 927 chest pain patients (49% male, 62±17 years) as compared to 1041 patients (51% male, 63±17 years) in the same period in 2019 corresponding with a significant relative risk reduction of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.96; P=0.006). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of STEMI patients (RR 0.52; P=0.009) whereas the incidence of OHCA (RR 1.23; P=0.29) remained unchanged. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 lockdown, there was a significant decrease in patients with chest pain evaluated by the EMS paralleled by a reduction in STEMIs, while the incidence of OHCA remained similar. While the reason for the decrease in chest pain and STEMI consultations is not entirely clear, more attention should be drawn to the importance of contacting the EMS in case of suspected cardiac symptoms in possible future lockdowns.

Introduction Cardiac symptoms are one of the most prevalent reasons for emergency department (ED) visits [1], however most of these patients do not have acute cardiovascular disease. This leads to ED overcrowding which subsequently leads to worse patient outcomes and increased costs [2,3]. Attempts to reduce overcrowding have focused mostly on in-hospital triage. The Hollands-midden Acute Regional Triage – cardiology (HART-c) study uses a newly developed triage platform which includes live monitoring, real-time admission capacity, in-hospital data and cardiologist consultation for improved prehospital triage. Purpose The HART-c study aims to safely increase the percentage of patients with cardiac symptoms not referred to the hospital after emergency medical service (EMS) consultation. Methods Patients aged 18 years or older visited by the EMS for cardiac symptoms were included in the region Hollands-Midden from September 2019 till March 2020 (non-COVID period) and compared with the year earlier. Patients were excluded when primary PCI was indicated. EMS consultation consisted of medical history, physical examination, vital parameters and ECG. All data were transferred to a newly developed platform combining pre-hospital data, shown in real-time, and hospital data, such as medical records and admission capacity. The paramedic contacted an on-call triage cardiologist and decided whether admission was necessary and, if so, which regional hospital was most appropriate (figure 1). The study objective was defined as the percentage of patients not referred to the hospital after EMS consultation. Safety of the triage method was defined in the non-referred patients in the intervention as the percentage of MACE (death and acute coronary syndrome) 30 days after non-referral. Results In the intervention group 1755 patients (age 69±15 years, 53% men), and in the control group 1629 patients (age 68±15 years, 53% men) were consulted by the EMS during the HART-c study. In the intervention group 11.4% of patients consulted to the EMS were left at home, compared to 5.5% in the control group (figure 2). Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the effect of the triage intervention. The model was corrected for gender, age and seasonal changes. The chance of being left at home after EMS consultation was 2.29 (95% CI 1.73–3.02, p<0.001) times higher in the intervention group compared to the control. All patients left at home in the intervention group and their GP's were contacted for adverse events, after case-by-case review the MACE rate was <1%. Furthermore a decrease in interhospital transfers was seen, from 206 in the intervention to 173 in the control. Conclusion Implementation of an innovative triage method successfully increased the percentage of patients with cardiac symptoms safely left at home. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Triage without (A) and with (B) platform Non-referral in intervention and control