Background: The relative indications of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) continue to evolve. Some surgeons favor RSA over TSA for elderly patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and an intact rotator cuff due to fear of a postoperative (secondary) rotator cuff tear in this age group. However, RSA is associated with unique complications and a worse functional arc of motion compared with TSA. Therefore, it is important to understand the clinical outcomes and rates of revision surgery and secondary rotator cuff tears in elderly patients undergoing TSA. Methods: Between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, 377 consecutive TSAs were performed for primary GHOA in 340 patients 70 years of age or older. The mean age at surgery was 76.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 4.9). Clinical evaluation included pain, motion, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Radiographs were reviewed for preoperative morphology and postoperative complications. All complications and reoperations were recorded. The average clinical follow-up time was 3.3 years (SD, 2.0). Statistical analyses were performed, and Kaplan-Meier implant survival estimates were calculated. For all analyses, a P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean pain visual analog scale and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score at the final follow-up were 1.6 (SD, 2.2) and 78.0 (SD, 17.8), respectively. Forward elevation and external rotation increased from 96 (SD, 30 ) and 26 (SD, 20 ) preoperatively to 160 (SD, 32 ) and 64 (SD, 26 ) postoperatively (P < .001 for each). The percentage of patients who had internal rotation to L5 or greater increased from 24.8% preoperatively to 71.8% postoperatively (P < .001). Revision surgery was performed in 3 shoulders (0.8%), and the 5-year implant survival estimate was 98.9% (95% confidence interval: 97.3%-100%). There were 3 medical (0.8%), 10 minor surgical (2.7%), and 5 major surgical (1.3%) complications. No shoulder had radiographic evidence of humeral component loosening, whereas 7 (2%) had evidence of some degree of glenoid component loosening. In total, there were 5 secondary rotator cuff tears (1.3%), of which 2 (0.5%) required revision surgery. Conclusion: Elderly patients with primary GHOA and an intact rotator cuff have excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes after This study was reviewed and approved by our institutional review board (#12-007498).

Introduction: Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is commonly performed before reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with conflicting evidence on the effect on arthroplasty outcomes. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of a prior RCR on the outcomes and complications of primary RSA. Methods: Between 2007 and 2017, 438 RSAs performed in patients with a prior RCR and 876 case-matched controls were identified from a multicenter database. Patients were grouped based on a preoperative diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). Data collected included range of motion, strength, complications, and revisions. Additional clinical metrics included American Shoulder and Elbow Society score, Constant score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, and the University of California Los Angeles shoulder score. Results: Compared with controls, both GHOA and CTA study groups demonstrated lower postoperative forward elevation (FE) (133°versus 147°, P , 0.001; 133°versus 139°, P = 0.048) and FE trength (6.5 versus 8.2, P = 0.004; 6.1 versus 7.3, P = 0.014). In addition, inferior improvements were observed in the GHOA and CTA study groups with respect to abduction (38°versus 52°, P = 0.001; 36°versus 49°, P = 0.001), FE (41°versus 60°, P , 0.001; 38°versus 52°, P = 0.001), ER (16°versus 25°, P , 0.001; 10°versus 17°, P = 0.001), and Constant score (28.4 versus 37.1, P , 0.001; 26.2 versus 30.9, P = 0.016). Compared with controls, no differences were observed in the GHOA and CTA study groups with respect to notching (11.2% versus 5.6%, P = 0.115; 5.8% versus 7.9%, P = 0.967), complications (4.3% versus 1.6%, P = 0.073; 2.5% versus 2.7%, P = 0.878), and revision surgery (3.1% versus 0.9%, P = 0.089; 1.1% versus 1.3%, P = 0.822). Conclusion: RSA after a prior RCR improves both pain and function, without increasing scapular notching, complications, or revision surgery. However, compared with patients without a prior RCR, postoperative shoulder function may be slightly decreased.