1. Electrophysiological and morphological (retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase, HRP) experiments have been carried out in the cat in order to study the associative projections from area SI to ipsilateral SII. 2. Microelectrode recordings were performed in the forepaw focus of SII both in normal (64 units) and in SI-undercut (51 units) cats. 29.6% of the neurons recorded in the unoperated and 29.4% of those collected in the operated cats were excited by electric stimulation of the ipsilateral SI (forepaw focus). In both preparations almost all such units were endowed with large (either contra- or bilateral) receptive fields (RF). Cell population recorded in the SI-undercut cats showed no significant impairment to peripheral stimuli and/or changes in the size of the RFs. 3. From the forepaw focus of SI, 150 units have been recorded and tested by stimulation of the homologous focus of the ipsilateral SII. Eight of them were fired antidromically and thus identified as association cells. Their RFs were very small and located only in the digits of the contralateral forepaw. 4. Both single or multiple HRP injections were performed in SII. Retrogradely labelled cells were found in the ipsilateral SI. The great majority of association cells are pyramids and dwell mainly in layer III. In spite of the large diffusion of the exogenous reaction product in the injected SII and of the presence of retrogradely labelled cells anywhere in the ipsilateral thalamic VB complex, the distribution of association cells is unequal throughout SI since they strongly predominate in the digit zone of the forepaw representation.

Debido al aporte de materia orgánica, la vegetación ribereña juega un papel importante en la estructura y complejidad de los ríos (Boothroyd et al., 2004). La vegetación rivereña se encuentra más conectada a la vida que sucede dentro del río que fuera de él, cumpliendo un rol fundamental en la cadena trófica de estos ambientes y en la determinación de la composición de las comunidades que lo habitan, como son los macroinvertebrados (Vannote et al., 1980;Corbacho et al, 2003). Los cambios en el uso del suelo se reflejan en los recursos hídricos, que sufren degradación de su calidad a través de la contaminación

No abstract

Antarctica currently has few non-native species, compared to other regions of the planet, due to the continent’s isolation, extreme climatic conditions and the lack of habitat. However, human activity, particularly the activities of national government operators and tourism, increasingly contributes to the risk of non-native species transfer and establishment. Trichocera (Saltitrichocera) maculipennis Meigen, 1888 (Diptera, Trichoceridae) is a non-native fly originating from the Northern Hemisphere that was unintentionally introduced to King George Island in the maritime Antarctic South Shetland Islands around 15 years ago, since when it has been reported within or in the vicinity of several research stations. It is not explicitly confirmed that T. maculipennis has established in the natural environment, but life-history characteristics make this likely, thereby making potential eradication or control a challenge. Antarctic Treaty Parties active in the region are developing a coordinated and expanding international response to monitor and control T. maculipennis within and around stations in the affected area. However, there remains no overarching non-native invasive species management plan for the island or the wider maritime Antarctic region (which shares similar environmental conditions and habitats to those of King George Island). Here we present some options towards the development of such a plan. We recommend the development of (1) clear mechanisms for the timely coordination of response activities by multiple Parties operating in the vicinity of the introduction location and (2) policy guidance on acceptable levels of environmental impacts resulting from eradication attempts in the natural environment, including the use of pesticides.

Bees (Family Apidae) hold a key role as pollinators in a wide range of angiosperm communities. South America suffered strong modifications during the last decade due to increasing anthropic activities and the expansion of agricultural areas, particularly the boom of soybean. The goal of this research was to know the current diversity of bees in South and Low Littoral regions in Uruguay. Specimens were collected in the seasons 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 on natural meadows, cultivated grasslands, soybean fields, among others flowering communities. Collected specimens were classified following taxonomic keys. Forty-five bee species or taxa were distinguished belonging to the subfamilies Megachilinae (11), Apinae (22), Halictinae (7), Colletinae (2), and Andreninae (3). Most taxa were classified up to genus and 14 to species level. Bee diversity was higher for the South region, with traditional agriculture and rangelands, than that of the Low Littoral region where an increasing agricultural land use took place during the last decade, particularly soybean. In addition, this research aimed to study the presence of native bees and the introduced Apis mellifera (Apinae) in a soybean field at four transects located at 0, 50, 100, and 200 m from the crop border in both seasons. Native bee species were only present at 0 and 50 m, pointing to the relevance of natural edge plant communities for their preservation. This is the first survey on native bee diversity in Uruguay to be regarded as a baseline and the setup of conservation strategies.