In many computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of stented vessel haemodynamics, the geometry of the stented vessel is described using non-deformed (NDF) geometrical models. These NDF models neglect complex physical features, such as stent and vessel deformation, which may have a major impact on the haemodynamic environment in stented coronary arteries. In this study, CFD analyses were carried out to simulate pulsatile flow conditions in both NDF and realistically-deformed (RDF) models of three stented coronary arteries. While the NDF models were completely idealised, the RDF models were obtained from nonlinear structural analyses and accounted for both stent and vessel deformation. Following the completion of the CFD analyses, major differences were observed in the time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), time-averaged wall shear stress gradient (TAWSSG) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) distributions predicted on the luminal surface of the artery for the NDF and RDF models. Specifically, the inclusion of stent and vessel deformation in the CFD analyses resulted in a 32%, 30% and 31% increase in the area-weighted mean TAWSS, a 3%, 7% and 16% increase in the area-weighted mean TAWSSG and a 21%, 13% and 21% decrease in the area-weighted mean OSI for Stents A, B and C, respectively. These results suggest that stent and vessel deformation are likely to have a major impact on the haemodynamic environment in stented coronary arteries. In light of this observation, it is recommended that these features are considered in future CFD studies of stented vessel haemodynamics.

This review examines four imaging modalities; ultrasound (US), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), that have common or potential applications in vascular access (VA). The four modalities are reviewed under their primary uses, techniques, advantages and disadvantages, and future directions that are specific to VA. Currently, US is the most commonly used modality in VA because it is cheaper (relative to other modalities), accessible, non-ionising, and does not require the use of contrast agents. DSA is predominantly only performed when an intervention is indicated. MRI is limited by its cost and the time required for image acquisition that mainly confines it to the realm of research where high resolution is required. CT’s short acquisition times and high resolution make it useful as a problem-solving tool in complex cases, although accessibility can be an issue. All four imaging modalities have advantages and disadvantages that limit their use in this particular patient cohort. Current imaging in VA comprises an integrated approach with each modality providing particular uses dependent on their capabilities. MRI and CT, which currently have limited use, may have increasingly important future roles in complex cases where detailed analysis is required.

No abstract

No abstract