Rationale-Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, is currently approved as a treatment for heroin dependence. However, naltrexone is generally not well accepted by patients, and medication noncompliance is a difficult obstacle to treatment. A sustained-release form of naltrexone may improve compliance.Objective-The present study was designed to evaluate the time course, safety, and effectiveness of a depot formulation of naltrexone (Depotrex ® ).Methods-Twelve heroin-dependent individuals participated in an 8-week inpatient study. After a 1-week detoxification period, six participants received 192 mg naltrexone base and six participants received 384 mg naltrexone base. For safety, the low dose of depot naltrexone was NIH Public AccessAuthor Manuscript Psychopharmacology (Berl). Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 July 02. NIH-PA Author Manuscript tested before the high dose. The effects of heroin (0, 6.25, 12.5, 18.75, 25 mg, IV) were evaluated for the next 6 weeks. One dose of heroin was tested per day on Mondays through Fridays, and the entire dose range was tested each week. Active heroin doses were administered in ascending order during the week, while placebo could be administered on any day. Subjective, performance, and physiological effects were measured both before and after heroin administration. The hypotheses were that depot naltrexone would antagonize the effects of heroin, and that the high dose of depot naltrexone would produce a more effective and longer-lasting antagonism than the low dose.Results-The low and high doses of depot naltrexone antagonized heroin-induced subjective ratings for 3 and 5 weeks, respectively. Plasma levels of naltrexone remained above 1 ng/ml for approximately 3 and 4 weeks after administration of 192 mg and 384 mg naltrexone. Other than the initial discomfort associated with the injection of depot naltrexone, there were no untoward side-effects. Conclusions: These results suggest that this depot formulation of naltrexone provides a safe, effective, long-lasting antagonism of the effects of heroin.

Eight heroin-dependent individuals, maintained on divided daily doses of oral morphine, participated in a 2.5-week inpatient study comparing the effects of intranasal (IN) (placebo, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 mg) and intravenous (IV) (placebo, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 mg) heroin. Each morning, participants received $20 and a sample dose of heroin, and each afternoon they had the opportunity to self-administer all or part of the morning heroin dose or money amount. Participants responded under a modified progressive-ratio schedule (PR 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2400, 2800) during a ten-trial self-administration task. During each trial, participants could respond for 1/10th of the heroin dose or 1/10th of the money amount. The total amount of heroin and/or money chosen during the self-administration task was given at the end of the task. Thus, participants received drug and/or money twice each day: once during the morning sample session and once during the afternoon self-administration session. Participants received IV solution and IN powder simultaneously during each dosing; only one route contained active drug. Heroin produced dose-related increases in break point values by both routes of administration. Although IV heroin was approximately four-fold more potent than IN heroin, the maximal break point values for both routes were not significantly different. A similar difference in potency between the IV and IN routes was found for several ratings of subjective effects (e.g., "I feel a good drug effect," "I feel high"), but maximal subjective ratings were lower for IN compared to IV heroin. These results suggest that the reinforcing efficacy of heroin is similar by the two routes of administration, but that IN heroin is less potent than IV heroin. The results also underscore the importance of evaluating drug self-administration in the evaluation of the abuse liability of drugs.

Background Rates of relapse among cocaine-dependent patients are high, and new treatment approaches are needed. Clinical data demonstrate that a cocaine vaccine (TA-CD: Celtic Pharmaceutical) produces selective anti-cocaine antibodies, yet the impact of these antibodies on cocaine’s direct effects is unknown. The objective of this human laboratory study was to measure the relationship between antibody titers and the effects of smoked cocaine on ratings of intoxication, craving and cardiovascular effects. Methods Ten cocaine-dependent men not seeking drug treatment spent 2 nights per week for 13 weeks inpatient where the effects of cocaine (0, 25, 50 mg) were determined prior to vaccination and at weekly intervals thereafter. Two doses of TA-CD (82 µg, n=4; 360 µg, n=6) were administered at weeks 1, 3, 5 and 9. Results Peak plasma antibody levels, which were highly variable, significantly predicted cocaine’s effects. Those individuals in the upper half of antibody production had an immediate (within 4 minutes of cocaine smoking) and robust (55–81%) reduction in ratings of Good Drug Effect and Cocaine Quality, while those in the lower half showed only a nonsignificant attenuation (6–26%). Self-reported cocaine use while participants were outpatient tended to decrease as a function of antibody titer (p < 0.12). By contrast, higher antibody levels predicted significantly greater cocaine-induced tachycardia. Conclusions The TA-CD vaccine substantially decreased smoked cocaine’s intoxicating effects in those generating sufficient antibody. These data support further testing of cocaine immunotherapy as a treatment for cocaine dependence.

These data do not support the use of general anesthesia for heroin detoxification and rapid opioid antagonist induction.

These data suggest that D1 agonists may have potential utility for the treatment of cocaine abuse.