No abstract

Background:As part of a market-driven response to the increasing costs of hospital-based surgical care, an increasing volume of orthopaedic procedures are being performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). The purpose of the present study was to identify recent trends in orthopaedic ASC procedure volume, utilization, and reimbursements in the Medicare system between 2012 and 2017.Methods:This cross-sectional, national study tracked annual Medicare claims and payments and aggregated data at the county level. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models were used to evaluate trends in procedure volume, utilization rates, and reimbursement rates, and to identify demographic predictors of ASC utilization.Results:A total of 1,914,905 orthopaedic procedures were performed at ASCs in the Medicare population between 2012 and 2017, with an 8.8% increase in annual procedure volume and a 10.5% increase in average reimbursements per case. ASC orthopaedic procedure utilization, including utilization across all subspecialties, is strongly associated with metropolitan areas compared with rural areas. In addition, orthopaedic procedure utilization, including for sports and hand procedures, was found to be significantly higher in wealthier counties (measured by average household income) and in counties located in the South.Conclusions:This study demonstrated increasing orthopaedic ASC procedure volume in recent years, driven by increases in hand procedure volume. Medicare reimbursements per case have steadily risen and outpaced the rate of inflation over the study period. However, as orthopaedic practice overhead continues to increase, other Medicare expenditures such as hospital payments and operational and implant costs also must be evaluated. These findings may provide a source of information that can be used by orthopaedic surgeons, policy makers, investors, and other stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding the costs and benefits of the use of ASCs for orthopaedic procedures.

Background:The coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted a shift in health-care provision toward implementation of telemedicine. This study investigated demographic information on orthopaedic telemedicine utilization at a single academic orthopaedic institution in an effort to identify factors associated with telemedicine usage.Methods:Demographic and appointment data were collected from the electronic medical record during equivalent time periods prior to the onset of the COVID pandemic (pre-COVID) and during the COVID pandemic (peri-COVID). Multivariate analyses were performed to identify demographic and socioeconomic correlates of telemedicine utilization.Results:There was a significant increase in telemedicine visits between the eras of study, with significant differences in telemedicine usage in association with age, sex, marital status, English as the primary language, and insurance type (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses found American Indian/Alaska Native (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.487, p = 0.004), Black/African American (aOR = 0.622, p < 0.001), Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (aOR = 0.676, p = 0.003), and Asian (aOR = 0.731, p < 0.001) race to be significantly associated with decreased telemedicine usage. Additionally, male sex (aOR = 0.878, p < 0.001) and a non-commercial insurance plan (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with decreased telemedicine usage.Conclusions:Non-White race, non-commercial insurance plans, and male sex were associated with decreased telemedicine utilization. Further investigation is needed to characterize and better identify underlying factors contributing to disparities in telemedicine access and utilization.

Background: Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are vital in the administration of surgical analgesia and have grown in popularity for use in lower extremity arthroscopic procedures because of their capacity to safely and effectively control pain. The number and specificity of PNBs, however, have made choosing the best option for a procedure nebulous for orthopaedic surgeons. Purpose: To present a narrative literature review of the PNBs available for arthroscopic hip and knee procedures that is adapted to an audience of orthopaedic surgeons. Study Design: Narrative literature review. Methods: A combination of the names of various lower extremity PNBs AND “hip arthroscopy” OR “knee arthroscopy” was used to search the English medical literature including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Scopus. Placement technique, specificity of blockade, efficacy, and complications were assessed. Searches were performed through May 2, 2021. Results: A total of 157 studies were included in this review of lower extremity PNBs. Femoral nerve, lumbar plexus, sciatic nerve, and fascia iliaca compartment blocks were most commonly used in arthroscopic hip surgery, while femoral nerve, 3-in-1, and adductor canal blocks were preferred for arthroscopic knee surgery. Each block demonstrated a significant benefit ( P > .05) in ≥1 of the following outcomes: intraoperative morphine, pain scores, nausea, and/or opioid consumption. Combination blocks including the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block, obturator nerve block, quadratus lumborum block, and L1 and L2 paravertebral block have also been described. Complication rates ranged from 0% to 4.8% in those administered with ultrasound guidance. The most commonly reported complications included muscular weakness, postoperative falls, neuropathy, intravascular and intraneural injections, and hematomas. Conclusion: When administered properly, PNBs were a safe and effective adjuvant method of pain control with a significant potential to limit postoperative narcotic use. While blockade choice varies by surgeon preference and procedure, all PNBs should be administered with ultrasound guidance, and vigilant protocols for the risk of postoperative falls should be exercised in patients who receive them.