Background: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) are emerging criteria for patient-based treatment assessments. However, few studies have investigated these measures after rotator cuff repair. Purpose: (1) To determine MCID, SCB, and PASS values for pain visual analog scale (pVAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. (2) To determine factors for achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from a rotator cuff surgery registry between March 2018 and February 2019. Eighty-two patients were included, and anchor questions for deriving MCID, SCB, and PASS values were applied at 1-year follow-up after the surgery. The MCID and SCB for the pVAS, ASES, SANE, and UCLA scores were then derived via 2 methods: a sensitivity- and specificity-based approach, which was used alone to derive PASS values, and a between-patients approach. Additionally, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors for achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Results: All 4 scores showed acceptable areas under the curve. MCID, SCB, and PASS values for the pVAS were 1.5, 2.5, and 1.7; for ASES scores, 21.0, 26.0, and 78.0; for SANE, 13.0, 20.0, and 71.0; and for UCLA scores, 6.0, 8.0, and 23.0, respectively. Poor preoperative scores demonstrated significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for achieving the MCID and SCB and lower ORs for achieving the PASS. Retear, large to massive tear, and older age showed lower ORs for achieving the MCID or SCB. For PASS items, male sex and biceps tenodesis had higher ORs, and older age had lower ORs. MCID, SCB, and PASS values per the sensitivity- and specificity-based approach were applied in factor analyses. Conclusion: Reliable MCID, SCB, and PASS values were obtained from patient evaluations 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Poor preoperative score (MCID and SCB), male sex, and biceps tenodesis showed higher ORs, whereas poor preoperative score (PASS), retear, large to massive tear, and older age demonstrated lower ORs.

Background: Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) is an alternative to open surgery for irreparable chronic rotator cuff tears (RCTs). This approach can provide static restraint while avoiding upward migration of the humeral head. However, graft tears and their effect on clinical outcomes after ASCR remain a debated topic. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of ASCR with mesh augmentation for the treatment of irreparable RCTs. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The data of 72 patients with irreparable RCTs who underwent ASCR between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Among them, 64 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Fascia lata grafts augmented with a polypropylene mesh were used for 30 patients (mesh group), and grafts without mesh augmentation were used for 34 patients (control group). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire, and visual analog scale for pain. Radiological outcomes were evaluated according to acromiohumeral distance and stage of rotator cuff arthropathy. The status of fatty infiltration and graft integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Results: Both groups showed improvement in clinical and radiological outcomes at the final follow-up. The mesh group demonstrated a larger improvement in ASES score (mean ± SD, 29.1 ± 15.8) than the control group (18.1 ± 15.9) ( P = .006). The mean improvement in active forward flexion was significantly higher in mesh group (40°± 26°) than in control group (28°± 23°) ( P = .003). The mean improvement in active external rotation was also significantly higher in the mesh group (11°± 5°) than in the control group (6°± 3°) ( P = .004). Graft healing rate was significantly higher in the mesh group (83.3%) than in the control group (58.8%) ( P = .039), and acromiohumeral distance was significantly greater in the mesh group (9.1 ± 2.4 mm) than in the control group (6.3 ± 1.8 mm) at the final follow-up ( P = .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with graft failure generally showed progression of fatty infiltration without improvement in the stage of rotator cuff arthropathy. Patients with intact grafts demonstrated a more substantial improvement in functional outcomes (ASES score and forward flexion motion). Conclusion: ASCR with mesh augmentation reduced graft failure rate to restore superior shoulder joint stability.