No abstract

Background: Colchicine has been proposed as a potential therapy in coronavirus disease 2019 due to their anti-inflammatory actions. Methods: The COL-COVID study was a prospective, randomized, controlled and openlabel clinical trial that compared colchicine added to standard treatment vs standard treatment in hospitalized COVID-19 patients that do not need mechanical ventilatory support. Colchicine was initiated within the first 48 hours of admission at a 1.5 mg loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg b.i.d. for one week and 0.5 mg per day for 28 days. The study endpoints were clinical status (7-points WHO ordinal scale) and inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6 and CRP). Results: A total of 103 patients (51±12 years, 52% male) were randomly allocated to colchicine arm (n=52) and control arm (n=51). At day 28, all patients in the colchicine group were alive and discharged, whereas in the control group, two patients died in-hospital and one patient remained hospitalized. Clinical improvement in terms of changes on WHO scale at day 14 and 28 and time to 1-point clinical improvement did not differ between the two groups. Clinical deterioration (increase of at least 1-point in WHO scale) was observed in a higher proportion of cases in colchicine group (13.8%) vs control group (5.8%) (p=0.303); after adjustment by baseline risk factors and concomitant therapies, colchicine therapy was associated with a lower risk of clinical deterioration (p=0.030). Inflammatory biomarkers CRP and IL-6 concentrations course did not differ between the two arms. Conclusion:In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, colchicine treatment neither improved the clinical status, nor the inflammatory response, over the standard treatment. Nevertheless, a preventive effect for further clinical deterioration might be possible. Trial Registration: NCT04350320.

No abstract

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

RESULTADOS:La ruralización del ITS/VIH puede relacionarse con las prácticas de iniciación sexual femeninas pero sobre todo con el miedo del migrante a que su concubina tenga relaciones extra-conyugales en su ausencia. El embarazo y la crianza son recursos masculinos de control de las esposas.CONCLUSIONES: La migración de retorno implica formas de vulnerabilidad para las mujeres indígenas en las localidades estudiadas, cuya sexualidad tiene un remarcado carácter reproductivo. Es necesario implementar políticas de prevención para ITS/VIH dirigidas a fortalecer derechos sexuales y reproductivos de las mujeres y que tomen en cuenta aspectos de identidad sexual masculina.