ABSTRACT. Indigenous peoples of North America, Australia, and New Zealand have a long tradition of harvesting freshwater animals. Over generations of reliance and subsistence harvesting, Indigenous peoples have acquired a profound understanding of these freshwater animals and ecosystems that have become embedded within their cultural identity. We have identified trans-Pacific parallels in the cultural significance of several freshwater animal groups, such as eels, other finfish, bivalves, and crayfish, to Indigenous peoples and their understanding and respect for the freshwater ecosystems on which their community survival depends. In recognizing such cultural connections, we found that non-Indigenous peoples can appreciate the deep significance of freshwater animals to Indigenous peoples and integrate Indigenous stewardship and Indigenous ecological knowledge into effective comanagement strategies for sustainable freshwater fisheries, such as Indigenous rangers, research partnerships, and Indigenous Protected Areas. Given that many of these culturally significant freshwater species also play key ecological roles in freshwater ecosystems, their recognition and prioritization in management and monitoring approaches should help sustain the health and well-being of both the social and ecological components of freshwater ecosystems.

An underlying assumption of laboratory‐based toxicity tests is that the sensitivity of organisms in the laboratory (in vitro) is comparable to that in the field (in situ). We tested this assumption by exposing estuarine amphipods (Chaetocorophium cf. lucasi) to a concentration series of cadmium‐spiked sediments in vitro and in situ for 10 d. In situ exposures were conducted within plastic‐mesh cages on an intertidal mudflat. To characterize exposure, we measured interstitial water cadmium concentrations (IWCd), acid volatile sulfide (AVS), and simultaneously extracted Cd (SEMCd) at the beginning and end of the exposures. Between day 0 and day 10, AVS decreased in both in vitro and in situ exposures, while IWCd levels declined less in vitro (median 27%) than in situ (median 76%). Despite more extreme conditions of temperature (10–36°C) and salinity (18–22%o) in situ, in vitro and in situ exposures showed comparable survival responses based on SEMCd/AVS (LC50 [95% CI]: 1.6 [1.46–1.78] and 1.8 [1.76–1.83], respectively), with the onset of marked mortality above a SEMCd/AVS value of about one and minimal survival (<5%) above a value of two. Based on IWCd concentrations, however, sensitivity was significantly greater in vitro (LC50 = 0.41 μg Cd/L [0.171–0.959], in situ LC50 = 1.6 μg Cd/L [1.15–2.16]). We concluded that, in our tests, amphipod sensitivity in vitro was equal to or greater than its sensitivity in situ.

A 100-mm diameter bypass was installed in the dam face at a small hydropower station on the Mokau River, New Zealand, and its use by downstream migrating silver eels, Anguilla spp., was monitored by trapping at the outlet in autumn 2002 and 2003. In addition, a passive integrated transponder system was used to monitor passage over the spillway. Migrant eels were able to find the bypass, with 544 and 744 eels recorded using it in 2002 and 2003 respectively. Although the bypass was the sole means of safe passage at low flow, migrant eels passed down the spillway in preference to the bypass when the dam was overtopped during floods. A combination of spilling and small diameter bypasses would provide safe downstream passage at hydroelectric facilities for silver eels, so long as entrainment and impingement at the intake screens can be prevented. K E Y W O R D S :Anguilla, bypass, downstream migration, eel, hydroelectric dam, spillway.

Historical and contemporary settingIn this special issue, the historical and contemporary setting which has hindered and aided Māori participation in aquatic management is discussed Hepi et al.

The feeding rate of juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss Richardson, 1836, on small (1-2 mm diam.) Daphnia spp. in laboratory tanks was not reduced by turbidity levels up to 160 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU). Furthermore, the high feeding rates on larger, benthic prey (viz. Deleatidium spp. and chironomid larvae) in clear water (0 NTU) were maintained at turbidities up to 160 NTU. Therefore, any impairment of vision by increased turbidity did not affect the ability of trout to feed on these prey, and non-visual senses may be used for the capture of such prey in turbid waters. Although trout were strongly size-selective for both large chironomid and Deleatidium larvae in clear water, turbidities over 20 and 160 NTU, respectively, reduced size-selection. Vision is therefore needed by trout to select larger prey. However, chironomid larvae were consumed by trout in the complete absence of light, so their ability to capture these prey in tanks was not dependent on visual cues. It is apparent that trout do use other senses such as the lateral line system to detect and capture such prey when turbidity levels are high and when light levels or water clarity are low. This ability is expected to offset any reduction in visual feeding caused by increased turbidity, and it helps explain the increased emphasis on epibenthic feeding by trout in turbid waters.